Suppr超能文献

奥密克戎 BA.1 和 BA.2 的快速抗原检测的可变检测。

Variable detection of Omicron-BA.1 and -BA.2 by SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests.

机构信息

Max Von Pettenkofer Institute and Gene Center, Virology, National Reference Center for Retroviruses, LMU München, Munich, Germany.

German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Med Microbiol Immunol. 2023 Feb;212(1):13-23. doi: 10.1007/s00430-022-00752-7. Epub 2022 Nov 12.

Abstract

During 2022, the COVID-19 pandemic has been dominated by the variant of concern (VoC) Omicron (B.1.1.529) and its rapidly emerging subvariants, including Omicron-BA.1 and -BA.2. Rapid antigen tests (RATs) are part of national testing strategies to identify SARS-CoV-2 infections on site in a community setting or to support layman's diagnostics at home. We and others have recently demonstrated an impaired RAT detection of infections caused by Omicron-BA.1 compared to Delta. Here, we evaluated the performance of five SARS-CoV-2 RATs in a single-centre laboratory study examining a total of 140 SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive respiratory swab samples, 70 Omicron-BA.1 and 70 Omicron-BA.2, as well as 52 SARS-CoV-2 PCR-negative swabs collected from March 8th until April 10th, 2022. One test did not meet minimal criteria for specificity. In an assessment of the analytical sensitivity in clinical specimen, the 50% limit of detection (LoD50) ranged from 4.2 × 10 to 9.2 × 10 RNA copies subjected to the RAT for Omicron-BA.1 compared to 1.3 × 10 to 1.5 × 10 for Omicron-BA.2. Overall, intra-assay differences for the detection of Omicron-BA.1-containing and Omicron-BA.2-containing samples were non-significant, while a marked overall heterogeneity among the five RATs was observed. To score positive in these point-of-care tests, up to 22-fold (LoD50) or 68-fold (LoD95) higher viral loads were required for the worst performing compared to the best performing RAT. The rates of true-positive test results for these Omicron subvariant-containing samples in the highest viral load category (Ct values < 25) ranged between 44.7 and 91.1%, while they dropped to 8.7 to 22.7% for samples with intermediate Ct values (25-30). In light of recent reports on the emergence of two novel Omicron-BA.2 subvariants, Omicron-BA.2.75 and BJ.1, awareness must be increased for the overall reduced detection rate and marked differences in RAT performance for these Omicron subvariants.

摘要

2022 年期间,COVID-19 大流行主要由关注变体(VOC)奥密克戎(B.1.1.529)及其迅速出现的亚变体,包括奥密克戎-BA.1 和 -BA.2 主导。快速抗原检测(RAT)是国家检测策略的一部分,用于在社区环境中现场识别 SARS-CoV-2 感染,或支持在家中进行非专业人员的诊断。我们和其他人最近证明,与 Delta 相比,RAT 对奥密克戎-BA.1 引起的感染的检测能力受损。在这里,我们评估了五种 SARS-CoV-2 RAT 在一项单中心实验室研究中的性能,该研究共检测了 140 份 SARS-CoV-2 PCR 阳性呼吸道拭子样本,其中 70 份为奥密克戎-BA.1,70 份为奥密克戎-BA.2,以及 2022 年 3 月 8 日至 4 月 10 日采集的 52 份 SARS-CoV-2 PCR 阴性拭子。一种检测方法不符合特异性的最低标准。在对临床标本进行分析灵敏度评估时,奥密克戎-BA.1 的 50%检测限(LoD50)范围为 4.2×10 至 9.2×10 RNA 拷贝,而奥密克戎-BA.2 的 LoD50 为 1.3×10 至 1.5×10。总体而言,检测奥密克戎-BA.1 含样本和奥密克戎-BA.2 含样本的检测的室内差异无统计学意义,而五个 RAT 之间观察到明显的总体异质性。在这些即时检测中,与表现最好的 RAT 相比,最差的 RAT 检测奥密克戎-BA.1 含样本和奥密克戎-BA.2 含样本所需的病毒载量最高需要高出 22 倍(LoD50)或 68 倍(LoD95)。在最高病毒载量类别(Ct 值<25)中,这些奥密克戎亚变体含样本的真阳性检测结果率在 44.7%至 91.1%之间,而在 Ct 值为 25-30 的中间样本中,检测结果率降至 8.7%至 22.7%。鉴于最近关于两种新型奥密克戎-BA.2 亚变体奥密克戎-BA.2.75 和 BJ.1 出现的报道,必须提高对这些奥密克戎亚变体总体检测率降低和 RAT 性能差异的认识。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f3c/9925595/b8df3c34f332/430_2022_752_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验