Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Departments of Medicine, Epidemiology and Population Health, Biomedical Data Science, and Statistics and Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Eur J Clin Invest. 2023 Feb;53(2):e13906. doi: 10.1111/eci.13906. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has entered its endemic phase and we observe significantly declining infection fatality rates due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). On this background, it is crucial but challenging to define current and future vaccine policy in a population with a high immunity against SARS-CoV-2 conferred by previous infections and/or vaccinations. Vaccine policy must consider the magnitude of the risks conferred by new infection(s) with current and evolving SARS-CoV-2 variants, how these risks vary in different groups of individuals, how to balance these risks against the apparently small, but existent, risks of harms of vaccination, and the cost-benefit of different options. More evidence from randomized controlled trials and continuously accumulating national health data is required to inform shared decision-making with people who consider vaccination options. Vaccine policy makers should cautiously weight what vaccination schedules are needed, and refrain from urging frequent vaccine boosters unless supported by sufficient evidence.
新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)大流行已进入地方性流行阶段,我们观察到严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)导致的感染病死率显著下降。在此背景下,对于既往感染和/或接种疫苗而对 SARS-CoV-2 具有高免疫力的人群,制定当前和未来的疫苗接种政策至关重要,但也极具挑战性。疫苗接种政策必须考虑到当前和不断演变的 SARS-CoV-2 变异株新感染带来的风险程度、这些风险在不同人群中的差异、如何在这些风险与接种疫苗带来的明显较小但确实存在的危害风险之间取得平衡,以及不同选择的成本效益。需要更多来自随机对照试验和不断积累的国家卫生数据的证据,以告知考虑疫苗接种选择的人群的共同决策。疫苗政策制定者应谨慎权衡需要哪些疫苗接种计划,并在没有充分证据支持的情况下,避免频繁呼吁加强疫苗接种。