• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Assessing the Impact of Standardized Patient Encounters on Students' Medical History-taking Skills in Practice.评估标准化患者就诊对学生实践中病史采集技能的影响。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 Apr;87(4):ajpe8989. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8989. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
2
Pharmacy students' medication history taking competency: Simulation and feedback learning intervention.药学专业学生的用药史采集能力:模拟与反馈学习干预
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2019 Oct;11(10):1002-1015. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
3
Patient simulation to demonstrate students' competency in core domain abilities prior to beginning advanced pharmacy practice experiences.患者模拟,在开始高级药学实践经验之前,展示学生在核心领域能力方面的能力。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2012 Nov 12;76(9):176. doi: 10.5688/ajpe769176.
4
An educational tool for teaching medication history taking to pharmacy students.一种用于向药学学生教授用药史采集的教学工具。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Jun 12;77(5):105. doi: 10.5688/ajpe775105.
5
Use of a virtual patient simulation program to enhance the physical assessment and medical history taking skills of doctor of pharmacy students.利用虚拟患者模拟程序提高药学博士学生的体格检查和病史采集技能。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2020 Jul;12(7):810-816. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2020.02.008. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
6
"It's like rotations, but in the classroom": Creation of an innovative course to prepare students for advanced pharmacy practice experiences.“这就像轮转实习,但却是在教室里进行”:创建一门创新课程,帮助学生为高级药学实践经验做好准备。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 Nov;9(6):1129-1140. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.07.009. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
7
The use of virtual patients to teach medical students history taking and communication skills.使用虚拟患者来教授医学生病史采集和沟通技巧。
Am J Surg. 2006 Jun;191(6):806-11. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.03.002.
8
Impact of virtual simulation in self-care therapeutics course on introductory pharmacy practice experience self-care encounters.虚拟模拟在自我护理治疗课程中对基础药学实践经验自我护理接触的影响。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2020 Jan;12(1):74-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2019.10.015. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
9
Curriculum renewal: Alignment of introductory pharmacy practice experiences with didactic course content.课程更新:药学实践入门经验与理论课程内容的对接。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 Nov;9(6):1063-1070. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.07.017. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
10
Simulation Design, Findings, and Call to Action for Managing Difficult Patient Encounters.模拟设计、结果与应对棘手患者场景的行动呼吁。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2021 Aug;85(7):8327. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8327. Epub 2021 Jan 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing Clinical Spanish Proficiency Through Standardized Patient Interactions: A Case Study on Medical Students' Performance.通过标准化患者互动提高临床西班牙语能力:医学生表现的案例研究
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Mar 10;25(1):358. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06966-6.
2
Global trends and hotpots in standardised patients research in the last 30 years: A bibliometric analysis.过去30年标准化病人研究的全球趋势与热点:一项文献计量分析。
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 23;10(17):e36701. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36701. eCollection 2024 Sep 15.
3
Exploring the Impact of a Vicarious Learning Approach on Student Pharmacists' Professional Identity Formation Using a Simulated Pharmacist-Patient Encounter.运用模拟药剂师 - 患者问诊,探索替代性学习方法对学生药剂师职业身份形成的影响。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2023 Nov 16;11(6):177. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy11060177.
4
Exploring the Impact of an Innovative Peer Role-Play Simulation to Cultivate Student Pharmacists' Motivational Interviewing Skills.探索创新的同伴角色扮演模拟对培养学生药剂师动机性访谈技巧的影响。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2023 Jul 29;11(4):122. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy11040122.

