• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ImSURE 体模:用于放射组学软件基准测试和研究的数字数据集。

The ImSURE phantoms: a digital dataset for radiomic software benchmarking and investigation.

机构信息

Medical Physics Department, Veneto Institute of Oncology - IOV IRCCS, Padova, Italy.

Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

出版信息

Sci Data. 2022 Nov 12;9(1):695. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01715-6.

DOI:10.1038/s41597-022-01715-6
PMID:36371503
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9653377/
Abstract

In radiology and oncology, radiomic models are increasingly employed to predict clinical outcomes, but their clinical deployment has been hampered by lack of standardisation. This hindrance has driven the international Image Biomarker Standardisation Initiative (IBSI) to define guidelines for image pre-processing, standardise the formulation and nomenclature of 169 radiomic features and share two benchmark digital phantoms for software calibration. However, to better assess the concordance of radiomic tools, more heterogeneous phantoms are needed. We created two digital phantoms, called ImSURE phantoms, having isotropic and anisotropic voxel size, respectively, and 90 regions of interest (ROIs) each. To use these phantoms, we designed a systematic feature extraction workflow including 919 different feature values (obtained from the 169 IBSI-standardised features considering all possible combinations of feature aggregation and intensity discretisation methods). The ImSURE phantoms will allow to assess the concordance of radiomic software depending on interpolation, discretisation and aggregation methods, as well as on ROI volume and shape. Eventually, we provide the feature values extracted from these phantoms using five open-source IBSI-compliant software.

摘要

在放射学和肿瘤学领域,越来越多地使用放射组学模型来预测临床结果,但由于缺乏标准化,其临床应用受到了阻碍。这一障碍促使国际影像生物标志物标准化倡议(IBSI)定义了图像预处理的指南,标准化了 169 个放射组学特征的表述和命名,并共享了两个用于软件校准的基准数字体模。然而,为了更好地评估放射组学工具的一致性,需要更多异质的体模。我们创建了两个数字体模,分别称为 ImSURE 体模,具有各向同性和各向异性体素大小,每个体模各有 90 个感兴趣区(ROI)。为了使用这些体模,我们设计了一个系统的特征提取工作流程,包括 919 种不同的特征值(从考虑所有特征聚合和强度离散化方法的组合的 169 个 IBSI 标准化特征中获得)。ImSURE 体模将能够根据插值、离散化和聚合方法以及 ROI 体积和形状来评估放射组学软件的一致性。最后,我们使用五个符合 IBSI 标准的开源软件提供了从这些体模中提取的特征值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f16b/9653377/aa651316f8e8/41597_2022_1715_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f16b/9653377/3595ac904164/41597_2022_1715_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f16b/9653377/0957b83e79bc/41597_2022_1715_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f16b/9653377/ed77e89b0532/41597_2022_1715_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f16b/9653377/38905c391ea4/41597_2022_1715_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f16b/9653377/627ed8819d17/41597_2022_1715_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f16b/9653377/aa651316f8e8/41597_2022_1715_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f16b/9653377/3595ac904164/41597_2022_1715_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f16b/9653377/0957b83e79bc/41597_2022_1715_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f16b/9653377/ed77e89b0532/41597_2022_1715_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f16b/9653377/38905c391ea4/41597_2022_1715_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f16b/9653377/627ed8819d17/41597_2022_1715_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f16b/9653377/aa651316f8e8/41597_2022_1715_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The ImSURE phantoms: a digital dataset for radiomic software benchmarking and investigation.ImSURE 体模:用于放射组学软件基准测试和研究的数字数据集。
Sci Data. 2022 Nov 12;9(1):695. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01715-6.
2
A Novel Benchmarking Approach to Assess the Agreement among Radiomic Tools.一种新的基准评估方法,用于评估放射组学工具之间的一致性。
Radiology. 2022 Jun;303(3):533-541. doi: 10.1148/radiol.211604. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
3
Technical Note: ROdiomiX: A validated software for radiomics analysis of medical images in radiation oncology.技术说明:ROdiomiX:一种经过验证的用于放射肿瘤学中医学图像放射组学分析的软件。
Med Phys. 2021 Jan;48(1):354-365. doi: 10.1002/mp.14590. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
4
Benchmarking Various Radiomic Toolkit Features While Applying the Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative toward Clinical Translation of Radiomic Analysis.针对放射组学分析的临床转化应用,在采用影像生物标志物标准化倡议的同时,对各种放射组学工具包特征进行基准测试。
J Digit Imaging. 2021 Oct;34(5):1156-1170. doi: 10.1007/s10278-021-00506-6. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
5
Reliability and prognostic value of radiomic features are highly dependent on choice of feature extraction platform.放射组特征的可靠性和预后价值高度依赖于特征提取平台的选择。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Nov;30(11):6241-6250. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06957-9. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
6
Technical Note: An IBEX adaption toward image biomarker standardization.技术说明:IBEX 向图像生物标志物标准化的适配。
Med Phys. 2020 Mar;47(3):1167-1173. doi: 10.1002/mp.13956. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
7
Radiomics software comparison using digital phantom and patient data: IBSI-compliance does not guarantee concordance of feature values.基于数字体模和患者数据的放射组学软件比较:符合 IBSI 标准并不能保证特征值的一致性。
Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2022 Sep 13;8(6). doi: 10.1088/2057-1976/ac8e6f.
8
Current state of radiomic research in pancreatic cancer: focusing on study design and reproducibility of findings.当前胰腺癌放射组学研究的现状:重点关注研究设计和研究结果的可重复性。
Eur Radiol. 2023 Oct;33(10):6659-6669. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09653-6. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
9
RaCaT: An open source and easy to use radiomics calculator tool.RaCaT:一款开源且易于使用的放射组学计算器工具。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 20;14(2):e0212223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212223. eCollection 2019.
10
Assessing radiomic feature robustness to interpolation in F-FDG PET imaging.评估 F-FDG PET 成像中放射组学特征对插值的稳健性。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 4;9(1):9649. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46030-0.

