• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

某些物种核 DNA 含量的估算:最好使用流式细胞术进行分析。

Estimation of Nuclear DNA Content in Some Species: Best Analyzed Using Flow Cytometry.

机构信息

Department of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Van 65090, Turkey.

Department of Microbiology, PSGVP Mandal's S I Patil Arts, G B Patel Science and STKV Sangh Commerce College, Shahada 425409, India.

出版信息

Genes (Basel). 2022 Oct 29;13(11):1980. doi: 10.3390/genes13111980.

DOI:10.3390/genes13111980
PMID:36360216
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9690501/
Abstract

The genera and have been considered as the main gene pool of wheat due to their features, such as tolerance of all types of abiotic and biotic stresses. This study was conducted to evaluate the cytogenetic analyses in 115 native and wild populations from eleven species using their nuclear DNA quantification. Mean 2C nuclear DNA contents of different ploidy levels in the wild wheat of Turkey and Iran were measured using the flow cytometry technique. The obtained results showed that the mean nuclear DNA content in diploid species varied from 10.09 pg/2C () to 10.95 pg/2C ( var. ) in Turkey. In Iranian diploids, the mean nuclear DNA content varied from 10.20 pg/2C () to 11.56 pg/2C ( var. ). This index in the tetraploid species of Turkey varied from 18.09 pg/2C () to 21.65 pg/2C (), and in Iranian species, it was from 18.61 pg/2C () to 21.75 pg/2C (). On the other hand, in the hexaploid species of Turkey, this index varied from 31.59 pg/2C () to 31.81 pg/2C (); in the Iranian species, it varied from 32.58 pg/2C () to 33.97 pg/2C (). There was a significant difference in the DNA content of Turkey and Iran diploid as well as tetraploid species; however, in hexaploid species, the difference was not significant. It was concluded that the variation in intraspecific genome size was very low in diploid and tetraploid populations; this means that the low variation is not dependent on geographic and climatic parameters. On the other hand, the interspecific variation is significant at the diploid and tetraploid populations. It is generally very difficult to distinguish species from each other in natural conditions; meanwhile, in this study, all species could be, easily, quickly and unambiguously, distinguished and separated using the FCM technique.

摘要

由于其特征,如对各种非生物和生物胁迫的耐受性, 和 属被认为是小麦的主要基因库。本研究通过核 DNA 定量评估了来自 11 个种的 115 个本地和野生群体的细胞遗传学分析。使用流式细胞术技术测量了来自土耳其和伊朗的野生小麦不同倍性水平的平均 2C 核 DNA 含量。在土耳其的二倍体物种中,平均核 DNA 含量从 10.09 pg/2C( )到 10.95 pg/2C( var. )不等。在伊朗的二倍体中,平均核 DNA 含量从 10.20 pg/2C( )到 11.56 pg/2C( var. )不等。在土耳其的四倍体物种中,这个指数从 18.09 pg/2C( )到 21.65 pg/2C( )不等,而在伊朗的物种中,这个指数从 18.61 pg/2C( )到 21.75 pg/2C( )不等。另一方面,在土耳其的六倍体物种中,这个指数从 31.59 pg/2C( )到 31.81 pg/2C( )不等;在伊朗的物种中,这个指数从 32.58 pg/2C( )到 33.97 pg/2C( )不等。土耳其和伊朗的二倍体和四倍体物种的 DNA 含量存在显著差异;然而,在六倍体物种中,差异不显著。结论是,二倍体和四倍体群体中种内基因组大小的变异非常低;这意味着低变异不依赖于地理和气候参数。另一方面,在二倍体和四倍体群体中,种间变异是显著的。在自然条件下,通常很难将 种彼此区分开来;然而,在这项研究中,所有的物种都可以使用 FCM 技术快速、准确和明确地区分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/91f0deaddb97/genes-13-01980-g022.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/2f5e1859f15d/genes-13-01980-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/b48acc43925d/genes-13-01980-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/db469a806e2a/genes-13-01980-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/807ca273d924/genes-13-01980-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/d1bb30b20de5/genes-13-01980-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/abb06f5f4b11/genes-13-01980-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/32b0259238b4/genes-13-01980-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/32dd4c53200f/genes-13-01980-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/f5e20690630e/genes-13-01980-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/337a61a6166e/genes-13-01980-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/a76cccd81086/genes-13-01980-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/84c49bc0e212/genes-13-01980-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/2b98904ab4ce/genes-13-01980-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/f9e9b7e67e2a/genes-13-01980-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/30e77f1828f3/genes-13-01980-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/5548194475ef/genes-13-01980-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/454bf9bf82e3/genes-13-01980-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/b18397d4d590/genes-13-01980-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/3602ee39e457/genes-13-01980-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/2cdbc75d90b0/genes-13-01980-g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/f0fbb8f5f450/genes-13-01980-g021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/91f0deaddb97/genes-13-01980-g022.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/2f5e1859f15d/genes-13-01980-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/b48acc43925d/genes-13-01980-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/db469a806e2a/genes-13-01980-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/807ca273d924/genes-13-01980-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/d1bb30b20de5/genes-13-01980-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/abb06f5f4b11/genes-13-01980-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/32b0259238b4/genes-13-01980-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/32dd4c53200f/genes-13-01980-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/f5e20690630e/genes-13-01980-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/337a61a6166e/genes-13-01980-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/a76cccd81086/genes-13-01980-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/84c49bc0e212/genes-13-01980-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/2b98904ab4ce/genes-13-01980-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/f9e9b7e67e2a/genes-13-01980-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/30e77f1828f3/genes-13-01980-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/5548194475ef/genes-13-01980-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/454bf9bf82e3/genes-13-01980-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/b18397d4d590/genes-13-01980-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/3602ee39e457/genes-13-01980-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/2cdbc75d90b0/genes-13-01980-g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/f0fbb8f5f450/genes-13-01980-g021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9690501/91f0deaddb97/genes-13-01980-g022.jpg

