Guo Yusheng, Xiang Dongqiao, Wan Jiayu, Yang Lian, Zheng Chuansheng
Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
Hubei Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan 430022, China.
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Oct 27;14(21):5297. doi: 10.3390/cancers14215297.
Background: A number of studies have reported an association between the dynamics of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and clinical efficacy in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), but there is still a lack of a meta-analysis or systematic review. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched until September 2022 for studies reporting on the association between the change in NLR after ICI treatment and clinical outcomes. Outcome measures of interest included: change in NLR before and after treatment, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR). Results: A total of 4154 patients in 38 studies were included. The pooled percentage of patients with increased NLR was 49.7% (95CI%: 43.7−55.8%). Six studies discussing the change in NLR in patients with different tumor responses all showed that the NLR level in patients without response to immunotherapy may increase after ICI treatment. The upward trend in NLR was associated with shorter OS (pooled HR: 2.05, 95%CI: 1.79−2.35, p < 0.001) and PFS (pooled HR: 1.89, 95%CI: 1.66−2.14, p < 0.001) and higher ORR (pooled OR: 0.27, 95%CI: 0.19−0.39, p < 0.001), and downward trend in NLR was associated with longer OS (pooled HR: 0.49, 95%CI: 0.42−0.58, p < 0.001) and PFS (pooled HR: 0.55, 95%CI: 0.48−0.63, p < 0.001) and lower ORR (pooled OR: 3.26, 95%CI: 1.92−5.53, p < 0.001). In addition, post-treatment high NLR was associated with more impaired survival than baseline high NLR (pooled HR of baseline high NLR: 1.82, 95%CI: 1.52−2.18; pooled HR of post-treatment high NLR: 2.93, 95%CI: 2.26−3.81), but the NLR at different time points may have a similar predictive effect on PFS (pooled HR of baseline high NLR: 1.68, 95%CI: 1.44−1.97; pooled HR of post-treatment high NLR: 2.00, 95%CI: 1.54−2.59). Conclusions: The NLR level of tumor patients after ICI treatment is stable overall, but the NLR level in patients without response to immunotherapy may increase after ICI treatment. Patients with an upward trend in NLR after ICI treatment were associated with worse clinical outcomes; meanwhile, the downward trend in NLR was associated with better clinical outcomes. Post-treatment high NLR was associated with more impaired survival than baseline high NLR.
多项研究报告了中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)动态变化与接受免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗患者临床疗效之间的关联,但仍缺乏荟萃分析或系统评价。方法:检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆,截至2022年9月,查找报告ICI治疗后NLR变化与临床结局之间关联的研究。感兴趣的结局指标包括:治疗前后NLR变化、总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和客观缓解率(ORR)。结果:共纳入38项研究中的4154例患者。NLR升高患者的合并百分比为49.7%(95%CI:43.7−55.8%)。六项讨论不同肿瘤反应患者NLR变化的研究均表明,对免疫治疗无反应患者的NLR水平在ICI治疗后可能升高。NLR上升趋势与较短的OS(合并HR:2.05,95%CI:1.79−2.35,p<0.001)和PFS(合并HR:1.89,95%CI:1.66−2.14,p<0.001)以及较高的ORR(合并OR:0.27,95%CI:0.19−0.39,p<0.001)相关,而NLR下降趋势与较长的OS(合并HR:0.49,95%CI:0.42−0.58,p<0.001)和PFS(合并HR:0.55,95%CI:0.48−0.63,p<0.001)以及较低的ORR(合并OR:3.26,95%CI:1.92−5.53,p<0.001)相关。此外,治疗后高NLR比基线高NLR与更多的生存受损相关(基线高NLR的合并HR:1.82,95%CI:1.52−2.18;治疗后高NLR的合并HR:2.93,95%CI:2.26−3.81),但不同时间点的NLR对PFS可能具有相似的预测作用(基线高NLR的合并HR:1.68,95%CI:1.44−1.97;治疗后高NLR的合并HR:2.00,95%CI:1.54−2.59)。结论:ICI治疗后肿瘤患者的NLR水平总体稳定,但对免疫治疗无反应患者的NLR水平在ICI治疗后可能升高。ICI治疗后NLR呈上升趋势的患者临床结局较差;同时,NLR下降趋势与较好的临床结局相关。治疗后高NLR比基线高NLR与更多的生存受损相关。