School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
Arch Sex Behav. 2023 Apr;52(3):1239-1254. doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02465-7. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
Research has found that sexual orientation beliefs predict heterosexuals' attitudes toward sexual minorities, and important sexual identity outcomes in sexual minority populations. To this point, no studies have systematically examined how sexual orientation beliefs may be associated with sexual identity self-labeling among sexual minority individuals. The present study examined this question in a sample of 1840 same-gender attracted individuals recruited for a cross-sectional online survey. Beliefs in the naturalness and discreteness of sexual orientation categories were highest in gay/lesbian individuals, intermediate in bisexual people, and lower in queer and pansexual individuals. Beliefs in the importance of sexual orientation were highest in gay/lesbian and queer identified individuals and lower in bisexual people. Within-group analysis demonstrated that gay/lesbian individuals who reported more exclusive same-gender attraction reported higher naturalness, discreteness, and importance beliefs than those with less-exclusive same-gender attraction. However, naturalness, discreteness, and importance beliefs were not associated with sexual attraction patterns in bisexual individuals. Finally, among predominately same-gender attracted populations, the adoption of a queer identity (over a gay/lesbian identity) was predicted by lower naturalness and discreteness beliefs, and increased perceived importance in females. Among non-monosexual populations, adoption of a pansexual identity over a bisexual identity was predicted by lower naturalness beliefs in females, but not predicted by sexual orientation beliefs in males. Collectively, these findings suggest that sexual orientation beliefs differ between sexual identity groups and may partly explain the adoption of particular sexual identity labels among contemporary sexual minority populations.
研究发现,性取向信念预测了异性恋者对性少数群体的态度,以及性少数群体中的重要性身份结果。到目前为止,还没有研究系统地考察性取向信念如何与性少数个体的性身份自我认同相关。本研究在一项针对 1840 名同性吸引个体的横断面在线调查中检验了这个问题。在同性恋/女同性恋个体中,性取向类别自然性和离散性的信念最高,在双性恋个体中处于中间水平,而在酷儿和泛性恋个体中则较低。性取向重要性的信念在同性恋/女同性恋和酷儿认同个体中最高,在双性恋个体中较低。组内分析表明,报告更排他性同性吸引的同性恋/女同性恋个体比那些同性吸引力较弱的个体具有更高的自然性、离散性和重要性信念。然而,自然性、离散性和重要性信念与双性恋个体的性吸引模式无关。最后,在主要是同性吸引的人群中,女性的性身份认同(同性恋/女同性恋认同)比男性更倾向于认同酷儿认同,这与较低的自然性和离散性信念以及更高的感知重要性有关。在非单性恋人群中,女性的自然性信念较低,与双性恋认同相比,泛性恋认同更倾向于认同泛性恋认同,而男性的性取向信念则没有预测作用。总的来说,这些发现表明,性取向信念在不同的性身份群体中存在差异,并且可能部分解释了当代性少数群体中特定性身份标签的采用。