• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Relationship Health and Intimate Partner Violence in Integrated Primary Care: Individual Characteristics and Preferences for Relationship Support across Risk Levels.综合初级保健中的关系健康和亲密伴侣暴力:不同风险水平的个体特征和关系支持偏好。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 27;19(21):13984. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113984.
2
Understanding Veterans' intimate partner violence use and patterns of healthcare utilization.了解退伍军人亲密伴侣暴力使用情况和医疗保健利用模式。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec;58(6):1198-1208. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14201. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
3
Evaluation of the Strength at Home Group Intervention for Intimate Partner Violence in the Veterans Affairs Health System.家庭强化组干预对退伍军人事务部卫生系统中亲密伴侣暴力的效果评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e232997. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.2997.
4
Intimate Partner Violence Between Male Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans and Their Female Partners Who Seek Couples Therapy.伊拉克和阿富汗男性退伍军人与其寻求夫妻治疗的女性伴侣之间的亲密伴侣暴力。
J Interpers Violence. 2016 Mar;31(6):1095-115. doi: 10.1177/0886260514564067. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
5
Assessing the Veterans Health Administration's response to intimate partner violence among women: protocol for a randomized hybrid type 2 implementation-effectiveness trial.评估退伍军人健康管理局针对女性亲密伴侣暴力的反应:一项随机混合 2 型实施有效性试验的方案。
Implement Sci. 2020 May 7;15(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-0969-0.
6
Intimate Partner Violence Screening in the Veterans Health Administration: Demographic and Military Service Characteristics.在退伍军人健康管理局进行亲密伴侣暴力筛查:人口统计学和军事服务特征。
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Jun;52(6):761-768. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.003. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
7
Intimate Partner Violence and Current Mental Health Needs Among Female Veterans.女性退伍军人中的亲密伴侣暴力与当前心理健康需求
J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 Nov-Dec;28(6):772-6. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.06.150154.
8
Traumatic brain injury among women veterans: an invisible wound of intimate partner violence.女性退伍军人中的创伤性脑损伤:亲密伴侣暴力造成的无形创伤。
Med Care. 2015 Apr;53(4 Suppl 1):S112-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000263.
9
Intimate Partner Violence Victimization and Associated Implications for Health and Functioning Among Male and Female Post-9/11 Veterans.9·11事件后退伍军人中亲密伴侣暴力受害情况及其对健康和功能的相关影响,涉及男性和女性退伍军人。
Med Care. 2017 Sep;55 Suppl 9 Suppl 2:S78-S84. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000741.
10
Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration Among Military Spouses.亲密伴侣暴力侵害军人配偶行为。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Aug;37(15-16):NP13497-NP13517. doi: 10.1177/08862605211004139. Epub 2021 Apr 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Maintaining relationship safety while promoting relationship health: Family service referrals among veterans screened for intimate partner violence.在促进关系健康的同时维护关系安全:对接受亲密伴侣暴力筛查的退伍军人进行家庭服务转介。
Psychol Serv. 2025 Aug 21. doi: 10.1037/ser0000990.
2
Brief relationship support as a selective suicide prevention intervention: Piloting the Relationship Checkup in veteran couples with relationship and mental health concerns.简要关系支持作为一种有选择性的自杀预防干预措施:在有恋爱关系和心理健康问题的退伍军人夫妇中试用恋爱关系检查。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2023 Oct;53(5):787-801. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12983. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
3
Understanding Veterans' intimate partner violence use and patterns of healthcare utilization.了解退伍军人亲密伴侣暴力使用情况和医疗保健利用模式。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec;58(6):1198-1208. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14201. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
4
Leveraging Integrated Primary Care to Enhance the Health System Response to IPV: Moving toward Primary Prevention Primary Care.利用综合初级保健加强应对亲密伴侣暴力的卫生系统反应:迈向初级预防初级保健。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 May 1;20(9):5701. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20095701.