相似文献

1
Estimation of Nuclear DNA Content in Some Species: Best Analyzed Using Flow Cytometry.某些物种核 DNA 含量的估算:最好使用流式细胞术进行分析。
Genes (Basel). 2022 Oct 29;13(11):1980. doi: 10.3390/genes13111980.
2
[RAPD analysis of the intraspecific and interspecific variation and phylogenetic relationships of Aegilops L. species with the U genome].[具有U基因组的山羊草属物种种内和种间变异及系统发育关系的随机扩增多态性DNA分析]
Genetika. 2010 Jul;46(7):945-59.
3
[Evaluation of phylogenetic relationships between five polyploid Aegilops L. species of the U-genome cluster by means of chromosomal analysis].[通过染色体分析评估U基因组簇的五个多倍体山羊草属物种之间的系统发育关系]
Genetika. 2002 Jun;38(6):799-811.
4
Phenotypic effects of the U-genome variation in nascent synthetic hexaploids derived from interspecific crosses between durum wheat and its diploid relative Aegilops umbellulata.初生合成六倍体杂种中 U 基因组变异的表型效应,其源自硬粒小麦与其二倍体近缘种节节麦的种间杂交。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 2;15(4):e0231129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231129. eCollection 2020.
5
Broadening the bread wheat D genome.拓宽普通小麦 D 基因组。
Theor Appl Genet. 2019 May;132(5):1295-1307. doi: 10.1007/s00122-019-03299-z. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
6
Quantification and organization of WIS2-1A and BARE-1 retrotransposons in different genomes of Triticum and Aegilops species.小麦属和山羊草属不同基因组中WIS2 - 1A和BARE - 1逆转座子的定量与组织
Mol Genet Genomics. 2009 Sep;282(3):245-55. doi: 10.1007/s00438-009-0462-6. Epub 2009 Jun 19.
7
Flow sorting of C-genome chromosomes from wild relatives of wheat Aegilops markgrafii, Ae. triuncialis and Ae. cylindrica, and their molecular organization.从小麦野生近缘种马克格拉夫山羊草(Aegilops markgrafii)、三芒山羊草(Ae. triuncialis)和圆柱山羊草(Ae. cylindrica)中对C基因组染色体进行流式分选及其分子组织
Ann Bot. 2015 Aug;116(2):189-200. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcv073. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
8
[Phylogenetic relationships and intraspecific variation of D-genome Aegilops L. as revealed by RAPD analysis].[RAPD分析揭示的D基因组山羊草属植物的系统发育关系和种内变异]
Genetika. 2004 May;40(5):642-51.
9
Diploid genome differentiation conferred by RNA sequencing-based survey of genome-wide polymorphisms throughout homoeologous loci in Triticum and Aegilops.基于 RNA 测序的全基因组同源位点多态性调查,揭示小麦和山羊草中二倍体基因组分化。
BMC Genomics. 2020 Mar 20;21(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-6664-3.
10
Multiple origins of U genome in two UM genome tetraploid Aegilops species, Ae. columnaris and Ae. triaristata, revealed based on the polymorphism of a genome-specific PCR fragment.基于基因组特异性PCR片段的多态性揭示了两个具UM基因组的四倍体山羊草物种(柱穗山羊草和三芒山羊草)中U基因组的多个起源。
Genes Genet Syst. 2005 Apr;80(2):105-11. doi: 10.1266/ggs.80.105.

