• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1986 - 2006年伦敦每小时20英里交通限速区对道路伤害的影响:对照中断时间序列分析

Effect of 20 mph traffic speed zones on road injuries in London, 1986-2006: controlled interrupted time series analysis.

作者信息

Grundy Chris, Steinbach Rebecca, Edwards Phil, Green Judith, Armstrong Ben, Wilkinson Paul

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT.

出版信息

BMJ. 2009 Dec 10;339:b4469. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b4469.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.b4469
PMID:20007666
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2791801/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the effect of the introduction of 20 mph (32 km an hour) traffic speed zones on road collisions, injuries, and fatalities in London.

DESIGN

Observational study based on analysis of geographically coded police data on road casualties, 1986-2006. Analyses were made of longitudinal changes in counts of road injuries within each of 119 029 road segments with at least one casualty with conditional fixed effects Poisson models. Estimates of the effect of introducing 20 mph zones on casualties within those zones and in adjacent areas were adjusted for the underlying downward trend in traffic casualties.

SETTING

London.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

All casualties from road collisions; those killed and seriously injured (KSI).

RESULTS

The introduction of 20 mph zones was associated with a 41.9% (95% confidence interval 36.0% to 47.8%) reduction in road casualties, after adjustment for underlying time trends. The percentage reduction was greatest in younger children and greater for the category of killed or seriously injured casualties than for minor injuries. There was no evidence of casualty migration to areas adjacent to 20 mph zones, where casualties also fell slightly by an average of 8.0% (4.4% to 11.5%). Conclusions 20 mph zones are effective measures for reducing road injuries and deaths.

摘要

目的

量化在伦敦引入每小时20英里(32公里)的交通限速区对道路碰撞、伤害及死亡情况的影响。

设计

基于对1986 - 2006年按地理编码的警方道路伤亡数据进行分析的观察性研究。采用条件固定效应泊松模型,对119029个至少发生过一起伤亡事故的道路路段内道路伤害计数的纵向变化进行分析。针对交通伤亡人数的潜在下降趋势,对引入每小时20英里限速区对这些区域及相邻区域伤亡情况的影响估计进行了调整。

地点

伦敦。

主要观察指标

道路碰撞造成的所有伤亡情况;死亡及重伤(KSI)情况。

结果

在对潜在时间趋势进行调整后,引入每小时20英里限速区与道路伤亡人数减少41.9%(95%置信区间为36.0%至47.8%)相关。年龄较小的儿童伤亡人数减少百分比最大,死亡或重伤类别的伤亡人数减少幅度大于轻伤。没有证据表明伤亡事故转移至每小时20英里限速区的相邻区域,这些相邻区域的伤亡人数也平均略有下降,降幅为8.0%(4.4%至11.5%)。结论:每小时20英里限速区是减少道路伤害和死亡的有效措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e97/4787438/138806e629cf/gruc652966.f2_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e97/4787438/6ccc8a227f5c/gruc652966.f1_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e97/4787438/138806e629cf/gruc652966.f2_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e97/4787438/6ccc8a227f5c/gruc652966.f1_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e97/4787438/138806e629cf/gruc652966.f2_default.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of 20 mph traffic speed zones on road injuries in London, 1986-2006: controlled interrupted time series analysis.1986 - 2006年伦敦每小时20英里交通限速区对道路伤害的影响:对照中断时间序列分析
BMJ. 2009 Dec 10;339:b4469. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b4469.
2
The impact of 20 mph traffic speed zones on inequalities in road casualties in London.20 英里限速区对伦敦道路伤亡不平等的影响。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011 Oct;65(10):921-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.2010.112193. Epub 2010 Nov 15.
3
Effect of 20 mph speed limits on traffic injuries in Edinburgh, UK: a natural experiment and modelling study.英国爱丁堡 20 英里限速对交通伤害的影响:自然实验和建模研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2024 Jun 10;78(7):437-443. doi: 10.1136/jech-2023-221612.
4
Traffic speed zones and road injuries.交通限速区与道路伤害
BMJ. 2009 Dec 10;339:b4743. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b4743.
5
Detailed analysis of pedestrian casualty collisions in Victoria, Australia.澳大利亚维多利亚州行人伤亡碰撞事故的详细分析。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15 Suppl 1:S197-205. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.935356.
6
An evaluation of police reporting of road casualties.警方对道路伤亡情况报告的评估。
Inj Prev. 2009 Feb;15(1):13-8. doi: 10.1136/ip.2008.018630.
7
Cost benefit analysis of 20 mph zones in London.伦敦 20 英里限速区的成本效益分析。
Inj Prev. 2013 Jun;19(3):211-3. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040347. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
8
Effects of city-wide 20 mph (30km/hour) speed limits on road injuries in Bristol, UK.英国布里斯托全市 20 英里/小时(30 公里/小时)限速对道路伤害的影响。
Inj Prev. 2020 Feb;26(1):85-88. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043305. Epub 2019 Jul 13.
9
Traffic safety effects of new speed limits in Sweden.瑞典新限速对交通安全的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 May;114:34-39. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
10
Effectiveness of speed cameras in preventing road traffic collisions and related casualties: systematic review.测速摄像头在预防道路交通碰撞及相关伤亡方面的有效性:系统评价
BMJ. 2005 Feb 12;330(7487):331-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38324.646574.AE. Epub 2005 Jan 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Environmental and health effects of the Barcelona superblocks.巴塞罗那超级街区的环境与健康影响
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 17;25(1):634. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21835-z.
2
Effect of 20 mph speed limits on traffic injuries in Edinburgh, UK: a natural experiment and modelling study.英国爱丁堡 20 英里限速对交通伤害的影响:自然实验和建模研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2024 Jun 10;78(7):437-443. doi: 10.1136/jech-2023-221612.
3
Effectiveness of road safety interventions: An evidence and gap map.道路安全干预措施的有效性:证据与差距图。

