• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

封锁措施对新冠治疗中心医院工作人员的影响:一项回顾性观察研究。

Effect of Lockdowns on Hospital Staff in a COVID Center: A Retrospective Observational Study.

作者信息

Vetrugno Giuseppe, Sanguinetti Maurizio, Murri Rita, Sali Michela, Marchetti Simona, Santangelo Rosaria, Fantoni Massimo, Cingolani Antonella, Scoppettuolo Giancarlo, Di Donato Michele, Grassi Vincenzo M, Foti Federica, Marchese Luca, De-Giorgio Fabio, Oliva Antonio, Staiti Domenico, De Simone Francesco Maria, Pascucci Domenico, Cascini Fidelia, Pastorino Roberta, Pires-Marafon Denise, Cambieri Andrea, Laurenti Patrizia, Boccia Stefania, Ricciardi Walter, Franceschi Francesco

机构信息

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.

Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Oct 31;10(11):1847. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10111847.

DOI:10.3390/vaccines10111847
PMID:36366356
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9698425/
Abstract

At the onset of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, individual and social measures were strengthened through restrictive non-pharmaceutical interventions, labelled with the term “lockdown”. In Italy, there were two lockdowns (9 March 2020−3 May 2020 and 3 November 2020−27 March 2021). As part of preventive measures, healthcare workers and the administrative staff population of Policlinico A. Gemelli underwent nasopharyngeal swab tests from 1 March 2020 to 9 February 2022, a long time interval that includes the two aforementioned lockdowns. The population included 8958 people from 1 March 2020 to 31 December 2020; 8981 people from 1 January 2021 to 31 December 2021; and 8981 people from 1 January 2022 to 9 February 2022. We then analysed pseudo-anonymized data, using a retrospective observational approach to evaluate the impact of the lockdown on the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infections within the population. Given the 14 day contagious period, the swab positivity rate (SPR) among the staff decreased significantly at the end of the first lockdown, every day prior to 18 May 2020, by 0.093 (p < 0.0001, CI = (−0.138−−0.047)). After the fourteenth day post the end of the first lockdown (18 May 2020), the SPR increased daily at a rate of 0.024 (p < 0.0001, 95% CI = (0.013−0.034)). In addition, the SPR appeared to increase significantly every day prior to 17 November 2020 by 0.024 (p < 0.0001, CI = (0.013−0.034)). After the fourteenth day post the start of the second lockdown (17 November 2020), the SPR decreased daily at a rate of 0.039 (p < 0.0001, 95% CI = (−0.050−−0.027)). These data demonstrate that, in our Institution, the lockdowns helped to both protect healthcare workers and maintain adequate standards of care for COVID and non-COVID patients for the duration of the state of emergency in Italy.

