Nair Uma P, Shivamurthy Ravindra, Nagate Raghavendra Reddy, Chaturvedi Saurabh, Al-Qahtani Saad M, Magbol Mohammad Al, Gokhale Shankar T, Tikare Shreyas, Chaturvedi Mudita
Department of Periodontology, JSS Dental College & Hospital, Mysuru 570015, India.
Department of Periodontics and Community Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia.
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Oct 22;9(11):602. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9110602.
Background: Periodontal diseases lead to bone loss, crestal defects and even loss of the tooth, which also further makes it difficult to replace the tooth. Autogenous bone grafts are considered the gold standard in bone regenerative procedures. This study aimed to compare and evaluate the bone regenerative effects of i-PRF (Injectable- Platelet-rich fibrin) with a bone graft and a bone graft alone in mandibular grade II furcation defects over a period of 9 months. Method: This was a comparative study of 12 participants, who were randomly selected and grouped into two groups: test and control. Following phase I therapy, both groups were subjected to open flap debridement. In the test group, after debridement, a nano-hydroxyapatite bone graft mixed with i-PRF was inserted, whereas in the control group only a nano-hydroxyapatite bone graft was inserted. The clinical parameters such as plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), pocket probing depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), horizontal probing depth (HPD) and vertical probing depth (VPD) were recorded at baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 9 months following the surgery. The bone area fill (BAF) was assessed using intraoral periapical radiographs (IOPARs) taken at baseline and 9 months after surgery. Results: At the baseline, there was no statistically significant difference between the tested parameters. After 9 months all the clinical parameters, PI, GI, PPD, CAL, HPD and VPD as well as radiographic bone fill showed a significant increase in both the groups (p < 0.05) (PI-TGr; CGr−VPD—3.5 ± 0.54 to 0.66 ± 0.51; 3.3 ± 0.81 to 2 ± 0.63/BAF—2.9 ± 0.88 to 5.6 ± 1.10; 3.4 ± 1.39 to 3.9 ± 1.4). On comparison the test group showed better results for each clinical parameter. Conclusion: The results showed increased improvement in clinical conditions in both groups, although better results were seen in the group where i-PRF with a nano-HA bone graft was used in the furcation defect.
牙周疾病会导致骨质流失、牙槽嵴缺损甚至牙齿脱落,这也进一步增加了牙齿修复的难度。自体骨移植被认为是骨再生手术的金标准。本研究旨在比较和评估注射用富血小板纤维蛋白(i-PRF)联合骨移植与单纯骨移植在下颌Ⅱ度根分叉缺损9个月期间的骨再生效果。方法:这是一项对12名参与者的比较研究,参与者被随机选取并分为两组:试验组和对照组。在第一阶段治疗后,两组均接受开放瓣清创术。在试验组中,清创后植入纳米羟基磷灰石骨移植材料与i-PRF的混合物,而在对照组中仅植入纳米羟基磷灰石骨移植材料。在手术前基线、术后3个月、6个月和9个月记录临床参数,如菌斑指数(PI)、牙龈指数(GI)、牙周袋探诊深度(PPD)、临床附着水平(CAL)、水平探诊深度(HPD)和垂直探诊深度(VPD)。使用手术前基线和术后9个月拍摄的口腔根尖片(IOPARs)评估骨面积填充(BAF)。结果:在基线时,测试参数之间无统计学显著差异。9个月后,两组的所有临床参数,即PI、GI、PPD、CAL、HPD和VPD以及影像学骨填充均有显著增加(p < 0.05)(PI - 试验组;对照组 - VPD—3.5±0.54至0.66±0.51;3.3±0.81至2±0.63/BAF—2.9±0.88至5.6±1.10;3.4±1.39至3.9±1.4)。相比之下,试验组在每个临床参数上均显示出更好的结果。结论:结果显示两组的临床状况均有改善,尽管在根分叉缺损处使用i-PRF联合纳米羟基磷灰石骨移植的组效果更好。