本文引用的文献

1
The Before Baby Relationship Checkup: A Couples-Based Intervention to Reduce Relationship Risk Factors for Perinatal Mood and Anxiety Disorders.孕前关系检查:一种基于夫妻的干预措施,用于降低围产期情绪和焦虑障碍的关系风险因素。
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2022 Jun;29(2):295-309. doi: 10.1007/s10880-021-09819-8. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
2
High sensitivity and specificity screening for clinically significant intimate partner violence.高灵敏度和特异性筛选具有临床意义的亲密伴侣暴力。
J Fam Psychol. 2021 Feb;35(1):80-91. doi: 10.1037/fam0000781. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
3
Meta-analysis of couple therapy: Effects across outcomes, designs, timeframes, and other moderators.元分析夫妻治疗:结果、设计、时间框架和其他调节因素的影响。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2020 Jul;88(7):583-596. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000514.
4
Brief Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration Screening Tools: A Scoping Review.简要亲密伴侣暴力行为筛查工具:范围综述。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2021 Oct;22(4):900-913. doi: 10.1177/1524838019888545. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
5
Intimate Partner Violence Screening Programs in the Veterans Health Administration: Informing Scale-up of Successful Practices.退伍军人事务部的亲密伴侣暴力筛查项目:为成功实践的推广提供信息。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Nov;34(11):2435-2442. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05240-y. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
6
Meta-analysis and systematic review for the treatment of perpetrators of intimate partner violence.元分析和系统评价治疗亲密伴侣暴力的施害者。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Oct;105:220-230. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.08.006. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
7
Functional concerns and treatment priorities among veterans receiving VHA Primary Care Behavioral Health services.接受退伍军人健康管理局初级保健行为健康服务的退伍军人的功能问题和治疗重点。
Fam Syst Health. 2019 Mar;37(1):68-73. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000393. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
8
Screening for Intimate Partner Violence, Elder Abuse, and Abuse of Vulnerable Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Final Recommendation Statement.筛查亲密伴侣暴力、虐待老人和虐待弱势成年人:美国预防服务工作组最终推荐声明。
JAMA. 2018 Oct 23;320(16):1678-1687. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.14741.
9
Addressing Intimate Partner Violence and Abuse of Older or Vulnerable Adults in the Health Care Setting-Beyond Screening.在医疗环境中应对亲密伴侣暴力以及对老年人或弱势群体的虐待——超越筛查。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Dec 1;178(12):1583-1585. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.6523.
10
Accuracy and Acceptability of a Screening Tool for Identifying Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration among Women Veterans: A Pre-Implementation Evaluation.用于识别女性退伍军人中亲密伴侣暴力行为的筛查工具的准确性和可接受性:实施前评估。
Womens Health Issues. 2018 Sep-Oct;28(5):439-445. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2018.04.003. Epub 2018 Jun 7.

综合初级保健中的关系健康和亲密伴侣暴力:不同风险水平的个体特征和关系支持偏好。

Relationship Health and Intimate Partner Violence in Integrated Primary Care: Individual Characteristics and Preferences for Relationship Support across Risk Levels.

机构信息

Center of Excellence for Suicide Prevention, Department of Veterans Affairs, Canandaigua, NY 14424, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 27;19(21):13984. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113984.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph192113984
PMID:36360867
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9654718/
Abstract

This study explores differences in characteristics and relationship treatment preferences across different levels of intimate partner violence (IPV) among Veterans Affairs (VA) primary care patients. In Fall 2019, we sent a mail-in survey assessing relationship healthcare needs to N = 299 Veterans randomly sampled from 20 northeastern VA primary care clinics (oversampling female and younger Veterans). We compared those reporting past year use or experience of physical/sexual aggression, threats/coercion, or injury (Severe IPV; 21%), to those only reporting yelling and screaming (Verbal Conflict; 51%), and denying any IPV (No IPV; 28%). Participants across groups desired 2-6 sessions of face-to-face support for couples' health and communication. No IPV participants were older and had preferred treatment in primary care. The Verbal Conflict and Severe IPV groups were both flagged by IPV screens and had similar interest in couple treatment and relationship evaluation. The Severe IPV group had higher rates of harms (e.g., depression, alcohol use disorder, relationship dissatisfaction, fear of partner) and higher interest in addressing safety outside of VA. Exploratory analyses suggested differences based on use vs. experience of Severe IPV. Findings highlight ways integrated primary care teams can differentiate services to address dissatisfaction and conflict while facilitating referrals for Severe IPV.

摘要

本研究探讨了退伍军人事务部(VA)初级保健患者中不同程度亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的特征和关系处理偏好的差异。在 2019 年秋季,我们向从 20 家东北 VA 初级保健诊所随机抽取的 N = 299 名退伍军人发送了一份邮件调查,评估他们的关系医疗保健需求(对女性和年轻退伍军人进行了超额抽样)。我们将那些报告过去一年有身体/性攻击、威胁/胁迫或受伤经历(严重 IPV;21%)的人与那些只报告大喊大叫(言语冲突;51%)和否认任何 IPV(无 IPV;28%)的人进行了比较。各组参与者都希望进行 2-6 次面对面的夫妻健康和沟通支持。无 IPV 参与者年龄较大,更喜欢在初级保健中接受治疗。言语冲突和严重 IPV 组都通过 IPV 筛查标记,并对夫妻治疗和关系评估有类似的兴趣。严重 IPV 组的伤害率(如抑郁、酒精使用障碍、关系不满、对伴侣的恐惧)更高,对在 VA 之外解决安全问题的兴趣更高。探索性分析根据严重 IPV 的使用和经历表明存在差异。研究结果强调了综合初级保健团队可以区分服务以解决不满和冲突,同时促进严重 IPV 的转介的方式。