Faculty of Social Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2023 Jul;18(4):743-748. doi: 10.1177/17456916221133826. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
Microaggression research has made great strides over the past decade while steadily pushing itself into mainstream psychological science. Yet the field remains firmly situated within the Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic (WEIRD) cultural context. Correspondingly, recurring criticisms against the validity of microaggressions are often rooted in individualist, decontextualized understandings of behavior, and critics' rebuttals are often grounded in a philosophical and reflective understanding of the cultural context. In this article, I put forward that (a) the enactments and appraisals of microaggressions are the behavioral results of the cognitive salience of cultural schemas; (b) cultural schemas are informed by cultural ideologies, underlining their methodological and empirical relevance for future research; and (c) cultures are dynamic by highlighting the effects of geopolitical events on the content of cultural schemas that may moderate the perception and enactment of microaggressions. For these reasons, I argue that a cultural psychology of microaggressions may help to depathologize the individual by situating behavior in its cultural context while at the same time necessitating the inclusion of communities residing in non-WEIRD societies.
微侵犯研究在过去十年中取得了巨大进展,同时稳步进入主流心理科学。然而,该领域仍然牢牢地处于西方、受过教育、工业化、富裕和民主(WEIRD)的文化背景中。相应地,对微侵犯有效性的反复批评往往根植于对行为的个人主义、非情境化理解,而批评者的反驳往往基于对文化背景的哲学和反思性理解。在本文中,我提出(a)微侵犯的实施和评估是文化图式认知显著性的行为结果;(b)文化图式受到文化意识形态的影响,强调了它们对未来研究的方法学和经验相关性;(c)通过强调地缘政治事件对可能调节微侵犯感知和实施的文化图式内容的影响,文化是动态的。基于这些原因,我认为微侵犯的文化心理学可以通过将行为置于其文化背景中来帮助非病态化个体,同时需要包括非 WEIRD 社会中居住的社区。