• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学生物化学与遗传学课程中学生的表现:基于校园授课与基于Zoom授课的比较

Student performance in medical biochemistry and genetics: comparing campus-based versus zoom-based lecture delivery.

作者信息

Faner Martha A, Ritchie Raquel P, Ruger Katherine M, Waarala Kirsten L, Wilkins Carol A

机构信息

College of Osteopathic Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, Michigan State University, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.

College of Osteopathic Medicine, Michigan State University, Macomb University Center, Clinton Twp, MI, 48038, USA.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2022 Nov 16;22(1):798. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03873-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-022-03873-y
PMID:36384548
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9668392/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We appraised the effectiveness of online (Zoom) delivery versus live campus-based delivery of lectures in biochemistry and genetics courses and assessed the security of remote versus campus-administered exams.

METHODS

Participants were 601 students entering Michigan State University College of Osteopathic Medicine in 2019 or 2020. The former cohort completed courses and exams on campus, while the latter completed courses online due to the COVID-19 pandemic. For the biochemistry and genetics courses, the same lecturers delivered the same content and used identical exam questions for assessments in 2019 and 2020. The investigators compared percent correct for each question in 2019 and 2020.

RESULTS

This study found 84 of 126 (67%) of the questions yielded little difference (3% or less in % correct) between live delivery and Zoom delivery. For questions whose % correct index differed by 4% or more, Zoom delivery yielded a better performance for 16 questions (13%), while 19 questions (15%) showed live lectures performed better. Seven of the questions (6%) had an identical mode of delivery in 2019 and 2020 (e.g., self-study exercise). These served as "control questions" for which equivalent student performance was expected. The 126 questions analyzed spanned a wide range in the % correct index, from 60% correct to > 90% correct.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that Zoom and on-campus delivery of the content in biochemistry and genetics yielded similar achievement of course objectives. The high concordance, between 2019 and 2020, of the % correct for individual questions also speaks to exam security including online proctoring.

摘要

背景

我们评估了在生物化学和遗传学课程中,通过在线(Zoom)授课与在校园现场授课的效果,并评估了远程考试与校园管理考试的安全性。

方法

参与者为2019年或2020年进入密歇根州立大学整骨医学院的601名学生。前一组在校园内完成课程和考试,而后一组由于新冠疫情在网上完成课程。对于生物化学和遗传学课程,相同的讲师在2019年和2020年讲授相同的内容并使用相同的考试题目进行评估。研究人员比较了2019年和2020年每个问题的正确百分比。

结果

本研究发现,126个问题中有84个(67%)在现场授课和Zoom授课之间差异不大(正确百分比相差3%或更少)。对于正确百分比指数相差4%或更多的问题,Zoom授课在16个问题(13%)上表现更好,而19个问题(15%)显示现场授课表现更好。其中7个问题(6%)在2019年和2020年的授课方式相同(例如自学练习)。这些作为“对照问题”,预期学生表现相当。所分析的126个问题的正确百分比指数范围很广,从60%正确到>90%正确。

