Gao Jie, Li Chunhai, Wu Yitao, Zhu Xinyong, Liu Siqin, Zhang Yang, Pang Huizhong, Li Jiaheng, Liu Jiawen, Zhao Wangsheng, Wang Ye, Kou Jie
Sichuan Key Laboratory of Conservation Biology on Endangered Wildlife Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding Chengdu Sichuan China.
College of Life Sciences and Engineering Southwest University of Science and Technology Mianyang Sichuan China.
Ecol Evol. 2025 Apr 8;15(4):e71242. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71242. eCollection 2025 Apr.
Genetic analysis of short tandem repeat (STR) loci using noninvasive fecal samples is currently the most widely used method in genetic surveys of giant pandas (). However, low-quality fecal DNA obtained from fecal samples may affect the accuracy of short tandem repeat (STR) genotyping results and pose a challenge to accurately identify individuals. The aim of this study was thus to compare the efficiency of DNA extraction kits in obtaining high-quality fecal host DNA from giant panda fecal samples. In this study, six commercial kits widely used in fecal DNA extraction, the QIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit (Q kit), Beaver Beads Stool DNA Kit (H kit), Mag-MK Soil & Stool Genome DNA Extraction kit (S kit), Magnetic Soil And Stool DNA Kit (T kit), E.Z.N.A Mag-Bind Stool DNA Kit (O kit) and Mag Beads Fast DNA Kit for Feces (M kit) were compared. Fecal DNA concentration and purity were measured, and STR genotyping was performed using blood and fecal DNA from captive giant pandas to compare the genotype matches at 11 STR loci. Our results show that the most efficient extraction kits were the Q and T kits, and the Q kit had a greater ability to remove PCR inhibitors than other kits. Careful selection of DNA extraction kits is required to achieve optimal genotyping accuracy across different STR genotyping systems. For STR genotyping systems with smaller PCR product sizes (< 200 bp, such as GPL-29, GP-08, GP-01, Panda-40 and Panda-05), all six kits demonstrated high genotype matching rates (GMR > 80%). In contrast, for STR genotyping systems with longer PCR product sizes (> 200 bp), the choice of DNA extraction kit significantly influenced GMR, with the H kit and O kit performing well for gpy-5 but the Q kit and O kit being less suitable for GPL-08.
利用非侵入性粪便样本对短串联重复序列(STR)位点进行基因分析,是目前大熊猫基因调查中应用最广泛的方法。然而,从粪便样本中获得的低质量粪便DNA可能会影响短串联重复序列(STR)基因分型结果的准确性,对准确识别个体构成挑战。因此,本研究的目的是比较DNA提取试剂盒从大熊猫粪便样本中获取高质量粪便宿主DNA的效率。在本研究中,比较了六种广泛用于粪便DNA提取的商业试剂盒,即QIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit(Q试剂盒)、Beaver Beads Stool DNA Kit(H试剂盒)、Mag-MK Soil & Stool Genome DNA Extraction kit(S试剂盒)、Magnetic Soil And Stool DNA Kit(T试剂盒)、E.Z.N.A Mag-Bind Stool DNA Kit(O试剂盒)和Mag Beads Fast DNA Kit for Feces(M试剂盒)。测量了粪便DNA的浓度和纯度,并使用圈养大熊猫的血液和粪便DNA进行STR基因分型,以比较11个STR位点的基因型匹配情况。我们的结果表明,最有效的提取试剂盒是Q试剂盒和T试剂盒,并且Q试剂盒比其他试剂盒具有更强的去除PCR抑制剂的能力。为了在不同的STR基因分型系统中实现最佳的基因分型准确性,需要仔细选择DNA提取试剂盒。对于PCR产物尺寸较小(<200 bp,如GPL-29、GP-08、GP-01、Panda-40和Panda-05)的STR基因分型系统,所有六种试剂盒均表现出较高的基因型匹配率(GMR>80%)。相比之下,对于PCR产物尺寸较长(>200 bp)的STR基因分型系统,DNA提取试剂盒的选择对GMR有显著影响,H试剂盒和O试剂盒对gpy-5表现良好,但Q试剂盒和O试剂盒不太适合GPL-08。