• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

世界卫生组织两项针对 COVID-19 的研发倡议促进公平创新的适用性:获取 COVID-19 工具加速器和 COVID-19 技术获取池。

Suitability of two WHO research and development initiatives for COVID-19 to promote equitable innovation: the Access to COVID-19 Tools Accelerator and COVID-19 Technology Access Pool.

作者信息

da Silva Luiza Pinheiro Alves, Rapini Márcia Siqueira

机构信息

Federal University of Minas Gerais Belo Horizonte Brazil Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2022 Nov 8;46:e194. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2022.194. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.26633/RPSP.2022.194
PMID:36382255
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9642827/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the World Health Organization's (WHO's) contribution to promotion of access to innovative technologies by assessing its initiatives on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) research, development, and innovation.

METHODS

A document search was done for previous criteria used by WHO working groups to evaluate innovation and access merits. Two sets of criteria were identified. One set was used to assess the suitability of existing mechanisms to coordinate research, development, and innovation and pool funds globally. The second set was used to measure success in implementing demonstration projects and consider the extent of innovative components being implemented by them. These criteria were applied to the COVID-19 Technology Access Pool (C-TAP) and Access to COVID-19 Tools Accelerator (ACT-A) initiatives. Scores were classified as: meets the criteria (2); partially meets the criteria (1); does not meet the criteria (0).

RESULTS

Both initiatives met all the first set of criteria. C-TAP, an initiative based on a patent pool and other open knowledge approaches, best met the second set of criteria, scoring 7 out of 12 points. ACT-A, based on pooled funds, advanced purchase agreements, and voluntary contributions, met none of the second set of criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Equitable access to health technologies has been a recurring problem in recent pandemics and initiatives were proposed to prevent it. However, even though COVID-19 has been the greatest health crisis in the 21st century, market dynamics still prevailed. Income disparities between countries and lack of support for solidarity and a global health approach only aggravated the negative health and economic impacts.

摘要

目的

通过评估世界卫生组织(WHO)在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)研究、开发和创新方面的举措,分析其对促进获取创新技术的贡献。

方法

对WHO工作组先前用于评估创新和获取价值的标准进行文献检索。确定了两套标准。一套用于评估现有机制在全球范围内协调研究、开发和创新以及筹集资金的适用性。另一套用于衡量示范项目实施的成功程度,并考虑其中创新部分的实施程度。这些标准应用于COVID-19技术获取池(C-TAP)和COVID-19工具加速获取(ACT-A)倡议。分数分为:符合标准(2分);部分符合标准(1分);不符合标准(0分)。

结果

两项倡议均符合第一套标准的所有要求。C-TAP倡议基于专利池和其他开放知识方法,最符合第二套标准,在12分中得7分。基于筹集资金、预购协议和自愿捐款的ACT-A倡议不符合第二套标准中的任何一项。

结论

在近期的大流行中,公平获取卫生技术一直是一个反复出现的问题,为此提出了一些倡议来预防这一问题。然而,尽管COVID-19是21世纪最大的健康危机,但市场动态仍然占主导地位。国家之间的收入差距以及对团结和全球卫生方法缺乏支持,只会加剧负面的健康和经济影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/154d/9642827/f8baea1818ae/rpsp-46-e194_Figure2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/154d/9642827/b3ea46a18871/rpsp-46-e194_Figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/154d/9642827/f8baea1818ae/rpsp-46-e194_Figure2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/154d/9642827/b3ea46a18871/rpsp-46-e194_Figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/154d/9642827/f8baea1818ae/rpsp-46-e194_Figure2.jpg

相似文献

1
Suitability of two WHO research and development initiatives for COVID-19 to promote equitable innovation: the Access to COVID-19 Tools Accelerator and COVID-19 Technology Access Pool.世界卫生组织两项针对 COVID-19 的研发倡议促进公平创新的适用性:获取 COVID-19 工具加速器和 COVID-19 技术获取池。
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2022 Nov 8;46:e194. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2022.194. eCollection 2022.
2
Analysis of the institutional landscape and proliferation of proposals for global vaccine equity for COVID-19: too many cooks or too many recipes?对2019冠状病毒病全球疫苗公平分配的制度格局及相关提议激增情况的分析:是厨子太多还是菜谱太多?
J Med Ethics. 2023 Aug;49(8):583-590. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107684. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
3
Reserving coronavirus disease 2019 vaccines for global access: cross sectional analysis.预留 2019 冠状病毒病疫苗以实现全球可及:横断面分析。
BMJ. 2020 Dec 15;371:m4750. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4750.
4
Tuberculosis结核病
5
Pandemic preparedness and response: beyond the Access to COVID-19 Tools Accelerator.大流行防范与应对:超越新冠工具获取加速器。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Jan;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010615.
6
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
7
University patenting and licensing practices in the United Kingdom during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情大流行第一年英国的大学专利申请与许可实践。
Glob Public Health. 2022 May;17(5):641-651. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2022.2049842. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
8
Strengthening the WHO in the pandemic era by removing a persistent structural defect in financing.在大流行时代加强世界卫生组织,消除其融资结构中持续存在的缺陷。
Global Health. 2021 Dec 15;17(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00780-7.
9
Global Reach of an Online COVID-19 Course in Multiple Languages on OpenWHO in the First Quarter of 2020: Analysis of Platform Use Data.2020年第一季度多语言在线COVID-19课程在世界卫生组织开放平台上的全球传播范围:平台使用数据分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 27;22(4):e19076. doi: 10.2196/19076.
10
European collaborations on medicine and vaccine procurement.欧洲在医学和疫苗采购方面的合作。
Bull World Health Organ. 2021 Oct 1;99(10):715-721. doi: 10.2471/BLT.21.285761. Epub 2021 Aug 20.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Implementing Advanced Strategies to Improve Immunization Coverage in the Elogbele Health Area.实施先进策略以提高埃洛贝莱健康区免疫接种覆盖率的效果
Cureus. 2025 Jun 4;17(6):e85346. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85346. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
We Cannot Win the Access to Medicines Struggle Using the Same Thinking That Causes the Chronic Access Crisis.我们不能用导致慢性获取危机的思维方式来赢得药品获取斗争。
Health Hum Rights. 2021 Jun;23(1):119-127.
2
A beautiful idea: how COVAX has fallen short.一个美好的设想:新冠疫苗全球获取机制(COVAX)为何未达预期。
Lancet. 2021 Jun 19;397(10292):2322-2325. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01367-2.
3
Access to COVID-19 vaccines: looking beyond COVAX.获得新冠疫苗:超越新冠疫苗全球获取机制(COVAX)的视角
Lancet. 2021 Mar 13;397(10278):941. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00617-6.
4
Challenges in ensuring global access to COVID-19 vaccines: production, affordability, allocation, and deployment.确保全球公平获得 COVID-19 疫苗面临的挑战:生产、可负担性、分配和部署。
Lancet. 2021 Mar 13;397(10278):1023-1034. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00306-8. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
5
The financial sustainability of the World Health Organization and the political economy of global health governance: a review of funding proposals.世界卫生组织的财务可持续性与全球卫生治理的政治经济学:对供资提案的审查。
Global Health. 2018 Nov 29;14(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12992-018-0436-8.