Donlon P T, Meadow A, Tupin J P, Wahba M
J Clin Psychiatry. 1978 Nov;39(11):800-4.
This rater blind project compared the efficacy and safety of using an oral rapid or neuroleptization method (maximum 80 mg./day) versus fixed standard dosage (20 mg./day) fluphenazine, a commonly used neuroleptic. There were 32 hospitalized, acutely decompensated schizophrenic patients in the experiment; the study period for each patient was a maximum of 7 days. The data were collected using the Benjamin Proverb Test and rating scales for psychopathology and adverse effects. Data analysis by means of the analysis of covariance demonstrated few significant differences between the 2 treatment methods: both methods produced a similar reduction in psychopathological symptoms and incidence of adverse effects. The authors conclude that the rapid neuroleptization method is not superior to the fixed standard dosage method in treating acute schizophrenia.
这个评定者盲法项目比较了口服快速或神经阻滞化方法(最大剂量80毫克/天)与固定标准剂量(20毫克/天)氟奋乃静(一种常用抗精神病药)的疗效和安全性。实验中有32名住院的急性失代偿性精神分裂症患者;每位患者的研究期最长为7天。数据通过本杰明谚语测试以及精神病理学和不良反应评定量表收集。通过协方差分析进行的数据分析表明,两种治疗方法之间几乎没有显著差异:两种方法在减轻精神病理症状和不良反应发生率方面效果相似。作者得出结论,在治疗急性精神分裂症方面,快速神经阻滞化方法并不优于固定标准剂量方法。