Hunter Ruth F, Cleland Claire L, Busby John, Nightingale Glenna, Kee Frank, Williams Andrew James, Kelly Paul, Kelly Michael P, Milton Karen, Kokka Kelly, Jepson Ruth
Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2022 Nov 15;77(1):17-25. doi: 10.1136/jech-2022-219729.
Evidence regarding the effectiveness of 20 miles per hour (mph) speed limit interventions is limited, and rarely have long-term outcomes been assessed. We investigate the effect of a 20 mph speed limit intervention on road traffic collisions, casualties, speed and volume at 1 and 3 years post-implementation.
An observational, repeated cross-sectional design was implemented, using routinely collected data for road traffic collisions, casualties, speed and volume. We evaluated difference-in-differences in collisions and casualties (intervention vs control) across three different time series and traffic speed and volume pre-implementation, at 1 and 3 years post-implementation.
Small reductions in road traffic collisions were observed at year 1 (3%; p=0.82) and year 3 post-implementation (15%; p=0.31) at the intervention site. Difference-in-differences analyses showed no statistically significant differences between the intervention and control sites over time for road traffic collisions. There were 16% (p=0.18) and 22% (p=0.06) reductions in casualty rates at years 1 and 3 post-implementation, respectively, at the intervention site. Results showed little change in mean traffic speed at year 1 (0.2 mph, 95% CI -0.3 to 2.4, p=0.14) and year 3 post-implementation (0.8, 95% CI -1.5 to 2.5, p=0.17). For traffic volume, a decrease in 57 vehicles per week was observed at year 1 (95% CI -162 to -14, p<0.00) and 71 vehicles at year 3 (95% CI -213 to 1, p=0.05) post-implementation.
A 20 mph speed limit intervention implemented at city centre scale had little impact on long-term outcomes including road traffic collisions, casualties and speed, except for a reduction in traffic volume. Policymakers considering implementing 20 mph speed limit interventions should consider the fidelity, context and scale of implementation.
关于每小时20英里(mph)限速干预措施有效性的证据有限,而且很少对长期结果进行评估。我们调查了每小时20英里限速干预措施在实施后1年和3年对道路交通事故、伤亡情况、车速和交通流量的影响。
采用观察性重复横断面设计,使用常规收集的道路交通事故、伤亡情况、车速和交通流量数据。我们评估了在实施前、实施后1年和3年这三个不同时间序列中,干预组与对照组在碰撞事故和伤亡情况方面的差异。
在干预地点,实施后第1年道路交通事故略有减少(3%;p = 0.82),第3年减少了15%(p = 0.31)。差异分析显示,随着时间推移,干预组和对照组在道路交通事故方面没有统计学上的显著差异。在干预地点,实施后第1年和第3年伤亡率分别降低了16%(p = 0.18)和22%(p = 0.06)。结果显示,实施后第1年平均车速变化不大(0.2 mph,95%可信区间 -0.3至2.4,p = 0.14),第3年也仅有0.8(95%可信区间 -1.5至2.5,p = 0.17)。对于交通流量,实施后第1年每周减少57辆车(95%可信区间 -162至 -14,p < 0.00),第3年减少71辆车(95%可信区间 -213至1,p = 0.05)。
在市中心规模实施的每小时20英里限速干预措施对包括道路交通事故、伤亡情况和车速在内的长期结果影响不大,不过交通流量有所减少。考虑实施每小时20英里限速干预措施的政策制定者应考虑实施的保真度、背景和规模。