• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

元分析夫妻治疗:结果、设计、时间框架和其他调节因素的影响。

Meta-analysis of couple therapy: Effects across outcomes, designs, timeframes, and other moderators.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 2020 Jul;88(7):583-596. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000514.

DOI:10.1037/ccp0000514
PMID:32551734
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study updated existing meta-analyses of couple therapy that typically do not include multiple treatment modalities, various research designs, long-term outcomes, or recent studies. Eligibility Criteria: Studies published in English that reported relationship satisfaction or other outcomes of couple therapy were included; over 70% of studies have not been included in previous meta-analyses. Methods of Synthesis: Using random effects models across 58 studies representing 40 unique samples and 2,092 couples, effect sizes were summarized within measure domains as mean gains for treatment groups and waitlist groups as well as between-groups comparisons.

RESULTS

Couple therapy has a large effect on relationship satisfaction (pre to post within-group Hedges ḡ = 1.12, CI [0.92, 1.31], p < .001) and couples assigned to waitlists do not significantly improve (pre-to-post within-group satisfaction Hedges ḡ = 0.12, CI [-0.04, 0.29], p > .05). Additionally, couple therapy has significant impacts on key domains including self-reported and observed communication, emotional intimacy, and partner behaviors. Moderation analyses of pre-to-post gains in relationship satisfaction for treatment groups were generally nonsignificant; however, greater baseline distress was associated with larger gains.

CONCLUSIONS

Couple therapy has large effects on key relationship domains and gains are generally maintained over short- and long-term follow-up with minimal impact of tested moderators. Limitations include sample of exclusively opposite sex couples and inability to fully model dependencies within studies. The relationship between mean gain effect sizes and between-groups comparisons is discussed with implications for future research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

目的

本研究更新了现有的夫妻治疗元分析,这些元分析通常不包括多种治疗方式、各种研究设计、长期结果或近期研究。

入选标准

纳入发表于英文期刊、报告夫妻治疗的关系满意度或其他结果的研究;超过 70%的研究未包含在前述元分析中。

综合方法

对 58 项研究进行随机效应模型分析,这些研究代表了 40 个独特的样本和 2092 对夫妇,在测量领域内总结了治疗组和候补组的效应大小,即治疗组和候补组的平均增益以及组间比较。

结果

夫妻治疗对关系满意度有显著影响(组内前后比较 Hedges ḡ=1.12,CI[0.92,1.31],p<0.001),而被分配到候补组的夫妇并没有显著改善(组内前后比较满意度 Hedges ḡ=0.12,CI[-0.04,0.29],p>0.05)。此外,夫妻治疗对关键领域如自我报告和观察到的沟通、情感亲密和伴侣行为也有显著影响。治疗组的关系满意度的治疗前后增益的调节分析通常不显著;然而,基线时的较高困扰与较大的增益相关。

结论

夫妻治疗对关键的关系领域有显著影响,且增益在短期和长期随访中基本保持,受测试的调节因素影响较小。局限性包括研究中仅纳入异性夫妻样本以及无法完全建立研究内的依存关系。讨论了平均增益效应大小与组间比较之间的关系,并对未来研究提出了启示。

