Demissie Wondu Reta, Mulatu Bilisuma, Siraj Ahmed, Hajikassim Abdulmenan, Kejela Edosa, Muluken Zemenu, Mekonin Gezahegn Tesfaye, Biratu Melka, Birhanu Mitiku, Dadi Negashu, Kelbesa Megersa, Belay Admasu, Dukessa Abebe
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Jimma University, Jimma, Oromia, Ethiopia.
School of Medicine, Jimma University, Jimma, Oromia, Ethiopia.
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022 Nov 3;15:2527-2537. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S372428. eCollection 2022.
The nature of COVID-19 transmission creates significant risks in surgical departments owing to the close contact of medical staff with patients, the limited physical environment of the operating room and recovery room, the possibility of shared surgical equipment and challenges in the delivery of surgical care in all surgical departments. Globally, studies have reported that the effects of the pandemic on surgical departments are profound, potentially long-lasting and extensive. To manage these effects, different local guidelines and recommendations have been developed, with potential differences in their effectiveness and implementation. Therefore, harmonized and effective national/international guidelines for specific surgical departments during perioperative periods are pertinent to curtail the infection, and will inevitably need to be adapted for consistent and sustainable implementation by all medical staff. The pattern of surgical patient care during the COVID-19 pandemic at Jimma Medical Center (JMC), Ethiopia, has not been explored yet. The present study aimed to describe the pattern of perioperative surgical patient care, equipment handling and operating room management during the COVID-19 pandemic at JMC.
A cross-sectional study was conducted to describe the pattern of perioperative surgical patient care, equipment handling and operating room management during the COVID-19 pandemic at JMC, using five-point Likert scales (0, not at all; 1, rarely; 2, sometimes; 3, most of the time; 4, frequently). A total of 90 respondents [35 patients (five patients from each of seven surgical departments) and 55 healthcare providers (six professionals from each of nine units, including the center of sterility room and anesthesia)] who were available during the study period, selected by a convenience sampling technique with multistage clustering, participated in the study. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire via direct observation and face-to-face interviews with patients undergoing surgery, healthcare providers and hospital administrators, against the standard surgical patient care guidelines. The collected data were manually checked for missing values and outliers, cleared, entered into EpiData (v4.3.1) and exported to SPSS (v22) for analysis. The mean score of practice was compared among different disciplines by applying the unpaired -test. The findings of the study were reported using tables and narration. A -value of less than 0.05 was declared as statistically significant.
Despite the surgical care practice having changed during the COVID-19 pandemic in all service domains, it is not implemented consistently among different surgical departments owing to different barriers (lack of training on the updated guidelines and financial constraints). The majority of surgical staff were implementing the use of preventive measures against COVID-19, while they were practiced less among patients. The guidelines for surgical practice during the preoperative phase were well applied, especially screening patients by different methods and the application of telemedicine to reduce physical contacts. But, against guidelines, elective patients were planned and underwent surgery, especially in the general surgery department. The implementation of recommended guidelines in the center of sterility room in handling surgical equipment was not very different before and during the pandemic. The extent of practice for anesthesia care, operating room management and postoperative care in the recovery room also changed, and the guidelines were sometimes applied.
Although perioperative surgical care practice differed before and during the pandemic, the standard guidelines were inconsistently implemented among surgical departments. The implementation of recommended guidelines in the center of sterility room in handling surgical equipment was not very different before and during the pandemic. Thus, the authors developed safe surgical care guidelines throughout the different domains (infection prevention and PPE use; preoperative care, intraoperative care, operating room management, anesthesia care, equipment handling process and postoperative care) for all disciplines and shared them with all staff. We recommend that all surgical staff should access these guidelines and strictly adhere to them for surgical service during the pandemic.
由于医务人员与患者密切接触、手术室和恢复室物理空间有限、手术设备可能共享以及所有外科科室在提供手术治疗方面面临挑战,新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)的传播特性给外科科室带来了重大风险。在全球范围内,研究报告称,疫情对外科科室的影响是深远的、可能长期存在且广泛的。为应对这些影响,各地制定了不同的指南和建议,其有效性和实施情况可能存在差异。因此,针对围手术期特定外科科室制定统一且有效的国家/国际指南对于减少感染至关重要,并且必然需要进行调整,以便所有医务人员能够一致且持续地实施。埃塞俄比亚吉马医疗中心(JMC)在COVID-19大流行期间外科患者护理的模式尚未得到研究。本研究旨在描述JMC在COVID-19大流行期间围手术期外科患者护理、设备处理和手术室管理的模式。
采用横断面研究来描述JMC在COVID-19大流行期间围手术期外科患者护理、设备处理和手术室管理的模式,使用五点李克特量表(0,完全没有;1,很少;2,有时;3,大部分时间;4,经常)。通过多阶段整群便利抽样技术,选取了在研究期间可参与的90名受访者[35名患者(七个外科科室各五名患者)和55名医护人员(九个科室各六名专业人员,包括无菌室和麻醉科)]参与研究。通过直接观察以及与手术患者、医护人员和医院管理人员进行面对面访谈,依据标准外科患者护理指南,使用结构化问卷收集数据。对收集到的数据手动检查缺失值和离群值,进行清理,录入EpiData(v4.3.1)并导出到SPSS(v22)进行分析。通过应用非配对t检验比较不同学科的实践平均得分。研究结果以表格和叙述形式呈现。P值小于0.05被判定为具有统计学意义。
尽管在COVID-19大流行期间所有服务领域的手术护理实践都发生了变化,但由于不同障碍(缺乏关于更新指南的培训和资金限制),不同外科科室之间的实施并不一致。大多数外科工作人员在实施针对COVID-19的预防措施,而在患者中实施较少。术前阶段的手术实践指南得到了较好应用,特别是通过不同方法筛查患者以及应用远程医疗以减少身体接触。但是,与指南相悖的是,择期患者仍被安排并接受了手术,尤其是在普通外科科室。在无菌室处理手术设备方面,大流行之前和期间推荐指南的实施情况差异不大。麻醉护理、手术室管理和恢复室术后护理的实践程度也发生了变化,并且有时会应用指南。
尽管围手术期手术护理实践在大流行之前和期间有所不同,但标准指南在各外科科室的实施并不一致。在无菌室处理手术设备方面,大流行之前和期间推荐指南的实施情况差异不大。因此,作者针对所有学科制定了涵盖不同领域(感染预防和个人防护装备使用;术前护理、术中护理、手术室管理、麻醉护理、设备处理流程和术后护理)的安全手术护理指南,并与所有工作人员共享。我们建议所有外科工作人员获取这些指南并在大流行期间严格遵守以提供手术服务。