引用本文的文献

1
Cytotypes in Some Regions of Türkiye.土耳其部分地区的细胞类型
Plants (Basel). 2024 Nov 3;13(21):3096. doi: 10.3390/plants13213096.
2
Analysis of Nuclear DNA Content and Karyotype of L.分析 L. 的核 DNA 含量和核型
Genes (Basel). 2022 Dec 23;14(1):47. doi: 10.3390/genes14010047.

本文引用的文献

1
Environmental DNA Metabarcoding: A Novel Contrivance for Documenting Terrestrial Biodiversity.环境DNA宏条形码技术:一种记录陆地生物多样性的新方法。
Biology (Basel). 2022 Aug 31;11(9):1297. doi: 10.3390/biology11091297.
2
A Critical Assessment of the Congruency between Environmental DNA and Palaeoecology for the Biodiversity Monitoring and Palaeoenvironmental Reconstruction.对环境 DNA 与古生态学在生物多样性监测和古环境重建方面的一致性进行批判性评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 1;19(15):9445. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159445.
3
Reference standards for flow cytometric estimation of absolute nuclear DNA content in plants.
流式细胞术估计植物绝对核 DNA 含量的参考标准。
Cytometry A. 2022 Sep;101(9):710-724. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.24495. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
4
Cultivated Ancient Wheats (Triticum spp.): A Potential Source of Health-Beneficial Food Products.栽培古老小麦(小麦属):有益健康食品的潜在来源。
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2017 May;16(3):477-488. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12262. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
5
Impacts of Mist Spray on Rice Field Micrometeorology and Rice Yield under Heat Stress Condition.喷雾弥雾对热胁迫条件下稻田微气象和水稻产量的影响。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 31;10(1):1579. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58578-3.
6
The role of irrigation in changing wheat yields and heat sensitivity in India.灌溉在改变印度小麦产量和耐热性方面的作用。
Nat Commun. 2019 Sep 12;10(1):4144. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12183-9.
7
The origin of Triticum spelta and its free-threshing hexaploid relatives.斯佩尔特小麦及其易脱粒六倍体近缘种的起源。
J Hered. 1946 Mar;37:81 107. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a105590.
8
2C or not 2C: a closer look at cell nuclei and their DNA content.二倍体还是非二倍体:更深入探究细胞核及其DNA含量
Chromosoma. 2009 Jun;118(3):391-400. doi: 10.1007/s00412-009-0205-9. Epub 2009 Feb 26.
9
Nuclear DNA amount and genome downsizing in natural and synthetic allopolyploids of the genera Aegilops and Triticum.山羊草属和小麦属天然及人工合成异源多倍体的核DNA含量与基因组减小
Genome. 2008 Aug;51(8):616-27. doi: 10.1139/G08-043.
10
Genome size and genome evolution in diploid Triticeae species.二倍体小麦族物种的基因组大小与基因组进化
Genome. 2007 Nov;50(11):1029-37. doi: 10.1139/g07-083.