Suppr超能文献

刺激脉冲幅度和时间对触发电脉冲感知的影响。

The effect of prepulse amplitude and timing on the perception of an electrotactile pulse.

机构信息

School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.

School of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Apr;86(3):1038-1047. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02597-x. Epub 2022 Nov 16.

Abstract

The perceived intensity of an intense stimulus as well as the startle reflex it elicits can both be reduced when preceded by a weak stimulus (prepulse). Both phenomena are used to characterise the processes of sensory gating in clinical and non-clinical populations. The latter phenomenon, startle prepulse inhibition (PPI), is conceptualised as a measure of pre-attentive sensorimotor gating due to its observation at short latencies. In contrast, the former, prepulse inhibition of perceived stimulus intensity (PPIPSI), is believed to involve higher-order cognitive processes (e.g., attention), which require longer latencies. Although conceptually distinct, PPIPSI is often studied using parameters that elicit maximal PPI, likely limiting what we can learn about sensory gating's influence on conscious perception. Here, we tested an array of stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs; 0-602 ms) and prepulse intensities (0-3× perceptual threshold) to determine the time course and sensitivity to the intensity of electrotactile PPIPSI. Participants were required to compare an 'unpleasant but not painful' electric pulse to their left wrist that was presented alone with the same stimulus preceded by an electric prepulse, and report which pulse stimulus felt more intense. Using a 2× perceptual threshold prepulse, PPIPSI emerged as significant at SOAs from 162 to 602 ms. We conclude that evidence of electrotactile PPIPSI at SOAs of 162 ms or longer is consistent with gating of perception requiring higher-level processes, not measured by startle PPI. The possible role of attentional processes, stimuli intensity, modality-specific differences, and methods of investigating PPIPSI further are discussed.

摘要

当强刺激之前出现弱刺激(预备刺激)时,人们对强刺激的感知强度以及由此引发的惊跳反射都会减弱。这两种现象都被用于描述临床和非临床人群中的感觉门控过程。后一种现象,即惊跳预备抑制(PPI),由于其在短潜伏期内被观察到,被概念化为非注意感觉运动门控的度量。相比之下,前一种现象,即感知刺激强度的预备抑制(PPIPSI),被认为涉及到更高阶的认知过程(例如注意力),这需要更长的潜伏期。尽管在概念上有所区别,但 PPIPSI 通常使用引发最大 PPI 的参数进行研究,这可能限制了我们对感觉门控对意识感知影响的了解。在这里,我们测试了一系列刺激起始潜伏期(SOA;0-602 毫秒)和预备刺激强度(0-3×感知阈值),以确定电触觉 PPIPSI 的时间过程和对强度的敏感性。要求参与者将一个“不愉快但不痛苦”的电脉冲与他们左手腕进行比较,该脉冲单独呈现,同时呈现相同的刺激,该刺激之前有一个电预备脉冲,并报告哪个脉冲刺激感觉更强烈。使用 2×感知阈值的预备刺激,在 162 到 602 毫秒的 SOA 上出现了显著的 PPIPSI。我们得出结论,在 162 毫秒或更长的 SOA 上出现电触觉 PPIPSI 的证据与需要更高阶过程的感知门控一致,而不是由惊跳 PPI 测量的。进一步讨论了注意力过程、刺激强度、模态特异性差异以及研究 PPIPSI 的方法的可能作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b1c/11062989/ca2c8edc7ce8/13414_2022_2597_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验