Suppr超能文献

新冠疫情的教训:需要更好的卫生应急准备标准。

A COVID-19 Lesson: Better Health Emergency Preparedness Standards Are Needed.

作者信息

Moulton Anthony D

机构信息

Anthony D. Moulton, PhD, is a Senior Fellow, Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.

出版信息

Health Secur. 2022 Nov-Dec;20(6):457-466. doi: 10.1089/hs.2022.0037. Epub 2022 Nov 11.

Abstract

This article reports on an assessment of the value of 4 widely recognized standards of health sector emergency preparedness as predictors of effective preparedness for, and response to, the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. The standards are sponsored by the National Health Security Preparedness Index (NHSPI), the Trust for America's Health (TFAH), the Emergency Management Accreditation Program (EMAP), and the Public Health Accreditation Board (PHAB). The measure of effectiveness was states' cumulative COVID-19 deaths per 100,000 population, from January 21, 2020, through January 20, 2022. Linear regression analysis found no statistically significant associations when controlling for 3 intervening variables. Cross-tabulation of states' preparedness status with their COVID-19 death rates found that high NHSPI and TFAH preparedness scores were generally, but not uniformly, associated with lower death rates. EMAP and PHAB accreditation had negligible association with low or high death rates. Lack of accreditation was associated with lower death rates. Higher prior state public health spending related to COVID-19 preparedness and higher state household income, an indicator of state economic strength, were associated with lower death rates. States with Democratic control of the legislative and executive branches of government generally had substantially lower death rates than states with Republican control. A science-based, practice-oriented research initiative is recommended to improve the predictive power of health sector preparedness standards and to enhance protection for US residents from large-scale future health threats.

摘要

本文报告了对4项广泛认可的卫生部门应急准备标准的价值评估,这些标准可预测美国对新冠疫情的有效准备和应对情况。这些标准由国家卫生安全准备指数(NHSPI)、美国健康信托(TFAH)、应急管理认证计划(EMAP)和公共卫生认证委员会(PHAB)赞助。有效性的衡量标准是2020年1月21日至2022年1月20日期间各州每10万人口的新冠累计死亡人数。线性回归分析在控制3个干预变量时未发现统计学上的显著关联。将各州的准备状态与其新冠死亡率进行交叉列表分析发现,NHSPI和TFAH的高准备分数通常(但并非始终如此)与较低的死亡率相关。EMAP和PHAB认证与低死亡率或高死亡率的关联可忽略不计。未获得认证与较低的死亡率相关。与新冠疫情准备相关的州先前较高的公共卫生支出以及较高的州家庭收入(州经济实力的一个指标)与较低的死亡率相关。由民主党控制政府立法和行政部门的州的死亡率通常大大低于由共和党控制的州。建议开展一项基于科学、面向实践的研究倡议,以提高卫生部门准备标准的预测能力,并加强对美国居民免受未来大规模健康威胁的保护。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验