• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Where else would I look for it? A five-country qualitative study on purposes, strategies, and consequences of online health information seeking.我还能在哪里找到它呢?一项关于在线健康信息搜索的目的、策略和后果的五国定性研究。
J Public Health Res. 2019 Apr 15;8(1):1518. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2019.1518. eCollection 2019 Mar 11.
2
Online Health Information Seeking and eHealth Literacy Among Spanish Language-Dominant Latino Adults Receiving Care in a Community Clinic: Secondary Analysis of Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Data.在社区诊所接受治疗的以西班牙语为主的拉丁裔成年人的在线健康信息搜索与电子健康素养:试点随机对照试验数据的二次分析
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Oct 13;6(10):e37687. doi: 10.2196/37687.
3
Health information seeking in the digital age: a national survey of women with disabilities.数字时代的健康信息寻求:一项全国残疾女性调查。
Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Aug;45(17):2751-2760. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2105960. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
4
Online health information-seeking behaviors and skills of Chinese college students.中国大学生的在线健康信息搜索行为和技能。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 15;21(1):736. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10801-0.
5
Experiences and influences of online health information-seeking about statin use in patients with high cardiovascular risk: a qualitative study.高心血管风险患者使用他汀类药物的在线健康信息搜索:一项定性研究的经验和影响。
Fam Pract. 2023 Dec 22;40(5-6):796-804. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmad034.
6
Characterizing the Adoption and Experiences of Users of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Health Information in the United States: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.描述美国人工智能生成健康信息用户的采用和体验:横断面问卷调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 14;26:e55138. doi: 10.2196/55138.
7
The Effect of Online Health Information Seeking on Physician-Patient Relationships: Systematic Review.在线健康信息搜索对医患关系的影响:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 10;24(2):e23354. doi: 10.2196/23354.
8
Contexts and Outcomes of Proxy Online Health Information Seeking: Mixed Studies Review With Framework Synthesis.代理在线健康信息搜索的背景和结果:混合研究综述与框架综合。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jun 24;24(6):e34345. doi: 10.2196/34345.
9
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
10
Exploring the role of online health information and social media in the illness experience of arthritis-related fatigue: A focus group study.探索在线健康信息和社交媒体在关节炎相关性疲劳疾病体验中的作用:一项焦点小组研究。
Musculoskeletal Care. 2020 Dec;18(4):501-509. doi: 10.1002/msc.1494. Epub 2020 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient perspectives on multidimensional learning and person-centred care: interviews with persons living with type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病患者对多维学习和以患者为中心的护理的看法:对2型糖尿病患者的访谈
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2025 Mar;43(1):230-240. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2024.2423881. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
2
Assessing Credibility: Quality Criteria for Patients, Caregivers, and the Public in Online Health Information-A Qualitative Study.评估可信度:在线健康信息中患者、护理人员及公众的质量标准——一项定性研究
J Patient Exp. 2024 May 31;11:23743735241259440. doi: 10.1177/23743735241259440. eCollection 2024.
3
Supporting Collaboration in Rehabilitation Trajectories With Information and Communication Technologies: Scoping Review.利用信息通信技术支持康复轨迹中的协作:范围综述
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 Jul 11;10:e46408. doi: 10.2196/46408.
4
Early Follow-up of Parents by a Specialized Cleft Nurse After the Birth of an Infant with Cleft lip and/or Palate.唇腭裂婴儿出生后,由专科腭裂护士对其父母进行早期随访。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024 Aug;61(8):1369-1382. doi: 10.1177/10556656231171750. Epub 2023 May 7.
5
Digital Transformation in Healthcare: Technology Acceptance and Its Applications.医疗保健领域的数字化转型:技术接受及其应用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 15;20(4):3407. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043407.
6
Qualitative Research Studies Addressing Patient-Practitioner Communication about Online Health Information.定性研究探讨医患之间关于在线健康信息的交流。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 27;19(21):14004. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114004.
7
Do health literacy levels of nursing students change throughout the study programme? A cross-sectional study.护理专业学生的健康素养水平在整个学习过程中是否会发生变化?一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 12;12(1):e047712. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047712.
8
Patients' and healthcare providers' perceptions and experiences of telehealth use and online health information use in chronic disease management for older patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a qualitative study.患者和医疗保健提供者对老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者慢性病管理中远程医疗和在线健康信息使用的看法和体验:一项定性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jan 3;22(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02702-z.
9
Understanding digital health ecosystem from Australian citizens' perspective: A scoping review.从澳大利亚公民的视角理解数字健康生态系统:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 15;16(11):e0260058. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260058. eCollection 2021.
10
Qualitative study: patients' enduring concerns about discussing internet use in general practice consultations.定性研究:患者在全科医疗咨询中对讨论互联网使用的持续担忧。
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 28;11(4):e047508. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047508.

