• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定性研究探讨医患之间关于在线健康信息的交流。

Qualitative Research Studies Addressing Patient-Practitioner Communication about Online Health Information.

机构信息

Department of Language and Literature, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.

Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 27;19(21):14004. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114004.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph192114004
PMID:36360881
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9659101/
Abstract

Modern healthcare is becoming increasingly technologized, knowledge-intensive, and specialized, which has consequences for communication between patients and practitioners in clinical encounters. Health information is increasingly accessible to patients through online resources. The objective of this paper is to provide an overview of existing studies that address how patients communicate with practitioners about online health information and to identify the key topics raised in these studies. With the concept of eHealth literacy as its point of departure, this paper specifically highlights the eHealth literacy topic of how patients , and online health information before and during the encounter with the healthcare professionals. In the literature search, we focus on qualitative studies that consider patients' and/or practitioners' reflections on online health information. We searched PUBMED, SCOPUS and Web of Science to capture research from various fields. Sixteen studies were included that met the following criteria: Qualitative study, focus on patient-practitioner communication, eHealth literacy and online information. The results show that the vast majority of studies were based on qualitative interviews, addressing patients' and practitioners' perspectives. Key topics in studies addressing patient perspectives were: ; of online information with the practitioner; and with practitioners. Key topics raised in studies focusing on practitioners were: in the patient and the online health information he/she presented as well as who referred to online health information. The review highlights the need for further qualitative studies, preferably observational studies from authentic clinical communication situations, in order to capture how patients and practitioners communicate about online health information.

摘要

现代医疗越来越依赖技术,知识密集度越来越高,专业性也越来越强,这对医患在临床互动中的交流产生了影响。患者可以通过在线资源获取越来越多的健康信息。本文的目的是概述现有的研究,这些研究探讨了患者如何与医生就在线健康信息进行沟通,并确定这些研究中提出的关键主题。本文以电子健康素养为出发点,特别强调了患者在与医疗专业人员互动之前和期间如何使用电子健康素养来处理在线健康信息。在文献检索中,我们专注于考虑患者和/或医生对在线健康信息的反思的定性研究。我们在 PUBMED、SCOPUS 和 Web of Science 中进行了搜索,以捕捉来自各个领域的研究。符合以下标准的 16 项研究被纳入:定性研究、关注医患沟通、电子健康素养和在线信息。研究结果表明,绝大多数研究基于定性访谈,涉及患者和医生的观点。涉及患者观点的研究中的关键主题是:在线信息的 ;与医生分享在线信息的 ;以及 ;在遇到医生时分享在线信息的意愿。关注医生观点的研究中提出的关键主题是: ;对患者和他们提供的在线健康信息的理解 ;以及 ;对患者在线健康信息来源的理解。该综述强调需要进一步开展定性研究,最好是来自真实临床交流情境的观察性研究,以捕捉患者和医生如何就在线健康信息进行沟通。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/393e/9659101/bc09c91b9c09/ijerph-19-14004-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/393e/9659101/bc09c91b9c09/ijerph-19-14004-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/393e/9659101/bc09c91b9c09/ijerph-19-14004-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Qualitative Research Studies Addressing Patient-Practitioner Communication about Online Health Information.定性研究探讨医患之间关于在线健康信息的交流。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 27;19(21):14004. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114004.
2
Online Health Information Seeking and eHealth Literacy Among Patients Attending a Primary Care Clinic in Hong Kong: A Cross-Sectional Survey.香港基层医疗诊所患者的在线健康信息搜索与电子健康素养:一项横断面调查
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 27;21(3):e10831. doi: 10.2196/10831.
3
The Influence of eHealth Literacy on Perceived Trust in Online Health Communication Channels and Sources.电子健康素养对在线健康交流渠道和信息源的感知信任的影响。
J Health Commun. 2017 Jan;22(1):53-65. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1250846. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
4
Trust and distrust toward online health information in nurse-patient communication and implications for eHealth literacy.医患沟通中对在线健康信息的信任和不信任及其对电子健康素养的影响。
J Commun Healthc. 2023 Dec;16(4):412-420. doi: 10.1080/17538068.2023.2279397. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
5
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
6
Patient perspectives on online health information and communication with doctors: a qualitative study of patients 50 years old and over.50岁及以上患者对在线健康信息及与医生沟通的看法:一项定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jan 13;17(1):e19. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3588.
7
Association Between eHealth Literacy in Online Health Communities and Patient Adherence: Cross-sectional Questionnaire Study.在线健康社区中的电子健康素养与患者遵医行为之间的关联:横断面问卷调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 13;23(9):e14908. doi: 10.2196/14908.
8
Effects of eHealth Literacy on General Practitioner Consultations: A Mediation Analysis.电子健康素养对全科医生诊疗的影响:一项中介分析
J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 16;19(5):e166. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6317.
9
Health professionals' views on health literacy issues for culturally and linguistically diverse women in maternity care: barriers, enablers and the need for an integrated approach.医疗保健专业人员对孕产护理中文化和语言背景多样的女性的健康素养问题的看法:障碍、促进因素以及采取综合方法的必要性。
Aust Health Rev. 2018 Feb;42(1):10-20. doi: 10.1071/AH17067.
10
Online health information-seeking behaviour of patients attending a primary care clinic in Malaysia: a cross-sectional study.马来西亚一家初级保健诊所患者的在线健康信息搜索行为:一项横断面研究。
Fam Pract. 2022 Jan 19;39(1):38-45. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmab099.

