Woo Brandon M, Tan Enda, Yuen Francis L, Hamlin J Kiley
Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA, 02138; Center for Brains, Minds, and Machines, Cambridge, MA, USA, 02139.
Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T 1Z4; Department of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA, 20742.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2023 Jan;27(1):17-29. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.10.003. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
Our ability to understand others' minds stands at the foundation of human learning, communication, cooperation, and social life more broadly. Although humans' ability to mentalize has been well-studied throughout the cognitive sciences, little attention has been paid to whether and how mentalizing differs across contexts. Classic developmental studies have examined mentalizing within minimally social contexts, in which a single agent seeks a neutral inanimate object. Such object-directed acts may be common, but they are typically consequential only to the object-seeking agent themselves. Here, we review a host of indirect evidence suggesting that contexts providing the opportunity to evaluate prospective social partners may facilitate mentalizing across development. Our article calls on cognitive scientists to study mentalizing in contexts where it counts.
我们理解他人心理的能力是人类学习、交流、合作以及更广泛的社会生活的基础。尽管人类的心理化能力在整个认知科学领域都得到了充分研究,但对于心理化在不同情境下是否存在差异以及如何存在差异,却很少有人关注。经典的发展研究考察的是在最小化社会情境中的心理化,即单个主体寻找一个中性的无生命物体。这种指向物体的行为可能很常见,但通常只对寻找物体的主体自身有影响。在这里,我们回顾了一系列间接证据,这些证据表明,提供评估潜在社会伙伴机会的情境可能会促进心理发展过程中的心理化。我们的文章呼吁认知科学家在重要的情境中研究心理化。