• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进还是抑制?——中国农村土地发展权流转政策对农民收入的影响研究:来自重庆的案例分析。

Promote or Demote? Investigating the Impacts of China's Transferable Development Rights Program on Farmers' Income: A Case Study from Chongqing.

机构信息

School of Political Science and Public Administration, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China.

Centre for Quality of Life and Public Policy Research, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 22;19(21):13751. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113751.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph192113751
PMID:36360628
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9653643/
Abstract

China has been undergoing rapid urbanization and industrialization process since the adoption of economic reform and open-door policy in 1978, which is leading to tremendous urban growth and encroachment on rural farmland. To address the conflicts between urban development and farmland protection, the Chinese government introduced the transferable development rights (TDR) program named the Link Policy, and it was popularized nationwide given the tremendous land revenue from policy implementation. However, as farmers are the key stakeholders, the impacts of the policy on farmers' income need to be examined and justified. Thus, this paper aims to fill this gap by taking Chongqing as a case study. The synthetic control method was introduced to construct a synthetic Chongqing without the policy implementation using the 49 municipal cities and Chongqing during 2000-2017. Findings from the analysis indicate that Chongqing's TDR program significantly promoted farmers' income at the beginning of the policy implementation, while the positive impacts became weak afterward. Based on these findings, a few policy suggestions including a fair revenue distribution scheme and protection of farmers' land use rights are offered to facilitate the policy implementation and increase farmers' household income in the coming future.

摘要

自 1978 年中国实行经济改革和开放政策以来,一直处于快速的城市化和工业化进程中,这导致了城市的巨大增长和对农村农田的侵占。为了解决城市发展和农田保护之间的冲突,中国政府引入了可转让发展权(TDR)计划,即“挂钩政策”,并在全国范围内推广,因为该政策的实施带来了巨大的土地收益。然而,由于农民是关键利益相关者,因此需要对政策对农民收入的影响进行检验和证明。因此,本文以重庆市为例,旨在填补这一空白。采用合成控制法,利用 2000-2017 年重庆市 49 个市和重庆市的数据,构建了一个没有政策实施的合成重庆市。分析结果表明,重庆市 TDR 计划在政策实施初期显著促进了农民的收入,而随后的积极影响逐渐减弱。基于这些发现,本文提出了一些政策建议,包括公平的收益分配方案和保护农民的土地使用权,以促进政策的实施,并在未来增加农民的家庭收入。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ae/9653643/25270fd190ca/ijerph-19-13751-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ae/9653643/7c46e70791bf/ijerph-19-13751-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ae/9653643/89355d4c13be/ijerph-19-13751-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ae/9653643/710b56a1a3f9/ijerph-19-13751-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ae/9653643/aea87faccd7e/ijerph-19-13751-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ae/9653643/8f64cb257175/ijerph-19-13751-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ae/9653643/25270fd190ca/ijerph-19-13751-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ae/9653643/7c46e70791bf/ijerph-19-13751-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ae/9653643/89355d4c13be/ijerph-19-13751-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ae/9653643/710b56a1a3f9/ijerph-19-13751-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ae/9653643/aea87faccd7e/ijerph-19-13751-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ae/9653643/8f64cb257175/ijerph-19-13751-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ae/9653643/25270fd190ca/ijerph-19-13751-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Promote or Demote? Investigating the Impacts of China's Transferable Development Rights Program on Farmers' Income: A Case Study from Chongqing.促进还是抑制?——中国农村土地发展权流转政策对农民收入的影响研究:来自重庆的案例分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 22;19(21):13751. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113751.
2
From Fragmentation to Intensification: Land Reform in China's "New Era".从碎片化到强化:中国“新时代”的土地改革。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 7;19(18):11223. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811223.
3
Organization model, vertical integration, and farmers' income growth: Empirical evidence from large-scale farmers in Lin'an, China.组织模式、纵向一体化与农户增收——来自中国临安大规模经营农户的证据。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 2;16(6):e0252482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252482. eCollection 2021.
4
Spatiotemporal evolution and driving factors of agricultural land transfer in China.中国农地流转的时空演变及其驱动因素。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 18;19(9):e0310532. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310532. eCollection 2024.
5
Whether the Agricultural Insurance Policy Achieves Green Income Growth-Evidence from the Implementation of China's Total Cost Insurance Pilot Program.农业保险政策能否实现绿色增收——来自中国完全成本保险试点项目实施的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 13;19(2):852. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020852.
6
Understanding the Farmland Rights Confirmation Policy from the Perspective of Farmers: Evidence from Jiangxi, China.从农民视角理解农地确权政策:来自中国江西的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 8;19(18):11295. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811295.
7
Influence of farmland confirmation on farmland abandonment in China.耕地确认对中国耕地撂荒的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 May 4;18(5):e0285174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285174. eCollection 2023.
8
Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity of Urban Land Expansion and Urban Population Growth under New Urbanization: A Case Study of Chongqing.新型城镇化背景下城市土地扩张与城市人口增长的时空分异——以重庆市为例
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 25;19(13):7792. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137792.
9
Exploring the Role of Land Transfer and Social Capital in Improving Agricultural Income under the Background of Rural Revitalization.探讨农村振兴背景下土地流转和社会资本对提高农业收入的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 19;19(24):17077. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192417077.
10
Determinants of Farmland Abandonment on the Urban-Rural Fringe.城乡边缘区耕地撂荒的决定因素。
Environ Manage. 2020 Mar;65(3):369-384. doi: 10.1007/s00267-020-01258-9. Epub 2020 Feb 8.