本文引用的文献

1
Revising the Center for the Advancement of Pharmacy Education (CAPE) Educational Outcomes and Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs): The Report of the 2021-2022 Academic Affairs Standing Committee.修订药学教育促进中心 (CAPE) 教育成果和可委托的专业活动 (EPAs):2021-2022 年学术事务常务委员会的报告。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 Jan;87(1):ajpe9453. doi: 10.5688/ajpe9453.
2
Assessing Clinical Reasoning: Targeting the Higher Levels of the Pyramid.评估临床推理:瞄准金字塔的更高层次。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Aug;34(8):1631-1636. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04953-4.
3
The Association of Standardized Patient Educators (ASPE) Standards of Best Practice (SOBP).标准化患者教育工作者协会(ASPE)最佳实践标准(SOBP)。
Adv Simul (Lond). 2017 Jun 27;2:10. doi: 10.1186/s41077-017-0043-4. eCollection 2017.
4
Thinking Clinically from the Beginning: Early Introduction of the Pharmacists' Patient Care Process.从一开始就进行临床思维:药剂师患者护理流程的早期引入。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Dec 25;80(10):164. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8010164.
5
Unannounced standardized patients: a promising method of assessing patient-centered care in your health care system.未事先通知的标准化病人:一种评估您的医疗保健系统中以病人为中心的护理的有前景的方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Apr 5;14:157. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-157.
6
An educational tool for teaching medication history taking to pharmacy students.一种用于向药学学生教授用药史采集的教学工具。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Jun 12;77(5):105. doi: 10.5688/ajpe775105.
7
Transitioning knowledge gained from simulation to pharmacy practice.将从模拟中获得的知识转化为药学实践。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Dec 15;75(10):210. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7510210.
8
Evaluating the effectiveness of rating instruments for a communication skills assessment of medical residents.评估评价工具在评估住院医师沟通技巧方面的有效性。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009 Oct;14(4):575-94. doi: 10.1007/s10459-008-9142-2. Epub 2008 Nov 5.
9
Unannounced standardised patients in real practice: a systematic literature review.实际医疗实践中的未事先通知的标准化患者:一项系统文献综述。
Med Educ. 2007 Jun;41(6):537-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02689.x.

评估标准化患者就诊对学生实践中病史采集技能的影响。

Assessing the Impact of Standardized Patient Encounters on Students' Medical History-taking Skills in Practice.

机构信息

Long Island University, Arnold & Marie Schwartz College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Brooklyn, New York

Long Island University, Arnold & Marie Schwartz College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Brooklyn, New York.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 Apr;87(4):ajpe8989. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8989. Epub 2022 Nov 14.

DOI:10.5688/ajpe8989
PMID:36375843
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10159019/
Abstract

To investigate whether exposing students to professional standardized patients (SPs) in a didactic course would impact the transferability of students' medical history-taking skills to practice. In 2018, peer role-play and virtual simulation activities were used to teach medical history-taking in a first-year physical assessment and medication administration course. An unannounced SP evaluated students' medical history-taking skills during a subsequent community introductory pharmacy practice experience (IPPE) using a 17-item medical history checklist. In 2019, 3 SP encounters were added to the course to supplement existing learning activities. This student cohort was then assessed by the same unannounced SP during their IPPE in summer 2019. Medical history-taking performance was compared with the 2018 control group to assess the impact of the changes to the course. Thirty-nine students in both the summer 2018 and 2019 cohorts had usable data. There was a statistically significant increase in the 2019 mean composite score on the medical history checklist (24.3 vs 18.1). The 2019 cohort performed significantly better than the 2018 cohort in 7 of the 17 items on the checklist. The correlation between students' performance on the summative medical history-taking assessment during the course and their performance in practice was =.15 in 2018 and =.08 in 2019. Incorporating SPs into a physical assessment and medication administration course contributed to an improvement in students' ability to take a medical history in practice as compared with solely using a virtual patient simulation program.

摘要

为了研究在理论课程中让学生接触专业标准化病人(SP)是否会影响他们将病史采集技能转移到实践中的能力。2018 年,在第一年的物理评估和药物管理课程中,使用同伴角色扮演和虚拟模拟活动来教授病史采集。在随后的社区介绍药学实践经验(IPPE)中,一名未事先通知的 SP 使用 17 项病史检查表评估学生的病史采集技能。2019 年,课程中增加了 3 次 SP 接触,以补充现有学习活动。然后,同一未事先通知的 SP 在 2019 年夏季的 IPPE 中对这一学生群体进行评估。将病史采集表现与 2018 年的对照组进行比较,以评估课程变化的影响。2018 年和 2019 年夏季队列的 39 名学生都有可用数据。2019 年的病史检查表综合评分(24.3 分比 18.1 分)有显著提高。在检查表的 17 项中的 7 项中,2019 年的队列比 2018 年的队列表现更好。2018 年,学生在课程中总结性病史采集评估中的表现与他们在实践中的表现之间的相关性为.15,而 2019 年为.08。与仅使用虚拟患者模拟程序相比,将 SP 纳入物理评估和药物管理课程有助于提高学生在实践中采集病史的能力。