摘要

在严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)大流行初期,通过限制性非药物干预措施加强了个人和社会措施,这些措施被称为“封锁”。在意大利,实施了两次封锁(2020年3月9日至2020年5月3日以及2020年11月3日至2021年3月27日)。作为预防措施的一部分,从2020年3月1日至2022年2月9日,A. 杰梅利综合医院的医护人员和行政人员接受了鼻咽拭子检测,这是一个较长的时间段,包括上述两次封锁。该人群在2020年3月1日至2020年12月31日有8958人;在2021年1月1日至2021年12月31日有8981人;在2022年1月1日至2022年2月9日有8981人。然后我们分析了经过伪匿名处理的数据,采用回顾性观察方法来评估封锁对该人群中SARS-CoV-2感染发生率的影响。考虑到14天的传染期,在第一次封锁结束时,即2020年5月18日之前的每一天,工作人员中的拭子阳性率(SPR)显著下降,下降幅度为0.093(p<0.0001,置信区间=(-0.138--0.047))。在第一次封锁结束后的第14天(2020年5月18日)之后,SPR每天以0.024的速率上升(p<0.0001,95%置信区间=(0.013-0.034))。此外,在2020年11月17日之前的每一天,SPR似乎显著上升,上升幅度为0.024(p<0.0001,置信区间=(0.013-0.034))。在第二次封锁开始后的第14天(2020年11月17日)之后,SPR每天以0.039的速率下降(p<0.0001,95%置信区间=(-0.050--0.027))。这些数据表明,在我们的机构中,封锁有助于保护医护人员,并在意大利紧急状态期间为新冠患者和非新冠患者维持适当的护理标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04fa/9698425/ec03ae95837b/vaccines-10-01847-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04fa/9698425/fafaf4aea5f2/vaccines-10-01847-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04fa/9698425/dfcd48d266bf/vaccines-10-01847-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04fa/9698425/ec03ae95837b/vaccines-10-01847-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04fa/9698425/fafaf4aea5f2/vaccines-10-01847-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04fa/9698425/dfcd48d266bf/vaccines-10-01847-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04fa/9698425/ec03ae95837b/vaccines-10-01847-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of Lockdowns on Hospital Staff in a COVID Center: A Retrospective Observational Study.封锁措施对新冠治疗中心医院工作人员的影响:一项回顾性观察研究。
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Oct 31;10(11):1847. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10111847.
2
Perceptions of Covid-19 lockdowns and related public health measures in Austria: a longitudinal online survey.奥地利人对新冠封锁措施和相关公共卫生措施的看法:一项纵向在线调查。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Aug 4;21(1):1502. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11476-3.
3
Burden of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers during second wave in England and impact of vaccines: prospective multicentre cohort study (SIREN) and mathematical model.英格兰第二波疫情期间医护人员感染 SARS-CoV-2 的负担和疫苗的影响:前瞻性多中心队列研究(SIREN)和数学模型。
BMJ. 2022 Jul 20;378:e070379. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070379.
4
COVID-related "lockdowns" and birth rates in New York.纽约的新冠疫情相关“封锁”与出生率。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Nov;3(6):100476. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100476. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
5
Impact of COVID-19 Lockdown, during the Two Waves, on Drug Use and Emergency Department Access in People with Epilepsy: An Interrupted Time-Series Analysis.新冠疫情两波封锁对癫痫患者药物使用和急诊就诊的影响:一项中断时间序列分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 16;18(24):13253. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413253.
6
A Qualitative Study of Autistic Adults' Quality of Life During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Lockdowns.一项关于新冠疫情及封锁期间成年自闭症患者生活质量的定性研究。
Autism Adulthood. 2023 Sep 1;5(3):311-324. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0035. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
7
How COVID-19 Lockdown in Italy Has Affected Type of Calls and Management of Toxic Exposures: a Retrospective Analysis of a Poison Control Center Database From March 2020 to May 2020.意大利新冠疫情封锁措施如何影响中毒暴露的呼叫类型及管理:对2020年3月至2020年5月中毒控制中心数据库的回顾性分析
J Med Toxicol. 2021 Jul;17(3):250-256. doi: 10.1007/s13181-021-00839-2. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
8
Antidepressants Drug Use during COVID-19 Waves in the Tuscan General Population: An Interrupted Time-Series Analysis.托斯卡纳普通人群在新冠疫情各波期间的抗抑郁药物使用情况:一项中断时间序列分析
J Pers Med. 2022 Jan 28;12(2):178. doi: 10.3390/jpm12020178.
9
Comparisons of home-based arts engagement across three national lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic in England.比较英格兰在 COVID-19 大流行期间三次全国封锁期间的家庭艺术参与度。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 31;17(8):e0273829. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273829. eCollection 2022.
10
Modelling the impact of reopening schools in the UK in early 2021 in the presence of the alpha variant and with roll-out of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2.模拟在2021年初英国重新开学、出现阿尔法变异毒株以及开展针对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)疫苗接种的情况下所产生的影响。
J Math Anal Appl. 2022 Oct 15;514(2):126050. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2022.126050. Epub 2022 Feb 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in handwashing behaviours for COVID-19 prevention: Longitudinal evidence from online surveys in 10 sub-Saharan African countries.预防新冠病毒的洗手行为趋势:来自撒哈拉以南非洲10个国家在线调查的纵向证据
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2021 Nov 12;1(11):e0000049. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000049. eCollection 2021.
2
Burden of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers during second wave in England and impact of vaccines: prospective multicentre cohort study (SIREN) and mathematical model.英格兰第二波疫情期间医护人员感染 SARS-CoV-2 的负担和疫苗的影响:前瞻性多中心队列研究(SIREN)和数学模型。
BMJ. 2022 Jul 20;378:e070379. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070379.
3
Correction: Evaluation of science advice during the COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden.
更正:瑞典新冠疫情期间科学建议的评估
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2022;9(1):239. doi: 10.1057/s41599-022-01254-w. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
4
The relative effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on wave one Covid-19 mortality: natural experiment in 130 countries.非药物干预措施对第一波新冠死亡率的相对影响:130 个国家的自然实验。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 3;22(1):1113. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13546-6.
5
Rapid Diagnostic Testing for SARS-CoV-2. Reply.
N Engl J Med. 2022 Apr 28;386(17):e47. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2202308. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
6
The end of the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠大流行的终结。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2022 Jun;52(6):e13782. doi: 10.1111/eci.13782. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
7
With covid-19, single measures aren't enough.
BMJ. 2021 Dec 29;375:n3157. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n3157.
8
Use of contact tracing, isolation, and mass testing to control transmission of covid-19 in China.利用接触者追踪、隔离和大规模检测来控制中国新冠病毒的传播。
BMJ. 2021 Dec 1;375:n2330. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2330.
9
Effectiveness of 14 day quarantine strategy: Chinese experience of prevention and control.14 天隔离策略的有效性:中国的预防和控制经验。
BMJ. 2021 Dec 1;375:e066121. doi: 10.1136/BMJ-2021-066121.
10
Aggressive containment, suppression, and mitigation of covid-19: lessons learnt from eight countries.积极管控、抑制和缓解 2019 冠状病毒病:八个国家的经验教训。
BMJ. 2021 Nov 28;375:e067508. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-067508.