Ravaggi Antonella, Capoferri Davide, Ardighieri Laura, Ghini Iacopo, Ferrari Federico, Romani Chiara, Bugatti Mattia, Zanotti Laura, Vrede Stephanie, Tognon Germana, Pijnenborg Johanna M A, Sartori Enrico, Calza Stefano, Bignotti Eliana, Odicino Franco
Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy.
Angelo Nocivelli' Institute of Molecular Medicine, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, University of Brescia, 25121 Brescia, Italy.
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Nov 3;14(21):5429. doi: 10.3390/cancers14215429.
Histopathologic assessment of high-risk endometrial cancer (EC) suffers from intersubject variability and poor reproducibility. The pragmatic classification in four molecular subgroups helps to overcome these limits, showing a significant prognostic value. The "no specific molecular profile" (NSMP) is the most heterogeneous EC subgroup, requiring further characterization to better guide its clinical management. DNA sequencing of POLE exonuclease domain and immunohistochemistry for PMS2, MSH6, and p53 were performed in order to stratify a cohort of 94 high-risk EC patients in the four molecular subgroups. Moreover, a panel of seven additional biomarkers was tested. Patients were found to be 16% POLE-mutated, 36% mismatch repair-deficient, 27% p53-abnormal, and 21% NSMP. In the multivariable model, molecular groups confirmed their significant association with disease-specific survival and progression-free survival, with p53-abnormal and NSMP endometrial cancer characterized by poor outcomes. Among the additional evaluated biomarkers, L1CAM was the only one with a significant prognostic value within the NSMP subgroup. NSMP/L1CAM-positive patients experienced the worst outcome and were "early-relapsing" after platinum-based chemotherapy, with a significantly shorter platinum-free interval compared to L1CAM-negative patients. L1CAM appears to be a promising candidate as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in the high-risk NSMP subgroup, which is actually known to lack specific molecular markers.
高危子宫内膜癌(EC)的组织病理学评估存在个体间差异且重复性差的问题。四个分子亚组的实用分类有助于克服这些局限性,显示出显著的预后价值。“无特定分子特征”(NSMP)是最具异质性的EC亚组,需要进一步表征以更好地指导其临床管理。对POLE核酸外切酶结构域进行DNA测序,并对PMS2、MSH6和p53进行免疫组织化学检测,以便将94例高危EC患者分层到四个分子亚组中。此外,还检测了一组另外七个生物标志物。发现患者中16%为POLE突变型,36%为错配修复缺陷型,27%为p53异常型,21%为NSMP型。在多变量模型中,分子亚组证实了它们与疾病特异性生存和无进展生存的显著相关性,p53异常型和NSMP型子宫内膜癌的预后较差。在另外评估的生物标志物中,L1CAM是NSMP亚组中唯一具有显著预后价值的标志物。NSMP/L1CAM阳性患者预后最差,在铂类化疗后“早期复发”,与L1CAM阴性患者相比,无铂间期明显缩短。L1CAM似乎是高危NSMP亚组中有前景的预后和预测生物标志物候选物,而该亚组目前已知缺乏特异性分子标志物。