Alarfaj Sumaiah J, Alzahrani Abdullah, Alotaibi Anfal, Almutairi Malak, Hakami Mashael, Alhomaid Njood, Alharthi Noori, Korayem Ghazwa B, Alghamdi Abdullah
Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Pharmacy, Security Forces Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Saudi Pharm J. 2022 Oct;30(10):1448-1453. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2022.07.005. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
The introduction of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) to treat the hepatitis C virus (HCV) overcame many drawbacks of interferon-based therapy. DAA achieved sustained viral response (SVR) rates above 90% and overcame many drawbacks of pegylated interferon regimens.The HCV genotype (GT) distribution varies by geographical area, with GT-4 being most prevalent in the Middle East region, including Saudi Arabia. Yet, the real-world evidence about using DAAs in the Saudi population is limited.Thus, the aim of this study to investigate the effectiveness and safety of DAAs in Saudi patients with HCV infection.
A retrospective cohort study included patients treated with DAAs from 2015 to 2017 at a tertiary care hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. All patients with HCV treated with either ledipasvir plus sofosbuvir (LDS/SOF) ± ribavarin (RBV) or ombitasvir-paritaprevir-ritonavir (OBV/PTV/r) ± dasabuvir (DSV) ± RBV were included. Using a per-protocol analysis, the effectiveness outcome was the end-of-treatment response (EOTr) and Sustained virologic reponce12 weeks after competing the regimen (SVR12). The secondary safety outcome was the adverse event related to the therapy reported by the patients.
A total of 97 patients were included; with the majority infected with GT-4 (64 %), followed by GT-1 (18 %), in addition to 8 % having a mixed GT (1 + 4). The EOTr and SVR12 rates were 98 % and 96 %, respectively. SVR12 was 94.4 % within the LDS/SOF ± RBV group and 97.7 % within the OBV/PTV/r ± DSV ± RBV group. Only 4 % had a response failure due to relapse or breakthrough, and all were infected with mixed GT1 + 4. Medications were well tolerated with minimal side effects, including vomiting, nausea, and weakness.
DAAs regimens are associated with high rates of SVR12 and are well tolerated with a good safety profile in Saudi HCV-infected patients.
直接抗病毒药物(DAA)的引入用于治疗丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)克服了基于干扰素疗法的许多缺点。DAA实现了超过90%的持续病毒学应答(SVR)率,并克服了聚乙二醇化干扰素方案的许多缺点。HCV基因型(GT)分布因地理区域而异,GT-4在包括沙特阿拉伯在内的中东地区最为普遍。然而,关于在沙特人群中使用DAA的真实世界证据有限。因此,本研究的目的是调查DAA在沙特HCV感染患者中的有效性和安全性。
一项回顾性队列研究纳入了2015年至2017年在沙特阿拉伯利雅得一家三级护理医院接受DAA治疗的患者。所有接受来迪派韦加索磷布韦(LDS/SOF)±利巴韦林(RBV)或奥比他韦-帕利哌韦-利托那韦(OBV/PTV/r)±达沙布韦(DSV)±RBV治疗的HCV患者均被纳入。采用符合方案分析,有效性结局为治疗结束时的应答(EOTr)和完成治疗方案后12周的持续病毒学应答(SVR12)。次要安全性结局为患者报告的与治疗相关的不良事件。
共纳入97例患者;大多数感染GT-4(64%),其次是GT-1(18%),此外8%为混合GT(1+4)。EOTr和SVR12率分别为98%和96%。LDS/SOF±RBV组的SVR12为94.4%,OBV/PTV/r±DSV±RBV组的SVR12为97.7%。仅4%因复发或突破而应答失败,且均感染混合GT1+4。药物耐受性良好,副作用最小,包括呕吐、恶心和虚弱。
DAA方案与高SVR12率相关,在沙特HCV感染患者中耐受性良好且安全性良好。