结论

结果表明,在生物化学和遗传学中,通过Zoom和在校园授课在实现课程目标方面取得了相似的成绩。2019年和2020年单个问题正确百分比的高度一致性也说明了包括在线监考在内的考试安全性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8ad/9670401/83c1b40e235c/12909_2022_3873_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8ad/9670401/598df0ecb634/12909_2022_3873_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8ad/9670401/242c53ccea3b/12909_2022_3873_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8ad/9670401/83c1b40e235c/12909_2022_3873_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8ad/9670401/598df0ecb634/12909_2022_3873_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8ad/9670401/242c53ccea3b/12909_2022_3873_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8ad/9670401/83c1b40e235c/12909_2022_3873_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Student performance in medical biochemistry and genetics: comparing campus-based versus zoom-based lecture delivery.医学生物化学与遗传学课程中学生的表现:基于校园授课与基于Zoom授课的比较
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Nov 16;22(1):798. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03873-y.
2
Paramedic student performance: comparison of online with on-campus lecture delivery methods.护理专业学生的表现:在线授课与校内授课方式的比较。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2006 Jul-Aug;21(4):261-7. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00003800.
3
Students' preferences for returning to colleges and universities during the COVID-19 pandemic: A discrete choice experiment.新冠疫情期间学生对重返高校的偏好:一项离散选择实验
Socioecon Plann Sci. 2022 Aug;82:101266. doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2022.101266. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
4
The Association Between Distance Learning, Stress Level, and Perceived Quality of Education in Medical Students After Transitioning to a Fully Online Platform.向完全在线平台过渡后,医学生的远程学习、压力水平与感知教育质量之间的关联
Cureus. 2022 Apr 12;14(4):e24071. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24071. eCollection 2022 Apr.
5
Effect of remote online exam delivery on student experience and performance in applied knowledge tests.远程在线考试对应用知识测试中学生体验和表现的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Feb 2;21(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02521-1.
6
Converting a formerly in-person biochemistry course based undergraduate research experience to online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic.将原本以面对面形式进行的生物化学课程本科研究经验,在 COVID-19 大流行期间转换为在线教学。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2022 Jan;50(1):104-113. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21597. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
7
Online learning during COVID-19 produced equivalent or better student course performance as compared with pre-pandemic: empirical evidence from a school-wide comparative study.新冠疫情期间的在线学习与疫情前相比产生了相当或更好的学生课程表现:一项全校范围比较研究的实证证据。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Sep 16;21(1):495. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02909-z.
8
Adaptation of an anatomy graduate course in ultrasound imaging from in-person to live, remote instruction during the Covid-19 pandemic.在新冠疫情期间,将一门人体解剖学研究生课程的超声成像部分从面授改为远程实时教学。
Anat Sci Educ. 2022 May;15(3):493-507. doi: 10.1002/ase.2177. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
9
Disadvantaged Students Utilize School Campus and Its Resources More Than Non-disadvantaged Students.弱势学生比非弱势学生更多地利用校园及其资源。
Cureus. 2023 Sep 28;15(9):e46128. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46128. eCollection 2023 Sep.
10
Team-based learning versus traditional didactic lectures in teaching clinical biochemistry at King Abdulaziz University; learning outcomes and student satisfaction.团队学习与传统讲授法在阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学临床生物化学教学中的比较;学习成果和学生满意度。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2021 Jul;49(4):546-559. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21501. Epub 2021 Mar 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Pre-clinical remote undergraduate medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey study.COVID-19 大流行期间的临床前远程本科医学教育:一项调查研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02445-2.
2
Efforts to cope with CBME in COVID-19 era to teach biochemistry in medical college.在新冠疫情时代应对基于能力的医学教育以在医学院教授生物化学的努力。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2020 Nov;48(6):670-674. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21469. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
3
The COVID-19 Pandemic as an Imperative to Advance Medical Student Assessment: Three Areas for Change.
COVID-19 大流行对推进医学生评估的必要性:三个变革领域。
Acad Med. 2021 Feb 1;96(2):182-185. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003764.
4
Learning During and From a Crisis: The Student-Led Development of a COVID-19 Curriculum.在危机中学习:学生主导的 COVID-19 课程开发。
Acad Med. 2021 Mar 1;96(3):399-401. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003755.
5
Creating a "Quarantine Curriculum" to Enhance Teaching and Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic.创建“隔离课程”以加强新冠疫情期间的教学与学习。
Acad Med. 2020 Aug;95(8):1125-1126. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003424.
6
The Role of Medical Student Government in Responding to COVID-19.医学生政府在应对 COVID-19 中的作用。
Acad Med. 2021 Jan 1;96(1):62-67. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003542.
7
Innovation in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis.应对 COVID-19 大流行危机的创新。
Acad Med. 2020 Aug;95(8):1140-1142. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003402.
8
The Inevitable Reimagining of Medical Education.医学教育的必然重塑
JAMA. 2020 Mar 24;323(12):1127-1128. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1227.
9
Barriers and solutions to online learning in medical education - an integrative review.医学教育中在线学习的障碍及解决方案——综合述评。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Jun 7;18(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1240-0.
10
Introduction of an anatomy eBook enhances assessment outcomes.一本解剖学电子书的引入提高了评估结果。
Med Educ. 2015 May;49(5):522-3. doi: 10.1111/medu.12708.