Department of Laboratory Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Dec 21;10(6):e0277522. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02775-22. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
Nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) or washings have traditionally been used to diagnose respiratory tract infections. Reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) is widely used for rapid viral detection using samples from the upper respiratory tract. However, RT-PCR is rarely applied to sputum samples, mainly due to the viscosity of sputum. Thus, we assessed the detection rates of respiratory viruses from NPS, sputum samples, and combined NPS and sputum samples using multiplex RT-PCR (Allplex respiratory panels I, II, and III; Seegene, Seoul, South Korea). Paired NPS and sputum samples were collected from 219 patients admitted to the hospital with acute respiratory illnesses from October to December 2019. RT-PCR was performed on each sample for virus detection. Combined samples for virus detection were produced using remnant NPS and sputum samples with a positive virus signal. Respiratory viral nucleic acid was identified in 92 (42%) of 219 patients. Among the 92 viral detections, 61 (28%) were detected by both NPS and sputum samples. Twenty-four (11%) were sputum positive/NPS negative, and seven (3%) were sputum negative/NPS positive. For the combined NPS-sputum samples ( = 92), all paired samples positive in both specimens ( = 61) were also positive in the combined NPS-sputum sample. Twenty-seven (87%) of the 31 discordant paired samples were positive in the combined samples. Out of the total of 103 viruses identified before combining the samples, the detection rate of the combined samples was 94% (97/103), which was higher than the detection rates of sputum (88%; 91/103) and NPS (71%; 73/103). Because additional tests incur additional costs, our findings suggest that combining samples instead of testing separate samples using RT-PCR is likely the most cost-effective method of viral testing for patients with acute respiratory illnesses. This study reveals that RT-PCR utilizing sputum significantly increased the detection rate for respiratory viral nucleic acids among adult patients admitted to the hospital, compared to nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS). Notably, combined samples of sputum and NPS maintained the majority of the improved sputum detection rate with only a few positive signal losses from NPS samples. In order to detect respiratory viruses in adult patients with acute respiratory illness, it is important to choose the optimal respiratory samples. This study helped to improve our understanding of this process.
鼻咽拭子(NPS)或冲洗液传统上用于诊断呼吸道感染。逆转录酶聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)广泛用于使用上呼吸道样本进行快速病毒检测。然而,RT-PCR 很少应用于痰样本,主要是因为痰的粘性。因此,我们使用多重 RT-PCR(Allplex 呼吸道 panel I、II 和 III;Seegene,首尔,韩国)评估了 NPS、痰样本和 NPS 与痰组合样本中呼吸道病毒的检测率。2019 年 10 月至 12 月,从因急性呼吸道疾病住院的 219 名患者中采集配对的 NPS 和痰样本。对每个样本进行 RT-PCR 以检测病毒。使用具有阳性病毒信号的剩余 NPS 和痰样本对病毒检测进行组合样本。在 219 名患者中,92 名(42%)患者的呼吸道病毒核酸得到鉴定。在 92 例病毒检测中,61 例(28%)NPS 和痰样本均呈阳性。24 例(11%)为痰阳性/NPS 阴性,7 例(3%)为痰阴性/NPS 阳性。对于 NPS-痰组合样本(n=92),在两种标本中均呈阳性的所有配对样本(n=61)在 NPS-痰组合样本中也呈阳性。31 对有差异的配对样本中,27 对(87%)在组合样本中呈阳性。在组合样本之前,共鉴定了 103 种病毒,组合样本的检测率为 94%(97/103),高于痰(88%;91/103)和 NPS(71%;73/103)的检测率。因为额外的测试会产生额外的成本,我们的研究结果表明,对于急性呼吸道疾病患者,使用 RT-PCR 组合样本而不是分别测试样本可能是最具成本效益的病毒检测方法。本研究表明,与鼻咽拭子(NPS)相比,利用痰进行 RT-PCR 显著提高了住院成年患者呼吸道病毒核酸的检测率。值得注意的是,NPS 样本的阳性信号丢失很少,痰和 NPS 的组合样本保持了大部分提高的痰检测率。为了在急性呼吸道疾病的成年患者中检测呼吸道病毒,选择最佳的呼吸道样本非常重要。本研究有助于提高我们对这一过程的理解。