Department of Psychology.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2020 Jul;88(7):583-596. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000514.
This study updated existing meta-analyses of couple therapy that typically do not include multiple treatment modalities, various research designs, long-term outcomes, or recent studies. Eligibility Criteria: Studies published in English that reported relationship satisfaction or other outcomes of couple therapy were included; over 70% of studies have not been included in previous meta-analyses. Methods of Synthesis: Using random effects models across 58 studies representing 40 unique samples and 2,092 couples, effect sizes were summarized within measure domains as mean gains for treatment groups and waitlist groups as well as between-groups comparisons.
Couple therapy has a large effect on relationship satisfaction (pre to post within-group Hedges ḡ = 1.12, CI [0.92, 1.31], p < .001) and couples assigned to waitlists do not significantly improve (pre-to-post within-group satisfaction Hedges ḡ = 0.12, CI [-0.04, 0.29], p > .05). Additionally, couple therapy has significant impacts on key domains including self-reported and observed communication, emotional intimacy, and partner behaviors. Moderation analyses of pre-to-post gains in relationship satisfaction for treatment groups were generally nonsignificant; however, greater baseline distress was associated with larger gains.
Couple therapy has large effects on key relationship domains and gains are generally maintained over short- and long-term follow-up with minimal impact of tested moderators. Limitations include sample of exclusively opposite sex couples and inability to fully model dependencies within studies. The relationship between mean gain effect sizes and between-groups comparisons is discussed with implications for future research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
本研究更新了现有的夫妻治疗元分析,这些元分析通常不包括多种治疗方式、各种研究设计、长期结果或近期研究。
纳入发表于英文期刊、报告夫妻治疗的关系满意度或其他结果的研究;超过 70%的研究未包含在前述元分析中。
对 58 项研究进行随机效应模型分析,这些研究代表了 40 个独特的样本和 2092 对夫妇,在测量领域内总结了治疗组和候补组的效应大小,即治疗组和候补组的平均增益以及组间比较。
夫妻治疗对关系满意度有显著影响(组内前后比较 Hedges ḡ=1.12,CI[0.92,1.31],p<0.001),而被分配到候补组的夫妇并没有显著改善(组内前后比较满意度 Hedges ḡ=0.12,CI[-0.04,0.29],p>0.05)。此外,夫妻治疗对关键领域如自我报告和观察到的沟通、情感亲密和伴侣行为也有显著影响。治疗组的关系满意度的治疗前后增益的调节分析通常不显著;然而,基线时的较高困扰与较大的增益相关。
夫妻治疗对关键的关系领域有显著影响,且增益在短期和长期随访中基本保持,受测试的调节因素影响较小。局限性包括研究中仅纳入异性夫妻样本以及无法完全建立研究内的依存关系。讨论了平均增益效应大小与组间比较之间的关系,并对未来研究提出了启示。