Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, United States.
Bilkent University, Turkey.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Oct;105:220-230. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.08.006. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
Aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of different batterer intervention programs in reducing violence for male IPV perpetrators. The Cochrane Handbook for Systemic Reviews of Interventions guidelines for the process of conducting systematic reviews and meta-analysis were followed. Pooled together, overall these various intervention programs are effective in reducing violence for male perpetrators of IPV comparing post to pre-intervention [(pooled estimate = -0.85; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) (-1.02 to -0.69)]. Exploratory subgroup analysis revealed that incorporating substance abuse or trauma components to the interventions yielded better results (substance abuse: CI = -3.20 to -1.08 and trauma: CI = -2.63 to -0.30) as compared to programs that did not have these components. Gender-role based batterer intervention programs yielded mixed results. Analysis of the three controlled studies with 223 participants comparing batterer programs to a minimal control group showed mixed effects. In conclusion, treatment strategies that are addressing highly comorbid issues such as substance abuse and trauma issues may work more effectively in preventing violence.
本研究旨在调查不同的施暴者干预项目在减少男性针对亲密伴侣暴力行为方面的效果。本研究遵循了 Cochrane 干预系统评价手册的系统评价和荟萃分析流程指南。总体而言,这些不同的干预项目在减少男性亲密伴侣暴力行为方面是有效的,与干预前相比,干预后暴力行为减少了 [(合并估计值 = -0.85;95%置信区间 (CI) (-1.02 至 -0.69)]。探索性亚组分析表明,将药物滥用或创伤因素纳入干预措施会产生更好的效果(药物滥用:CI = -3.20 至 -1.08;创伤:CI = -2.63 至 -0.30),而不包含这些因素的干预措施效果则较差。基于性别角色的施暴者干预项目的效果则较为复杂。对 3 项包含 223 名参与者的对照研究进行分析发现,将施暴者干预项目与最小对照组进行比较,结果存在差异。总之,针对药物滥用和创伤等高度共病问题的治疗策略可能更有效地预防暴力行为。