• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗专业人员在孕期咨询中如何认可基于网络的知识?

How do health professionals acknowledge Web-based knowledge in pregnancy consultations?

作者信息

Fredriksen Eva Haukeland, Moland Karen Marie, Harris Janet

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, Physiotherapy and Radiography, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.

Centre for International Health, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

Health Care Women Int. 2018 Sep;39(9):955-967. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2017.1423314. Epub 2018 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1080/07399332.2017.1423314
PMID:29313795
Abstract

Websites for pregnancy health are an important source of information for pregnant women, but how different cadres of health professionals value and utilize pregnant women's e-health literacy (e-HL) and Web-based knowledge in pregnancy consultations is not well understood. Using a qualitative research design and pelvic girdle pain as a tracer condition, we explored how Norwegian doctors, midwives and physiotherapists manage women's e-HL and Web-based knowledge in pregnancy consultations. The recognition of pregnant women's e-HL and Web-based knowledge differed across professional groups and produced dismissive, reactive and proactive attitudes depending on time pressure, professional identity and Internet experience.

摘要

孕期健康相关网站是孕妇重要的信息来源,但不同医疗专业人员如何看待和利用孕妇的电子健康素养(e-HL)以及孕期咨询中的网络知识,目前还不太清楚。我们采用定性研究设计,并以骨盆带疼痛作为追踪病症,探讨了挪威医生、助产士和物理治疗师在孕期咨询中如何处理孕妇的电子健康素养和网络知识。不同专业群体对孕妇电子健康素养和网络知识的认知存在差异,并且根据时间压力、职业身份和网络使用经验产生了轻视、被动和主动的态度。

相似文献

1
How do health professionals acknowledge Web-based knowledge in pregnancy consultations?医疗专业人员在孕期咨询中如何认可基于网络的知识?
Health Care Women Int. 2018 Sep;39(9):955-967. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2017.1423314. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
2
Web-based Discussion Forums on Pregnancy Complaints and Maternal Health Literacy in Norway: A Qualitative Study.挪威基于网络的妊娠相关问题讨论论坛与孕产妇健康素养:一项定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2016 May 26;18(5):e113. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5270.
3
"Listen to your body". A qualitative text analysis of internet discussions related to pregnancy health and pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy.“倾听你的身体”。关于孕期健康及孕期骨盆带疼痛的网络讨论的质性文本分析
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Nov;73(2):294-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.02.002.
4
How women with high risk pregnancies perceive interactions with healthcare professionals when discussing place of birth: A qualitative study.高危妊娠女性在讨论分娩地点时如何看待与医护人员的互动:一项定性研究。
Midwifery. 2016 Jul;38:42-8. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.03.009. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
5
Women's experiences of pregnancy related pelvic girdle pain: A systematic review.女性妊娠相关骨盆带疼痛的经历:一项系统综述。
Midwifery. 2018 Jan;56:102-111. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.10.011. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
6
Consent in pregnancy: A qualitative study of the views and experiences of women and their healthcare professionals.妊娠同意:对女性及其医疗保健专业人员的观点和经验的定性研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Jul;238:132-137. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.05.008. Epub 2019 May 11.
7
Life's pregnant pause of pain: pregnant women's experiences of pelvic girdle pain related to daily life: a Swedish interview study.充满痛苦的人生暂停:与日常生活相关的孕妇骨盆带疼痛的体验:一项瑞典访谈研究。
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2013 Mar;4(1):29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2012.11.003. Epub 2012 Nov 23.
8
A qualitative exploration of the views and experiences of women with Pregnancy related Pelvic Girdle Pain.对妊娠相关骨盆带疼痛的女性的观点和体验进行定性探索。
Physiotherapy. 2018 Sep;104(3):338-346. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2018.05.001. Epub 2018 May 22.
9
Women's experience of low back and/or pelvic pain (LBPP) during pregnancy.女性孕期下背部和/或骨盆疼痛(LBPP)的经历。
Midwifery. 2016 Jun;37:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.03.013. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
10
Views of Women and Health Professionals on mHealth Lifestyle Interventions in Pregnancy: A Qualitative Investigation.女性和健康专业人士对孕期移动医疗生活方式干预的看法:一项定性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Oct 28;3(4):e99. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4869.

引用本文的文献

1
Navigating Pregnancy: Information Sources and Lifestyle Behavior Choices-A Narrative Review.孕期导航:信息来源与生活方式行为选择——叙述性综述。
J Pregnancy. 2024 Sep 21;2024:4040825. doi: 10.1155/2024/4040825. eCollection 2024.
2
Physician Perspectives on Internet-Informed Patients: Systematic Review.医生视角下的互联网知情患者:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jun 6;26:e47620. doi: 10.2196/47620.
3
How Physicians Tackle Internet-Misinformed Patients: Going Beyond Traditional Patient-Centered Communication - A Study Protocol.
医生如何应对受互联网误导的患者:超越传统的以患者为中心的沟通——一项研究方案
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2023 Sep 6;14:983-988. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S425434. eCollection 2023.
4
The gluten-free diet challenge in adults with coeliac disease: the Hellenic survey.成年乳糜泻患者的无麸质饮食挑战:希腊调查
PEC Innov. 2022 Mar 31;1:100037. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100037. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
Qualitative Research Studies Addressing Patient-Practitioner Communication about Online Health Information.定性研究探讨医患之间关于在线健康信息的交流。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 27;19(21):14004. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114004.
6
Midwives' views towards women using mHealth and eHealth to self-monitor their pregnancy: A systematic review of the literature.助产士对女性使用移动健康和电子健康技术自我监测孕期的看法:文献系统综述
Eur J Midwifery. 2020 Sep 17;4:36. doi: 10.18332/ejm/126625. eCollection 2020.