本文引用的文献

1
Dutch health websites and their ability to inform people with low health literacy.荷兰健康网站及其对低健康素养人群的信息传达能力。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Nov;100(11):2012-2019. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Jun 10.
2
Health literacy in the eHealth era: A systematic review of the literature.电子健康时代的健康素养:文献系统综述
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Jun;100(6):1073-1082. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.01.015. Epub 2017 Jan 28.
3
Exploring the role of health literacy in the evaluation of online health information: Insights from a mixed-methods study.探索健康素养在在线健康信息评估中的作用:一项混合方法研究的见解。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Jun;99(6):1017-25. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
4
Comparing the quality of pro- and anti-vaccination online information: a content analysis of vaccination-related webpages.比较支持和反对疫苗接种的在线信息质量:疫苗接种相关网页的内容分析
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jan 15;16:38. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2722-9.
5
Low health literacy and evaluation of online health information: a systematic review of the literature.低健康素养与在线健康信息评估:文献系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 7;17(5):e112. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4018.
6
eHealth literacy and Web 2.0 health information seeking behaviors among baby boomers and older adults.婴儿潮一代和老年人的电子健康素养与Web 2.0健康信息搜索行为
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Mar 17;17(3):e70. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3992.
7
Association of eHealth literacy with colorectal cancer knowledge and screening practice among internet users in Japan.日本互联网用户的电子健康素养与结直肠癌知识及筛查实践的关联
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Nov 13;14(6):e153. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1927.
8
The characteristics and motivations of online health information seekers: cross-sectional survey and qualitative interview study.在线健康信息搜索者的特征与动机:横断面调查与定性访谈研究
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Feb 23;13(1):e20. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1600.
9
Correlates of consumer trust in online health information: findings from the health information national trends survey.消费者对在线健康信息信任的相关因素:来自健康信息国家趋势调查的结果。
J Health Commun. 2011 Jan;16(1):34-49. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.529491.
10
Commonly cited website quality criteria are not effective at identifying inaccurate online information about breast cancer.常见的网站质量标准在识别有关乳腺癌的不准确在线信息方面并无成效。
Cancer. 2008 Mar 15;112(6):1206-13. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23308.

我还能在哪里找到它呢?一项关于在线健康信息搜索的目的、策略和后果的五国定性研究。

Where else would I look for it? A five-country qualitative study on purposes, strategies, and consequences of online health information seeking.

作者信息

Diviani Nicola, Fredriksen Eva Haukeland, Meppelink Corine S, Mullan Judy, Rich Warren, Sudmann Tobba Therkildsen

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences and Health Policy, University of Lucerne, Switzerland.

Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Public Health Res. 2019 Apr 15;8(1):1518. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2019.1518. eCollection 2019 Mar 11.

DOI:10.4081/jphr.2019.1518
PMID:31044138
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6478008/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Online health information (OHI) is widely available and consulted by many people in Western countries to gain health advice. The main goal of the present study is to provide a detailed account of the experiences among people from various demographic backgrounds living in high-income countries, who have used OHI.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Thematic analysis of 165 qualitative semi-structured interviews conducted among OHI users residing in Australia, Israel, the Netherlands, Norway, and Switzerland was performed.

RESULTS

The lived experience of people using OHI seem not to differ across countries. The interviews show that searches for OHI are motivated from curiosity, sharing of experiences, or affirmation for actions already taken. Most people find it difficult to appraise the information, leading them to cross-check sources or discuss OHI with others. OHI seems to impact mostly some specific types of health behaviors, such as changes in diet or physical activity, while it only plays a complementary role for more serious health concerns. Participants often check OHI before seeing their GP, but are reluctant to discuss online content with health care personnel due to expected negative reception.

CONCLUSIONS

This study adds to the body of knowledge on eHealth literacy by demonstrating how OHI affects overall health behavior, strengthens patients' ability to understand, live with, and prepare themselves for diverse health challenges. The increasing digitalization of health communication and health care calls for further research on digital divides and patient-professional relations. Health care professionals should acknowledge OHI seeking and engage in discussions with patients to enable them to appreciate OHI, and to support shared decision making in health care. The professionals can utilize patient's desire to learn as a resource for health prevention, promotion or treatment, and empowerment.

摘要

背景

在线健康信息(OHI)在西方国家广泛可得,许多人通过它获取健康建议。本研究的主要目的是详细描述生活在高收入国家、使用过OHI的不同人口背景人群的经历。

设计与方法

对居住在澳大利亚、以色列、荷兰、挪威和瑞士的OHI用户进行了165次定性半结构化访谈,并进行了主题分析。

结果

使用OHI的人群的生活经历在不同国家似乎并无差异。访谈表明,搜索OHI的动机源于好奇心、经验分享或对已采取行动的确认。大多数人发现难以评估这些信息,这导致他们交叉核对信息来源或与他人讨论OHI。OHI似乎主要影响某些特定类型的健康行为,如饮食或体育活动的改变,而对于更严重的健康问题,它只起辅助作用。参与者在看全科医生之前经常会查看OHI,但由于预期会得到负面反馈,他们不愿与医护人员讨论在线内容。

结论

本研究通过展示OHI如何影响整体健康行为,增加了关于电子健康素养的知识体系,增强了患者理解、应对各种健康挑战并为其做好准备的能力。健康沟通和医疗保健日益数字化,这需要对数字鸿沟和医患关系进行进一步研究。医护人员应认识到患者对OHI的搜索行为,并与患者进行讨论,以使他们能够正确看待OHI,并支持医疗保健中的共同决策。专业人员可以利用患者的求知欲作为健康预防、促进或治疗以及赋权的资源。