Department of Medical Parasitology and Infection Biology, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH), Allschwil, Switzerland.
University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Nov 11;77(9):1294-1302. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad387.
The currently recommended benzimidazole monotherapy is insufficiently effective to control infection with the soil-transmitted helminth Trichuris trichiura. Ivermectin-albendazole combination has shown promising, but setting-dependent efficacy, with therapeutic underperformance in Côte d'Ivoire. We evaluated whether moxidectin-albendazole could serve as an alternative to albendazole monotherapy in Côte d'Ivoire.
In this community-based, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group superiority trial, individuals aged 12-60 years were screened for T. trichiura eggs in their stool using quadruplicate Kato-Katz thick smears. Diagnostically and clinically eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive single oral doses of moxidectin (8 mg) and albendazole (400 mg), ivermectin (200 µg/kg) and albendazole (400 mg), or albendazole (400 mg) and placebo. The primary outcome was proportion cured, ie, cure rate (CR), assessed at 2-3 weeks post-treatment. Safety endpoints were assessed pre-treatment and at 3 and 24 hours post-treatment.
For the 210 participants with primary outcome data, we observed CRs of 15.3% in the moxidectin-albendazole arm and 22.5% in the ivermectin-albendazole arm, which did not differ significantly from the CR of 13.4% in the albendazole arm (differences: 1.8%-points [95% confidence interval: -10.1 to 13.6] and 9.1%-points [-3.9 to 21.8], respectively). Most common adverse events were abdominal pain (range across arms: 11.9%-20.9%), headache (4.7%-14.3%), and itching (5.8%-13.1%), which were predominantly mild and transient.
All therapies showed similar low efficacy in treating trichuriasis in Côte d'Ivoire. Alternative treatment options need to be evaluated, and further analyses should be conducted to understand the lack of enhanced activity of the combination therapies in Côte d'Ivoire.
NCT04726969.
目前推荐的苯并咪唑单一疗法对于控制土壤传播的旋毛虫感染效果不足。伊维菌素-阿苯达唑联合疗法显示出了有希望的效果,但疗效因设定而异,在科特迪瓦表现不佳。我们评估了莫昔克丁-阿苯达唑是否可以替代阿苯达唑单一疗法在科特迪瓦使用。
在这项基于社区的、随机的、安慰剂对照的平行组优效性试验中,对年龄在 12-60 岁之间的个体进行粪便中旋毛虫卵的四重加藤厚涂片检测。对诊断和临床合格的参与者进行随机分组(1:1:1),分别接受单次口服莫昔克丁(8 毫克)和阿苯达唑(400 毫克)、伊维菌素(200μg/kg)和阿苯达唑(400 毫克)或阿苯达唑(400 毫克)和安慰剂。主要结局是比例治愈,即治疗后 2-3 周的治愈率(CR)。在治疗前、治疗后 3 小时和 24 小时评估安全性终点。
对于 210 名有主要结局数据的参与者,我们观察到莫昔克丁-阿苯达唑组的 CR 为 15.3%,伊维菌素-阿苯达唑组的 CR 为 22.5%,与阿苯达唑组的 CR 13.4%没有显著差异(差异分别为 1.8 个百分点[95%置信区间:-10.1 至 13.6]和 9.1 个百分点[-3.9 至 21.8])。最常见的不良事件是腹痛(各臂发生率:11.9%-20.9%)、头痛(4.7%-14.3%)和瘙痒(5.8%-13.1%),主要为轻度和短暂。
所有疗法在科特迪瓦治疗鞭虫病的疗效均相似。需要评估替代治疗方案,并进一步分析以了解联合疗法在科特迪瓦缺乏增强活性的原因。
NCT04726969。