引用本文的文献

1
[Professional health literacy. Professional and gender-specific aspects].[专业健康素养。专业及性别特定方面]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025 Mar;68(3):282-292. doi: 10.1007/s00103-025-04014-8. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
2
The development of an online-based rural community of practice framework for addressing health issues among rural citizens: a grounded theory approach.基于网络的农村实践共同体框架的发展,以解决农村居民的健康问题:扎根理论方法。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 14;24(1):3166. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20690-8.
3
An Introduction to Health Literacy and Social Contexts with Recommendations for Health Professionals and Researchers.

本文引用的文献

1
Patients' and healthcare providers' perceptions and experiences of telehealth use and online health information use in chronic disease management for older patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a qualitative study.患者和医疗保健提供者对老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者慢性病管理中远程医疗和在线健康信息使用的看法和体验:一项定性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jan 3;22(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02702-z.
2
Patients' challenges, competencies, and perceived support in dealing with information needs - A qualitative analysis in patients with breast and gynecological cancer.患者在应对信息需求方面的挑战、能力和感知支持 - 乳腺癌和妇科癌症患者的定性分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jul;105(7):2382-2390. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.12.006. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
3
健康素养与社会背景概论及对健康专业人士和研究人员的建议
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Feb 19;21(2):240. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21020240.
4
How socioeconomically disadvantaged people access, understand, appraise, and apply health information: A qualitative study exploring health literacy skills.社会经济地位处于劣势的人如何获取、理解、评估和应用健康信息:一项探索健康素养技能的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 9;18(8):e0288381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288381. eCollection 2023.
Primary Health Care Nurses' Experiences of Consultations With Internet-Informed Patients: Qualitative Study.基层医疗护士与参考网络信息的患者会诊的体验:定性研究
JMIR Nurs. 2019 Jul 30;2(1):e14194. doi: 10.2196/14194. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
4
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.《PRISMA 2020声明:报告系统评价的更新指南》
Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 29;10(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4.
5
Exploring Women's Experiences in Accessing, Understanding, Appraising, and Applying Health Information During Pregnancy.探讨女性在怀孕期间获取、理解、评估和应用健康信息的体验。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2019 Jul;64(4):472-480. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12965. Epub 2019 May 3.
6
Where else would I look for it? A five-country qualitative study on purposes, strategies, and consequences of online health information seeking.我还能在哪里找到它呢?一项关于在线健康信息搜索的目的、策略和后果的五国定性研究。
J Public Health Res. 2019 Apr 15;8(1):1518. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2019.1518. eCollection 2019 Mar 11.
7
Online Health Searches and Their Perceived Effects on Patients and Patient-Clinician Relationships: ASystematic Review.在线健康搜索及其对患者和医患关系的感知影响:系统评价。
Am J Med. 2018 Oct;131(10):1250.e1-1250.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.04.019. Epub 2018 May 3.
8
Online Health-Information Seeking Among Older Populations: Family Influences and the Role of the Medical Professional.老年人在线健康信息搜索:家庭影响和医疗专业人员的作用。
Health Commun. 2019 Jul;34(8):859-871. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2018.1439265. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
9
How do health professionals acknowledge Web-based knowledge in pregnancy consultations?医疗专业人员在孕期咨询中如何认可基于网络的知识?
Health Care Women Int. 2018 Sep;39(9):955-967. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2017.1423314. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
10
eHealth literacy research-Quo vadis?电子健康素养研究——何去何从?
Inform Health Soc Care. 2018 Dec;43(4):427-442. doi: 10.1080/17538157.2017.1364247. Epub 2017 Oct 18.