Mitgutsch Valentina, Stummer Harald
Institute for Management and Economics in Healthcare, UMIT Tirol-University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Eduard-Wallnoefer-Zentrum 1, A-6060 Hall in Tirol, Austria.
Institute for Health Management, IMC University of Applied Sciences Krems, Piaristengasse 1, A-3500 Krems an der Donau, Austria.
Heliyon. 2022 Nov 9;8(11):e11552. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11552. eCollection 2022 Nov.
The COVID-19 outbreak has changed nearly all societal domains, including medical rehabilitation. Social distancing measures impacted patients as well as health professionals during the rehabilitation process. Enhancing patient participation should not be forgotten during exceptional situations, as restrictive measures are related to the self-determination of patients.
In this exploratory trend study, we aimed to examine the association between COVID-19 restrictions with patients' motivation, their perception of the patient-provider-relationship, their participation in the rehabilitation process and their current state of health at the beginning of their rehabilitation.
Adopting an exploratory approach, we compared data from a convenience sample of two different groups of patients, who stayed at a cardiac rehabilitation clinic at two different time periods: before the COVID-19 lockdown of rehabilitation clinics (n = 128) and after reopening during the COVID-19 period (n = 137). We used questionnaires on motivation for rehabilitation, patient-provider-relationship, patient activation and perceived state of health. We conducted t-tests and regression analysis to determine whether there were differences by gender, age, heart failure status, preferred form of decision-making (shared/not-shared) and time of rehabilitation (before/during COVID-19) related to the outcome variables.
Participants evaluated the quality of the patient-provider-relationship in a better way after the reopening of the rehabilitation clinics during the COVID-19 period (p < 0.05), their motivation, participation in the rehabilitation process and their current state of health at the beginning of their rehabilitation was comparable to the group before the COVID-19 lockdown of rehabilitation clinics. Differences in scepticism concerning the treatment and the quality of the patient-provider-relationship were related (p < 0.05) to age and the preferred form of decision-making. Differences in active participation were related (p < 0.05) to sex and differences in the perceived state of health (p < 0.05) to a heart failure diagnosis.
Treatment providers could use the time patients spend in isolation after arrival to prepare them for virtual goal-setting conversations to enhance patient participation in exceptional situations.
新冠疫情的爆发改变了几乎所有社会领域,包括医学康复。社交距离措施在康复过程中对患者和医疗专业人员都产生了影响。在特殊情况下,不应忘记提高患者参与度,因为限制措施与患者的自决权相关。
在这项探索性趋势研究中,我们旨在研究新冠疫情限制措施与患者的动机、他们对医患关系的认知、他们在康复开始时对康复过程的参与度以及他们当前的健康状况之间的关联。
我们采用探索性方法,比较了两组不同患者的便利样本数据,这两组患者在两个不同时间段入住心脏康复诊所:新冠疫情封锁康复诊所之前(n = 128)和新冠疫情期间重新开放之后(n = 137)。我们使用了关于康复动机、医患关系、患者积极性和健康感知状态的问卷。我们进行了t检验和回归分析,以确定在性别、年龄、心力衰竭状态、首选决策形式(共同/非共同)以及康复时间(新冠疫情之前/期间)方面,与结果变量是否存在差异。
在新冠疫情期间康复诊所重新开放后,参与者对医患关系质量的评价更好(p < 0.05),他们在康复开始时的动机、对康复过程的参与度以及当前的健康状况与新冠疫情封锁康复诊所之前的组相当。对治疗的怀疑态度和医患关系质量的差异与年龄和首选决策形式有关(p < 0.05)。积极参与的差异与性别有关(p < 0.05),健康感知状态的差异与心力衰竭诊断有关(p < 0.05)。
治疗提供者可以利用患者到达后隔离的时间,为他们准备虚拟目标设定对话,以提高特殊情况下患者的参与度。