本文引用的文献

1
Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030.2002年至2030年全球死亡率及疾病负担预测。
PLoS Med. 2006 Nov;3(11):e442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030442.
2
Empirical Bayes before-after safety studies: lessons learned from two decades of experience and future directions.经验贝叶斯前后对照安全性研究:二十年经验教训与未来方向
Accid Anal Prev. 2007 May;39(3):546-55. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.09.009. Epub 2006 Nov 1.
3
Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of population health data.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 3;20(1):e1367. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1367. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Perceived Safety Influencing Active Travel to School-A Built Environment Perspective.感知安全对积极上学出行的影响——基于建成环境的视角。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 6;20(2):1026. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021026.
5
Evaluating the policy of closing bars and restaurants in Cataluña and its effects on mobility and COVID19 incidence.评估加泰罗尼亚关闭酒吧和餐馆的政策及其对流动性和 COVID19 发病率的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 7;12(1):9132. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11531-y.
6
Pedestrian injuries in collisions with pedal cycles in the context of increased active travel: Trends in England, 2005-2015.在积极出行增加的背景下,行人与踏板自行车碰撞事故中的伤害情况:2005 - 2015年英格兰的趋势
J Transp Health. 2022 Mar;24:101340. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2022.101340.
7
Impact of night travel ban on road traffic crashes and fatalities in Zambia: an interrupted time series analysis.夜间旅行禁令对赞比亚道路交通碰撞事故和死亡人数的影响:一项中断时间序列分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Dec;6(12). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005481.
8
New urban models for more sustainable, liveable and healthier cities post covid19; reducing air pollution, noise and heat island effects and increasing green space and physical activity.新冠疫情后更可持续、宜居和健康城市的新城市模式;减少空气污染、噪音和热岛效应,增加绿色空间和身体活动。
Environ Int. 2021 Dec;157:106850. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106850. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
9
Impacts of COVID-19 on the usage of public bicycle share in London.新冠疫情对伦敦公共自行车共享使用情况的影响。
Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. 2021 Aug;150:140-155. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2021.06.010. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
10
The Impact of the Social Distancing Policy on COVID-19 Incidence Cases and Deaths in Iran from February 2020 to January 2021: Insights from an Interrupted Time Series Analysis.2020 年 2 月至 2021 年 1 月伊朗实施社交隔离政策对 COVID-19 发病和死亡病例的影响:来自中断时间序列分析的见解。
Yale J Biol Med. 2021 Mar 31;94(1):13-21. eCollection 2021 Mar.
《2001年全球和区域疾病负担及风险因素:对人群健康数据的系统分析》
Lancet. 2006 May 27;367(9524):1747-57. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68770-9.
4
Driving speed and the risk of road crashes: a review.驾驶速度与道路交通事故风险:综述
Accid Anal Prev. 2006 Mar;38(2):215-24. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2005.07.004. Epub 2005 Oct 27.
5
The millennium development goals and road traffic injuries: exploring the linkages in South Asia.千年发展目标与道路交通伤害:探索南亚地区的联系
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2004 Dec;14(12):742-5.
6
Inequality and road-traffic injuries: call for action.不平等与道路交通伤害:呼吁采取行动。
Lancet. 2003 Dec 20;362(9401):2034-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15145-8.
7
Traffic calming for the prevention of road traffic injuries: systematic review and meta-analysis.交通稳静化预防道路交通伤害:系统评价与荟萃分析
Inj Prev. 2003 Sep;9(3):200-4. doi: 10.1136/ip.9.3.200.
8
Area-wide traffic calming for preventing traffic related injuries.区域交通稳静化以预防交通相关伤害。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2003(1):CD003110. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003110.
9
Area-wide urban traffic calming schemes: a meta-analysis of safety effects.区域范围的城市交通稳静化方案:安全效果的荟萃分析
Accid Anal Prev. 2001 May;33(3):327-36. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(00)00046-4.