本文引用的文献

1
A Novel Benchmarking Approach to Assess the Agreement among Radiomic Tools.一种新的基准评估方法,用于评估放射组学工具之间的一致性。
Radiology. 2022 Jun;303(3):533-541. doi: 10.1148/radiol.211604. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
2
Standardization in Quantitative Imaging: A Multicenter Comparison of Radiomic Features from Different Software Packages on Digital Reference Objects and Patient Data Sets.定量成像标准化:不同软件包从数字参考对象和患者数据集提取的放射组学特征的多中心比较。
Tomography. 2020 Jun;6(2):118-128. doi: 10.18383/j.tom.2019.00031.
3
Reliability and prognostic value of radiomic features are highly dependent on choice of feature extraction platform.
放射组特征的可靠性和预后价值高度依赖于特征提取平台的选择。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Nov;30(11):6241-6250. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06957-9. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
4
The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: Standardized Quantitative Radiomics for High-Throughput Image-based Phenotyping.影像生物标志物标准化倡议:高通量基于影像表型的标准化定量放射组学。
Radiology. 2020 May;295(2):328-338. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020191145. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
5
Technical Note: An IBEX adaption toward image biomarker standardization.技术说明:IBEX 向图像生物标志物标准化的适配。
Med Phys. 2020 Mar;47(3):1167-1173. doi: 10.1002/mp.13956. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
6
Variation in algorithm implementation across radiomics software.不同放射组学软件在算法实现上的差异。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2018 Oct;5(4):044505. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.5.4.044505. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
7
RaCaT: An open source and easy to use radiomics calculator tool.RaCaT:一款开源且易于使用的放射组学计算器工具。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 20;14(2):e0212223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212223. eCollection 2019.
8
Assessing robustness of radiomic features by image perturbation.通过图像扰动评估放射组学特征的稳健性。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jan 24;9(1):614. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36938-4.
9
Computational Radiomics System to Decode the Radiographic Phenotype.用于解码影像学表型的计算放射组学系统
Cancer Res. 2017 Nov 1;77(21):e104-e107. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0339.
10
Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine.放射组学:医学影像与个性化医疗之间的桥梁。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec;14(12):749-762. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.141. Epub 2017 Oct 4.