Tunneling Group, Biotechnology Centre, Silesian University of Technology, Krzywoustego 8, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.
J Chem Inf Model. 2022 Dec 26;62(24):6803-6811. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00985. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
Different methods for tunnel identification, geometry-based and small-molecule tracking approaches, were compared to provide their benefits and pitfalls. Results obtained for both crystal structures and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were analyzed to investigate if a more computationally demanding method would be beneficial. Careful examination of the results is essential for the low-diameter tunnel description, and assessment of the tunnel functionality based only on their geometrical parameters is challenging. We showed that the small-molecule tracking approach can provide a detailed description of the system; however, it can also be the most computationally demanding.
不同的隧道识别方法,基于几何形状和小分子追踪方法,被进行了比较,以展示它们的优缺点。对晶体结构和分子动力学(MD)模拟的结果进行了分析,以研究更具计算挑战性的方法是否有益。仔细检查结果对于低直径隧道的描述至关重要,并且仅基于几何参数评估隧道功能是具有挑战性的。我们表明,小分子追踪方法可以提供系统的详细描述;然而,它也可能是计算量最大的方法。