Zallocco Lorenzo, Silvestri Roberto, Ciregia Federica, Bonotti Alessandra, Marino Riccardo, Foddis Rudy, Lucacchini Antonio, Giusti Laura, Mazzoni Maria Rosa
Department of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, 56100 Pisa, Italy.
Department of Biology, University of Pisa, 56100 Pisa, Italy.
Biomedicines. 2022 Nov 3;10(11):2803. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10112803.
Malignant pleural mesothelioma is an aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis. Unilateral pleural effusion is frequently the initial clinical sign requiring therapeutic thoracentesis, which also offers a diagnostic opportunity. Detection of soluble biomarkers can support diagnosis, but few show good diagnostic accuracy. Here, we studied the expression levels and discriminative power of two putative biomarkers, prosaposin and extracellular sulfatase SULF-1, identified by proteomic and transcriptomic analysis, respectively. Pleural effusions from a total of 44 patients (23 with mesothelioma, 8 with lung cancer, and 13 with non-malignant disease) were analyzed for prosaposin and SULF-1 by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Pleural effusions from mesothelioma patients had significantly higher levels of prosaposin and SULF-1 than those from non-malignant disease patients. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that both biomarkers have good discriminating power as pointed out by an AUC value of 0.853 (p = 0.0005) and 0.898 (p < 0.0001) for prosaposin and SULF-1, respectively. Combining data ensued a model predicting improvement of the diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.916, p < 0.0001). In contrast, prosaposin couldn’t discriminate mesothelioma patients from lung cancer patients while ROC analysis of SULF-1 data produced an AUC value of 0.821 (p = 0.0077) but with low sensitivity. In conclusion, prosaposin and SULF-1 levels determined in pleural effusion may be promising biomarkers for differential diagnosis between mesothelioma and non-malignant pleural disease. Instead, more patients need to be enrolled before granting the possible usefulness of these soluble proteins in differentiating mesothelioma pleural effusions from those linked to lung cancer.
恶性胸膜间皮瘤是一种侵袭性恶性肿瘤,预后较差。单侧胸腔积液常常是需要进行治疗性胸腔穿刺术的初始临床症状,而胸腔穿刺术也提供了一个诊断机会。可溶性生物标志物的检测有助于诊断,但很少有生物标志物具有良好的诊断准确性。在此,我们研究了分别通过蛋白质组学和转录组学分析鉴定出的两种假定生物标志物——鞘脂激活蛋白原和细胞外硫酸酯酶SULF-1的表达水平及鉴别能力。通过酶联免疫吸附测定法对总共44例患者(23例间皮瘤患者、8例肺癌患者和13例非恶性疾病患者)的胸腔积液进行了鞘脂激活蛋白原和SULF-1分析。间皮瘤患者胸腔积液中的鞘脂激活蛋白原和SULF-1水平显著高于非恶性疾病患者。受试者操作特征(ROC)分析表明,这两种生物标志物均具有良好的鉴别能力,鞘脂激活蛋白原和SULF-1的曲线下面积(AUC)值分别为0.853(p = 0.0005)和0.898(p < 0.0001)。合并数据后得到一个预测诊断性能改善的模型(AUC = 0.916,p < 0.0001)。相比之下,鞘脂激活蛋白原无法区分间皮瘤患者和肺癌患者,而SULF-1数据的ROC分析得出的AUC值为0.821(p = 0.0077),但敏感性较低。总之,胸腔积液中测定的鞘脂激活蛋白原和SULF-1水平可能是间皮瘤与非恶性胸膜疾病鉴别诊断的有前景的生物标志物。相反,在确定这些可溶性蛋白在区分间皮瘤胸腔积液与肺癌相关胸腔积液方面的可能用途之前,还需要纳入更多患者。