Frandsen Sara, Drastrup Anne M, Dalin Dagmar A, Vermehren Charlotte
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 Aug;11(8):4519-4527. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_237_22. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
The increasing population of elderly individuals had led to an increasing number of polypharmacy patients. Polypharmacy increases the risk of adverse drug reactions and hospitalization. One means to combat polypharmacy involves performing medication reviews, which can be conducted by different methods and stakeholders.
The study objective was to explore the value of involving different health-care professions in medication reviews at an equal and closely integrated collaborative physical meeting for elderly individuals at a long-term care facility. A specific focus was to explore the contributions and opinions of the different health-care professionals regarding the medication review process.
A single case study was applied to perform an in-depth study of a group of health-care professionals performing medication reviews in collaboration. Hence, the study was performed in two settings: 1) the practical execution of medication reviews at a long-term care facility in an interprofessional team and 2) qualitative semi-structured interviews conducted to explore the forms of work done by different professional groups in performing an interdisciplinary medication review.
Forty-nine residents from a long-term care facility were included in the study and were offered a medication review. In total, they reported 573 prescriptions, for which 150 changes were recommended by the interprofessional team. At the 3- and 8-month follow-ups, 30.0% and 49.5% of the accepted recommendations had been implemented, respectively. According to the interview, the results reveal that the interdisciplinarity of the interprofessional team was perceived as a great advantage to the results of the medication reviews.
The results suggest that performing medication reviews in interprofessional collaboration improves the perceived quality of such reviews with a more complete picture of the residents and their medications, leading to more personalized recommendations and resulting in optimized medication reviews for the individual patients.
老年人口的增加导致了多重用药患者数量的上升。多重用药会增加药物不良反应和住院的风险。应对多重用药的一种方法是进行用药评估,这可以通过不同的方法并由不同的利益相关者来开展。
本研究的目的是探讨在长期护理机构为老年人举办的平等且紧密整合的协作体检会议上,让不同医疗保健专业人员参与用药评估的价值。一个具体重点是探讨不同医疗保健专业人员对用药评估过程的贡献和意见。
采用单案例研究对一组协作进行用药评估的医疗保健专业人员进行深入研究。因此,该研究在两种环境下进行:1)在一个跨专业团队的长期护理机构实际开展用药评估;2)进行定性半结构化访谈,以探讨不同专业组在进行跨学科用药评估时所做的工作形式。
来自一家长期护理机构的49名居民被纳入研究并接受了用药评估。他们总共报告了573份处方,跨专业团队针对这些处方建议了150项更改。在3个月和8个月的随访中,分别有30.0%和49.5%的已接受建议得到了实施。根据访谈结果显示,跨专业团队的跨学科性被认为对用药评估的结果具有很大优势。
结果表明,跨专业协作进行用药评估可提高此类评估的感知质量,更全面地了解居民及其用药情况,从而得出更个性化的建议,并为个体患者优化用药评估。