Suppr超能文献

埃塞俄比亚南部沃莱塔索多地区基于医院的空气传播和表面传播细菌病原体及其抗菌谱

Hospital-Based Air-Borne and Surface-Borne Bacterial Pathogens and Their Antimicrobial Profiles in Wolaita Sodo, Southern Ethiopia.

作者信息

Madebo Chemere, Haile Admasu, Eticha Temesgen, Solomon Fithamlak

机构信息

Areka Urban Development and Construction, Wolaita, Ethiopia.

Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia.

出版信息

Int J Microbiol. 2022 Oct 31;2022:5718341. doi: 10.1155/2022/5718341. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is well documented that hospital environments are the niche/reservoir of many clinically important microorganisms, including multidrug-resistant air-borne and surface-borne pathogens. This problem is the most pressing public health concern, particularly in developing countries like Ethiopia, due to its poor infection management system. This study was planned to detect air-borne and surface-borne bacterial pathogens and their antimicrobial resistance patterns in Wolaita Sodo University Comprehensive Hospital, Southern Ethiopia.

METHOD

A laboratory-based cross-sectional study was conducted from May to July 2021. Swabbing and open-plate sample collection methods were used to collect specimens. Standard bacteriological techniques were used to isolate and identify bacterial pathogens. The Mueller-Hinton agar was used to detect the drug susceptibility pattern of bacteria by using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method.

RESULT

From a total of 323 samples tested, 118 (36.5%) showed the growth of bacteria. The detection rate of bacterial pathogens in the intensive care unit (35.4%) was higher than in operation theater. From the total of 118 bacterial isolates, 39.8%, 27.9%, 20.3%, and 11.5% of , , , and , respectively, were surface-borne. Whereas 37%, 25%, 20.83, and 16.6% of , , , and , respectively, were air-borne. showed a 19.04 to 80.9% range of antimicrobial resistance to different classes of antibiotics from surface specimens. A 12.5-100% range of antibiotic resistance levels was detected for all Gram-negative surface-borne bacterial pathogens. was 66.7%, 73.3%, and 73.3% resistant to gentamicin, chloramphenicol, and ceftriaxone, respectively. showed 75% and 87.5% resistance to ceftriaxone and ciprofloxacin, respectively, and a completely ampicillin-resistant was detected. From a total of 48 bacterial pathogens identified from surfaces in the intensive care unit, 34 (70.8%) developed multidrug resistance.

CONCLUSION

A significant prevalence of surface-borne bacterial pathogens was detected. This study revealed that , , , and were nosocomial infection concerns of the hospital, and this could be the reason for different types of hospital acquired infections in the study area. A high prevalence of MDR was detected in the most surface-borne bacterial isolates.

摘要

背景

有充分文献记载,医院环境是许多具有临床重要性的微生物的生态位/储存库,包括耐多药的空气传播和表面传播病原体。由于感染管理系统不完善,这个问题是最紧迫的公共卫生问题,尤其是在像埃塞俄比亚这样的发展中国家。本研究旨在检测埃塞俄比亚南部沃莱塔索多大学综合医院空气传播和表面传播的细菌病原体及其抗菌药物耐药模式。

方法

于2021年5月至7月进行了一项基于实验室的横断面研究。采用拭子和敞口平板采样方法收集标本。使用标准细菌学技术分离和鉴定细菌病原体。采用 Kirby-Bauer 纸片扩散法,用 Mueller-Hinton 琼脂检测细菌的药敏模式。

结果

在总共检测的323份样本中,118份(36.5%)显示有细菌生长。重症监护病房细菌病原体的检出率(35.4%)高于手术室。在总共118株细菌分离株中,分别有39.8%、27.9%、20.3%和11.5%的[具体细菌名称1]、[具体细菌名称2]、[具体细菌名称3]和[具体细菌名称4]是表面传播的。而分别有37%、25%、20.83%和16.6%的[具体细菌名称1]、[具体细菌名称2]、[具体细菌名称3]和[具体细菌名称4]是空气传播的。[具体细菌名称1]对来自表面标本的不同类抗生素的耐药率在19.04%至80.9%之间。所有革兰氏阴性表面传播细菌病原体的抗生素耐药水平在12.5% - 100%之间。[具体细菌名称1]对庆大霉素、氯霉素和头孢曲松的耐药率分别为66.7%、73.3%和73.3%。[具体细菌名称2]对头孢曲松和环丙沙星的耐药率分别为75%和87.5%,并且检测到一株对氨苄西林完全耐药的[具体细菌名称2]。在重症监护病房表面鉴定出的总共48株细菌病原体中,34株(70.8%)产生了多重耐药性。

结论

检测到表面传播细菌病原体的显著流行率。本研究表明,[具体细菌名称1]、[具体细菌名称2]、[具体细菌名称3]和[具体细菌名称4]是该医院医院感染的关注点,这可能是研究区域内不同类型医院获得性感染的原因。在大多数表面传播细菌分离株中检测到高流行率的多重耐药性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccee/9640229/18e377574a6b/IJMICRO2022-5718341.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验