Suppr超能文献

用于人类粪便样本中肠道寄生虫PCR检测的DNA提取方法的比较研究

Comparative Study of DNA Extraction Methods for the PCR Detection of Intestinal Parasites in Human Stool Samples.

作者信息

Srirungruang Siriporn, Mahajindawong Buraya, Nimitpanya Panachai, Bunkasem Uthaitip, Ayuyoe Pattama, Nuchprayoon Surang, Sanprasert Vivornpun

机构信息

Lymphatic Filariasis and Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Chulalongkorn Medical Research Center (Chula-MRC), Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.

Department of Parasitology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Oct 25;12(11):2588. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12112588.

Abstract

Stool samples typically contain PCR inhibitors; however, helminths are difficult to lyse and can cause false-negative PCR results. We assessed the effective methods for extracting DNA from different kinds of intestinal parasites. We compared the most common DNA extraction methods from stool samples, including the phenol-chloroform technique with or without a bead-beating step (P and PB), a QIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit (Q), and a QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA Kit (QB). Genomic DNA was extracted from 85 stool samples collected from patients infected with sp., hookworm, and . DNA quantity and DNA quality were evaluated via spectrophotometry, and DNA integrity was assessed by PCR. We found that P and PB provided higher DNA yields (~4 times) than when using Q and QB. However, P showed the lowest detection rate of PCR (8.2%), wherein only (7 out of 20 samples) was detected. QB showed the highest detection rate of PCR (61.2%). After plasmid spikes, only 5 samples by QB were negative while 60 samples by P were still negative. Remarkably, QB could extract DNA from all the groups of parasites that we tested. These results indicate that QB is the most effective DNA extraction method for the diagnosis and monitoring of intestinal parasites via PCR.

摘要

粪便样本通常含有PCR抑制剂;然而,蠕虫难以裂解,可能导致PCR结果出现假阴性。我们评估了从不同种类肠道寄生虫中提取DNA的有效方法。我们比较了从粪便样本中提取DNA的最常用方法,包括有无珠磨步骤的酚-氯仿技术(P和PB)、QIAamp快速DNA粪便迷你试剂盒(Q)和QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA试剂盒(QB)。从85份粪便样本中提取基因组DNA,这些样本来自感染了 种、钩虫和 的患者。通过分光光度法评估DNA数量和质量,并通过PCR评估DNA完整性。我们发现,与使用Q和QB相比,P和PB的DNA产量更高(约4倍)。然而,P的PCR检测率最低(8.2%),其中仅检测到 (20个样本中的7个)。QB的PCR检测率最高(61.2%)。加入质粒后,QB只有5个样本为阴性,而P有60个样本仍为阴性。值得注意的是,QB能够从我们测试的所有寄生虫组中提取DNA。这些结果表明,QB是通过PCR诊断和监测肠道寄生虫最有效的DNA提取方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f444/9689707/6c7220dea235/diagnostics-12-02588-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative Study of DNA Extraction Methods for the PCR Detection of Intestinal Parasites in Human Stool Samples.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Oct 25;12(11):2588. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12112588.
3
Comparison of four DNA extraction and three preservation protocols for the molecular detection and quantification of soil-transmitted helminths in stool.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Oct 28;13(10):e0007778. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007778. eCollection 2019 Oct.
7
Evaluation of fecal DNA extraction protocols for human gut microbiome studies.
BMC Microbiol. 2020 Jul 17;20(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12866-020-01894-5.
10
An alternative DNA extraction method for detection of Blastocystis spp. in human fecal samples.
Exp Parasitol. 2018 Mar;186:36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2018.01.019. Epub 2018 Feb 10.

本文引用的文献

2
Comparative Study of Eleven Mechanical Pretreatment Protocols for DNA Extraction from Stool Samples.
Microorganisms. 2021 Feb 2;9(2):297. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9020297.
3
Evaluation of fecal DNA extraction protocols for human gut microbiome studies.
BMC Microbiol. 2020 Jul 17;20(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12866-020-01894-5.
4
Comparison of four DNA extraction and three preservation protocols for the molecular detection and quantification of soil-transmitted helminths in stool.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Oct 28;13(10):e0007778. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007778. eCollection 2019 Oct.
8
DNA extraction in Echinococcus granulosus and Taenia spp. eggs in dogs stool samples applying thermal shock.
Exp Parasitol. 2018 Mar;186:10-16. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2018.01.016. Epub 2018 Feb 4.
9
Comparison of DNA extraction methods for human gut microbial community profiling.
Syst Appl Microbiol. 2018 Mar;41(2):151-157. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2017.11.008. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
10
Laboratory diagnosis of soil transmitted helminthiasis.
Trop Parasitol. 2017 Jul-Dec;7(2):86-91. doi: 10.4103/tp.TP_29_17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验