Suppr超能文献

经腹腹膜前补片修补术(TAPP)能否实现微创腹壁疝修补的良好效果?系统评价和荟萃分析。

Can ventral TAPP achieve favorable outcomes in minimally invasive ventral hernia repair? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

A21 Surgery Department, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Research Laboratory LR12ES01, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Tunis El Manar University, Rue 9 Avril, Bab Saadoun, 1007, Tunis, Tunisia.

出版信息

Hernia. 2023 Aug;27(4):729-739. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02709-4. Epub 2022 Nov 15.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The concept of the transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) was transferred from the inguinal hernia repair to be adopted in minimally invasive ventral hernia repair (VHR) and since then it has been gaining popularity. However, there are minimal data supporting the ventral TAPP (vTAPP) technique which may lead to reticence in the adoption of this approach. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the outcomes of patients who received minimally invasive vTAPP for VHR.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic search was performed of PubMed, Science Direct, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library until July 2022. We selected studies that compared the vTAPP technique with any of other minimally invasive techniques. A meta-analysis was done for the outcomes of perioperative characteristics and postoperative parameters.

RESULTS

A total of 9 studies (1429 patients) were identified. vTAPP was associated with considerable benefit when compared to IPOM. vTAPP was less painful (MD = - 1.01; 95% CI [- 1.39, - 0.64], p < 0.00001), of reduced average cost (MD = - 457.10; 95% CI [- 457.27, - 456.92], p < 0.00001) and decreased SSI (OR = 0.29; 95% [0.09, 0.96], p = 0.04). On the other hand, the vTAPP approach consumed less operative time (MD: - 31.01, 95% CI [- 33.50, - 28.51]), p < 0.00001) and shorter hospital stay than the e-TEP approach.

CONCLUSION

vTAPP appears to be safe and effective procedure for VHR, superior or similar to other minimally invasive techniques for perioperative characteristics and short-term outcomes.

摘要

目的

经腹腹膜前(TAPP)的概念从腹股沟疝修补术转移到微创腹疝修补术(VHR)中,并从此得到广泛应用。然而,支持腹侧 TAPP(vTAPP)技术的数据很少,这可能导致人们对采用这种方法犹豫不决。本荟萃分析的目的是评估接受微创 vTAPP 治疗 VHR 的患者的结局。

研究设计

系统检索了 PubMed、Science Direct、Google Scholar 和 Cochrane Library,检索时间截至 2022 年 7 月。我们选择了比较 vTAPP 技术与任何其他微创技术的研究。对围手术期特征和术后参数的结果进行了荟萃分析。

结果

共确定了 9 项研究(1429 例患者)。与 IPOM 相比,vTAPP 具有显著优势。vTAPP 更无痛(MD=-1.01;95%CI[-1.39,-0.64],p<0.00001),平均成本降低(MD=-457.10;95%CI[-457.27,-456.92],p<0.00001),SSI 减少(OR=0.29;95%CI[0.09,0.96],p=0.04)。另一方面,vTAPP 方法的手术时间(MD:-31.01,95%CI[-33.50,-28.51])更短(p<0.00001),住院时间也比 e-TEP 方法更短。

结论

vTAPP 似乎是一种安全有效的 VHR 治疗方法,在围手术期特征和短期结局方面优于或类似于其他微创技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验