Marcelino J, Franco A M A, Acácio M, Soriano-Redondo A, Moreira F, Catry I
Centre for Applied Ecology "Prof. Baeta Neves" (CEABN-InBIO), School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, Lisboa 1349-017, Portugal.
School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Feb 1;858(Pt 3):159992. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159992. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
Bird migratory journeys are often long and hostile, requiring high energetic expenditure, and thus forcing birds to pause between migratory flights. Stopover sites allow migrants to replenish fuel reserves and rest, being crucial for the success of migration. Worldwide, the increasing accumulation of waste on landfills and rubbish dumps has been described to provide superabundant food resources for many bird species not only during the breeding and wintering seasons but also during migration, being used as stopover sites. Using GPS-tracking data of juvenile white storks (Ciconia ciconia) during their first migration from the Iberia Peninsula to the sub-Saharan wintering grounds, we uncover the effects of stopping en route on individual migratory performance. Particularly, we examine the benefits of stopping at artificial sites (landfills and rubbish dumps) when compared to natural stopover sites (wetlands, agricultural or desert areas) and explore the influence of anthropogenic food resources on storks' migratory strategies. Overall, white storks spent up to one-third of the migration in stopovers. We found that birds that stopped for longer periods made more detours, increasing migration duration by half a day for each stopover day. Stopping more often did not reflect on increasing in-flight energetic efficiency nor the likelihood of completing the migration. Juvenile storks used artificial sites in 80 % of the stopover days, spending 45 % less time and 10 % less energy foraging than when using natural stopovers. While stopping in landfills did not translate into differences in migratory performance, individuals in poor body condition possibly rely on these sites to improve body weight before proceeding, enabling them to successfully complete migration. Artificial stopover sites are attractive and likely increase the number and duration of stops for white storks. Even though the consequences of arriving late at the wintering grounds are unknown, it can lead to cascading consequences, influencing individual fitness and population dynamics.
鸟类的迁徙旅程通常漫长且充满挑战,需要消耗大量能量,因此迫使鸟类在迁徙飞行之间停歇。中途停歇地使候鸟能够补充能量储备并休息,对迁徙的成功至关重要。在全球范围内,垃圾填埋场和垃圾倾倒场垃圾堆积的增加,被认为不仅在繁殖和越冬季节,而且在迁徙期间,都为许多鸟类提供了极为丰富的食物资源,这些地方被用作中途停歇地。利用幼年白鹳(Ciconia ciconia)首次从伊比利亚半岛迁徙到撒哈拉以南越冬地期间的GPS追踪数据,我们揭示了中途停歇对个体迁徙表现的影响。特别是,我们研究了与自然中途停歇地(湿地、农业区或沙漠地区)相比,在人工场所(垃圾填埋场和垃圾倾倒场)停歇的益处,并探讨了人为食物资源对鹳类迁徙策略的影响。总体而言,白鹳在中途停歇地花费了长达三分之一的迁徙时间。我们发现,停歇时间较长的鸟类会有更多迂回路线,每停歇一天,迁徙持续时间就会增加半天。更频繁地停歇并没有提高飞行中的能量效率,也没有增加完成迁徙的可能性。幼年鹳在80%的停歇日使用人工场所,与使用自然停歇地相比,觅食时间减少了45%,能量消耗减少了10%。虽然在垃圾填埋场停歇并没有导致迁徙表现的差异,但身体状况较差的个体可能会依赖这些场所来增加体重,然后继续迁徙,从而能够成功完成迁徙。人工中途停歇地很有吸引力,可能会增加白鹳停歇的次数和时间。尽管晚到越冬地的后果尚不清楚,但这可能会引发连锁反应,影响个体健康和种群动态。