Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.
School of Journalism and Communication, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 22;19(21):13737. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113737.
In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, improving the public's understanding of the increased efficacy and safety of the COVID-19 vaccines through scientific risk communication campaigns, promoting the public's acceptance and willingness to receive COVID-19 vaccines, and forming collective actions at the social level will deeply impact on the effect of COVID-19 prevention in various countries, which is also a key factor that governments need to address urgently. Previous research on risk communication has mostly focused on microscopic perspectives of how to stimulate individual self-protection behaviors by awakening threat and efficacy perceptions; however, a lack of observation of social collective actions means there is a risk of failure regarding COVID-19 epidemic reduction and prevention. In this regard, this study was based on the issue of vaccination in the context of the COVID-19 epidemic through a highly regulated and controlled research experiment in China ( = 165), which was designed to examine the impact of two risk communication frameworks, appealing to individual fears and appealing to social norms, on the public's acceptance and recommendations of COVID-19 vaccines, thus outlining the path of action from individual protection to collective epidemic prevention. Both the "fear appeals" framework and the "social norms" framework were found to have a positive effect on the Chinese public's vaccination acceptance. Specifically, social norms information may increase vaccination acceptance by enhancing the public's perceptions of social responsibility, while fear appeals information may reduce their perceptions of threat and social pressure to get the vaccine. Female and highly educated groups were more likely to refuse to recommend vaccination after reading the risk communication information. These results can be a useful supplement to the theory and practice of risk communication.
在 COVID-19 大流行的背景下,通过科学的风险沟通活动提高公众对 COVID-19 疫苗更高的有效性和安全性的认识,促进公众对 COVID-19 疫苗的接受度和意愿,并在社会层面形成集体行动,这将对各国 COVID-19 防控效果产生深远影响,也是各国政府亟待解决的关键因素。先前的风险沟通研究大多集中在如何通过唤起威胁和效能感知来刺激个体的自我保护行为这一微观视角上;然而,缺乏对社会集体行动的观察意味着在减少和预防 COVID-19 疫情方面存在失败的风险。在这方面,本研究通过在中国(n = 165)进行的一项高度规范和受控的研究实验,针对 COVID-19 大流行背景下的疫苗接种问题,检验了两种风险沟通框架(诉诸个体恐惧和诉诸社会规范)对公众对 COVID-19 疫苗的接受度和推荐意愿的影响,从而勾勒出从个体保护到集体防疫的行动路径。“恐惧诉求”框架和“社会规范”框架都对中国公众的疫苗接种接受度产生了积极影响。具体来说,社会规范信息可能通过增强公众的社会责任感知来提高疫苗接种接受度,而恐惧诉求信息可能降低他们对威胁和接种疫苗的社会压力的感知。阅读风险沟通信息后,女性和受教育程度较高的群体更有可能拒绝推荐接种疫苗。这些结果可以为风险沟通的理论和实践提供有益的补充。