相似文献

1
Meta-analysis of couple therapy: Effects across outcomes, designs, timeframes, and other moderators.元分析夫妻治疗:结果、设计、时间框架和其他调节因素的影响。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2020 Jul;88(7):583-596. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000514.
2
Mechanisms of change in a brief, online relationship intervention.简短在线关系干预中改变的机制。
J Fam Psychol. 2020 Feb;34(1):57-67. doi: 10.1037/fam0000569. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
3
Profiles of Low-Income Help-Seeking Couples and Implications for Intervention Gains: A Couple-Centered Approach.低收入求助夫妇的特征及对干预效果的启示:以夫妇为中心的方法。
Behav Ther. 2024 May;55(3):443-456. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2023.08.002. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
4
Mechanisms of improvements and maintenance in online relationship programs for distressed low-income couples.在线关系项目改善和维持机制:为贫困低收入夫妇提供帮助。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2020 Dec;88(12):1091-1104. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000616.
5
Improvements in closeness, communication, and psychological distress mediate effects of couple therapy for veterans.亲密感、沟通和心理困扰的改善介导了针对退伍军人的夫妻治疗的效果。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Apr;83(2):405-15. doi: 10.1037/a0038541. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
6
The alliance in relationship education programs.关系教育项目中的联盟。
J Marital Fam Ther. 2014 Apr;40(2):178-92. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12019. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
7
Online programs improve relationship functioning for distressed low-income couples: Results from a nationwide randomized controlled trial.在线项目改善了贫困低收入夫妇的关系功能:一项全国性随机对照试验的结果。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2020 Apr;88(4):283-294. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000479.
8
Consensus and relationship distress before and after a brief couples' intervention.夫妻简短干预前后的共识和关系困扰。
J Fam Psychol. 2020 Feb;34(1):128-134. doi: 10.1037/fam0000577. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
9
The Effects of a Couples-Based Health Behavior Intervention During Pregnancy on Latino Couples' Dyadic Satisfaction Postpartum.孕期基于伴侣的健康行为干预对拉丁裔夫妇产后二元满意度的影响。
Fam Process. 2018 Sep;57(3):629-648. doi: 10.1111/famp.12354. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
10
Emotion dysregulation and couple relationship satisfaction of clinical couples: An actor-partner interdependence model.临床夫妻的情绪调节与夫妻关系满意度:一种主体间相互依赖模型。
Fam Process. 2023 Dec;62(4):1555-1573. doi: 10.1111/famp.12828. Epub 2022 Oct 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Maintaining relationship safety while promoting relationship health: Family service referrals among veterans screened for intimate partner violence.在促进关系健康的同时维护关系安全:对接受亲密伴侣暴力筛查的退伍军人进行家庭服务转介。
Psychol Serv. 2025 Aug 21. doi: 10.1037/ser0000990.
2
Mapping love: a personality-centered network analysis of relationship satisfaction.描绘爱情:基于人格的关系满意度网络分析
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 21;16:1587405. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1587405. eCollection 2025.
3
Relationship intervention moderates the association between substance use and biological aging among Black adults.
关系干预可调节黑人成年人物质使用与生物衰老之间的关联。
Health Psychol. 2025 Sep;44(9):844-853. doi: 10.1037/hea0001495. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
4
Effectiveness of Couple Interventions in Marital Distress: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.夫妻干预对婚姻困扰的有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Iran J Public Health. 2025 Jan;54(1):112-123. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v54i1.17581.
5
Comparing the OurRelationship Program and Bibliotherapy for Parents Experiencing Couple Distress: A Randomized Pilot.比较针对经历夫妻关系困扰的父母的“我们的关系”项目与阅读疗法:一项随机试点研究。
J Marital Fam Ther. 2025 Jan;51(1):e12762. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12762.
6
Prevalence and predictors of help-seeking steps in a nationally representative Dutch sample of romantic couples.在具有全国代表性的荷兰浪漫伴侣样本中,寻求帮助步骤的患病率及预测因素。
Fam Process. 2025 Mar;64(1):e13074. doi: 10.1111/famp.13074. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
7
A novel framework for ketamine-assisted couple therapy.一种用于氯胺酮辅助夫妻治疗的新型框架。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Aug 13;15:1376646. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1376646. eCollection 2024.
8
A randomized controlled trial of the online OurRelationship program with varying levels of coach support.一项针对不同教练支持水平的在线“我们的关系”项目的随机对照试验。
Internet Interv. 2023 Aug 28;34:100661. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2023.100661. eCollection 2023 Dec.
9
Randomized controlled trial of the Marriage Checkup: Stress outcomes.《婚姻检查》随机对照试验:压力结果。
J Marital Fam Ther. 2023 Jan;49(1):242-259. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12620. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
10
Relationship Health and Intimate Partner Violence in Integrated Primary Care: Individual Characteristics and Preferences for Relationship Support across Risk Levels.综合初级保健中的关系健康和亲密伴侣暴力:不同风险水平的个体特征和关系支持偏好。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 27;19(21):13984. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113984.