Suppr超能文献

斜率识别与决策:线性图与比率图的比较

Slope Identification and Decision Making: A Comparison of Linear and Ratio Graphs.

机构信息

The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, USA.

University of Iowa, USA.

出版信息

Behav Modif. 2023 May;47(3):615-643. doi: 10.1177/01454455221130002. Epub 2022 Nov 13.

Abstract

Applied behavior analysts have traditionally relied on visual analysis of graphic data displays to determine the extent of functional relations between variables and guide treatment implementation. The present study assessed the influence of graph type on behavior analysts' ( = 51) ratings of trend magnitude, treatment decisions based on changes in trend, and their confidence in decision making. Participants examined simulated data presented on linear graphs featuring equal-interval scales as well as graphs with ratio scales (i.e., multiply/divide or logarithmic vertical axis) and numeric indicators of celeration. Standard rules for interpreting trends using each display accompanied the assessment items. Results suggested participants maintained significantly higher levels of agreement on evaluations of trend magnitude and treatment decisions and reported higher levels of confidence in making decisions when using ratio graphs. Furthermore, decision making occurred most efficiently with ratio charts and a celeration value. The findings have implications for research and practice.

摘要

应用行为分析师传统上依赖于对图形数据显示的视觉分析来确定变量之间功能关系的程度,并指导治疗的实施。本研究评估了图表类型对行为分析师(= 51)对趋势幅度的评估、基于趋势变化的治疗决策以及他们对决策的信心的影响。参与者检查了在具有等距刻度的线性图以及具有比例刻度(即乘/除或对数垂直轴)和加速度数值指标的图上呈现的模拟数据。评估项目伴随着使用每种显示方式解释趋势的标准规则。结果表明,参与者在评估趋势幅度和治疗决策方面保持了显著更高的一致性水平,并且在使用比例图时报告了更高的决策信心水平。此外,使用比例图表和加速度值可以最有效地进行决策。研究结果对研究和实践具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7aa4/10150256/379d2e9da4a8/10.1177_01454455221130002-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Slope Identification and Decision Making: A Comparison of Linear and Ratio Graphs.
Behav Modif. 2023 May;47(3):615-643. doi: 10.1177/01454455221130002. Epub 2022 Nov 13.
2
Three Alternatives for Graphing Behavioral Data: A Comparison of Usability and Acceptability.
Behav Modif. 2022 Jan;46(1):3-35. doi: 10.1177/0145445520946321. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
3
The effects of celeration lines on visual data analysis.
Behav Modif. 2006 May;30(3):295-314. doi: 10.1177/0145445503262406.
5
A Clarification of Slope and Scale.
Behav Modif. 2022 Jan;46(1):90-127. doi: 10.1177/0145445520953366. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
9
The effect of cognitive load on decision making with graphically displayed uncertainty information.
Risk Anal. 2014 Aug;34(8):1495-505. doi: 10.1111/risa.12161. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
10
A Decade Review of Two Potential Analysis Altering Variables in Graph Construction.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2022 Feb;52(2):714-724. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-04959-0. Epub 2021 Mar 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Bringing Data-Based Individualization to Scale: A Call for the Next-Generation Technology of Teacher Supports.
J Learn Disabil. 2021 Sep;54(5):319-333. doi: 10.1177/0022219420950654. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
2
Search and Selection Procedures of Literature Reviews in Behavior Analysis.
Perspect Behav Sci. 2020 Aug 20;43(4):725-760. doi: 10.1007/s40614-020-00265-9. eCollection 2020 Dec.
3
Single-case experimental designs: Characteristics, changes, and challenges.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2021 Jan;115(1):56-85. doi: 10.1002/jeab.638. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
4
Three Alternatives for Graphing Behavioral Data: A Comparison of Usability and Acceptability.
Behav Modif. 2022 Jan;46(1):3-35. doi: 10.1177/0145445520946321. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
5
Predict, Control, and Replicate to Understand: How Statistics Can Foster the Fundamental Goals of Science.
Perspect Behav Sci. 2018 Sep 5;42(1):109-132. doi: 10.1007/s40614-018-0171-8. eCollection 2019 Mar.
6
Single-Case Data Analysis: A Practitioner Guide for Accurate and Reliable Decisions.
Behav Modif. 2023 Nov;47(6):1455-1481. doi: 10.1177/0145445519867054. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
7
Beyond inference by eye: Statistical and graphing practices in JEAB, 1992-2017.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2019 Mar;111(2):155-165. doi: 10.1002/jeab.509. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
9
Between-case standardized effect size analysis of single case designs: Examination of the two methods.
Res Dev Disabil. 2018 Aug;79:88-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 May 26.
10
The effect of data points per x- to y-axis ratio on visual analysts evaluation of single-case graphs.
Sch Psychol Q. 2018 Jun;33(2):314-322. doi: 10.1037/spq0000243. Epub 2018 Feb 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验