• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 DPSIR-TOPSIS-GM(1,1)模型的深圳市土地生态安全评价与预测。

Evaluation and prediction of land ecological security in Shenzhen based on DPSIR-TOPSIS-GM(1,1) model.

机构信息

College of Geography Science, Shanxi Normal University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Nov 15;17(11):e0265810. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265810. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0265810
PMID:36378637
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9665370/
Abstract

Land ecological security is the core of regional coordinated economic development and land ecological security planning. In this paper, with Shenzhen as the research area, 28 evaluation indicators were selected from 5 dimensions based on the DPSIR model to construct an indicator system for land ecological security evaluation, so as to evaluate the land ecological security status in the research area from 2009 to 2019. Based on the TOPSIS evaluation model, regional levels were determined, and finally the GM (1,1) model was adopted to scientifically predict the land ecological security system of Shenzhen from 2020 to 2025. The results showed that: (1) from the perspective of the main influencing factors, the weight of 16 indicators of Shenzhen's land ecological security exceeds 0.03, including the total output value of agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery (D5) and Engel coefficient (I4). These factors are the main factors that have led to the deterioration of land ecological security in Shenzhen in the past decade; (2) comprehensive situation analysis revealed that from 2009 to 2019, the level of land ecological security in Shenzhen exhibited an increasing trend overall, but the land ecological security in Shenzhen still needs to be greatly improved; (3) regarding various subsystems, from 2009 to 2019, except the pressure subsystem which was in a downward trend, other subsystems showed a fluctuating and upward trend; (4) after modeling and calculation using the GM (1,1) model, it was concluded that most of the indicator factors are in a slow growing trend with the social and economic development of Shenzhen, but severe land ecological problem still exists. The research result is expected to provide a reference for the stable and sustainable development of society and economy and regional land ecosystem protection.

摘要

土地生态安全是区域协调经济发展和土地生态安全规划的核心。本文以深圳市为研究区,基于 DPSIR 模型,从 5 个维度选取 28 个评价指标,构建土地生态安全评价指标体系,对研究区 2009-2019 年土地生态安全状况进行评价。基于逼近理想解排序法(TOPSIS)评价模型确定区域等级,并采用灰色预测模型 GM(1,1)对深圳市 2020-2025 年土地生态安全系统进行科学预测。结果表明:(1)从主要影响因素来看,深圳市土地生态安全的 16 项指标权重均超过 0.03,包括农业、林业、牧业、渔业总产值(D5)和恩格尔系数(I4)等,这些因素是导致深圳市近十年来土地生态安全状况恶化的主要因素;(2)综合态势分析表明,2009-2019 年深圳市土地生态安全水平整体呈上升趋势,但深圳市土地生态安全仍需大力改善;(3)各子系统方面,2009-2019 年除压力子系统呈下降趋势外,其他子系统均呈波动上升趋势;(4)通过 GM(1,1)模型建模与计算,得出深圳市大部分指标因子随社会经济发展呈缓慢增长趋势,但土地生态问题依然严峻。研究结果可为深圳市社会经济稳定可持续发展和区域土地生态系统保护提供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d18/9665370/0a622cc9b3be/pone.0265810.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d18/9665370/3b0509c7163b/pone.0265810.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d18/9665370/42761f8a97f1/pone.0265810.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d18/9665370/85c0dc9d9193/pone.0265810.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d18/9665370/a4c49321ae4a/pone.0265810.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d18/9665370/0b9f905800d1/pone.0265810.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d18/9665370/0a622cc9b3be/pone.0265810.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d18/9665370/3b0509c7163b/pone.0265810.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d18/9665370/42761f8a97f1/pone.0265810.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d18/9665370/85c0dc9d9193/pone.0265810.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d18/9665370/a4c49321ae4a/pone.0265810.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d18/9665370/0b9f905800d1/pone.0265810.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d18/9665370/0a622cc9b3be/pone.0265810.g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation and prediction of land ecological security in Shenzhen based on DPSIR-TOPSIS-GM(1,1) model.基于 DPSIR-TOPSIS-GM(1,1)模型的深圳市土地生态安全评价与预测。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 15;17(11):e0265810. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265810. eCollection 2022.
2
[Tourism ecological security early warning of Zhangjiajie, China based on the improved TOPSIS method and the grey GM (1,1)model].基于改进TOPSIS法和灰色GM(1,1)模型的中国张家界旅游生态安全预警
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2017 Nov;28(11):3731-3739. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201711.017.
3
Evaluation and diagnosis of obstacles to land-based ecological security in resource-based cities: A case study of Xingtai city.评价与诊断资源型城市陆域生态安全障碍——以邢台市为例
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 6;15(11):e0241618. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241618. eCollection 2020.
4
Spatial-temporal dynamics and scenario simulation of land ecological security: a case study of Deyang, Sichuan Province, China.土地生态安全的时空动态及情景模拟——以四川省德阳市为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Apr;28(16):20209-20221. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11837-2. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
5
Fuzzy evaluation of the ecological security of land resources in mainland China based on the Pressure-State-Response framework.基于压力-状态-响应框架的中国大陆土地资源生态安全模糊评价
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jan 15;804:150053. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150053. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
6
[Ecological security assessment of Baishan City in Jilin Province based on DPSIR].基于DPSIR模型的吉林省白山市生态安全评价
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2011 Jan;22(1):189-95.
7
Land Use Evolution and Land Ecological Security Evaluation Based on AHP-FCE Model: Evidence from China.基于层次分析法-模糊综合评价模型的土地利用演变与土地生态安全评价:来自中国的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 17;18(22):12076. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182212076.
8
[Spatial-temporal pattern and obstacle factors of cultivated land ecological security in major grain producing areas of northeast China: a case study in Jilin Province].[东北粮食主产区耕地生态安全时空格局及障碍因素——以吉林省为例]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2014 Feb;25(2):515-24.
9
Coastal ecological security assessment in Laizhou Bay, China: from the perspective of demographic-social-economic-natural complex ecosystem.中国莱州湾沿海生态安全评估:基于人口-社会-经济-自然复合生态系统视角。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jun;31(27):39232-39247. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-33703-1. Epub 2024 May 30.
10
The response of ecological security to land use change in east and west subtropical China.中国东西部亚热带地区土地利用变化对生态安全的响应。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 16;18(11):e0294462. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294462. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Research on fuzzy evaluation of ecological safety of land resources in Pearl river Delta area based on DPSIR framework.基于DPSIR框架的珠江三角洲地区土地资源生态安全模糊评价研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 7;15(1):8059. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93130-1.
2
Spatiotemporal patterns and prediction of landscape ecological security in Xishuangbanna from 1996-2030.1996-2030 年西双版纳景观生态安全的时空格局及预测。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 8;18(11):e0292875. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292875. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment.模糊环境下基于层次分析法和理想点法的转运地点选择
Waste Manag. 2008;28(9):1552-9. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.05.019. Epub 2007 Sep 4.
2
Fuzzy decision analysis for integrated environmental vulnerability assessment of the mid-Atlantic Region.大西洋中部地区综合环境脆弱性评估的模糊决策分析
Environ Manage. 2002 Jun;29(6):845-59. doi: 10.1007/s00267-001-2587-1.