Suppr超能文献

肝硬化患者早期食管鳞状细胞癌的内镜黏膜下隧道剥离术:一项倾向评分分析。

Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection for early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: A propensity score analysis.

作者信息

Zhu Lin-Lin, Liu Li-Xia, Wu Jun-Chao, Gan Tao, Yang Jin-Lin

机构信息

Department of General Practice, General Practice Medical Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China.

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China.

出版信息

World J Clin Cases. 2022 Nov 6;10(31):11325-11337. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i31.11325.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (EESCC) with cirrhosis is a relatively rare clinical phenomenon, the management of EESCC in cirrhotic patients continues to be a challenge.

AIM

To evaluate the feasibility, safety, efficacy and long-term survival outcomes of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection (ESTD) for treating EESCC in patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. We examined 590 EESCC patients who underwent ESTD between July 14, 2014, and May 26, 2021, from a large-scale tertiary hospital. After excluding 25 patients with unclear lesion areas or pathological results, the remaining 565 patients were matched at a ratio of 1:3 by using propensity score matching. A total of 25 EESCC patients with comorbid liver cirrhosis and 75 matched EESCC patients were ultimately included in the analysis. Parametric and nonparametric statistical methods were used to compare the differences between the two groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to create survival curves, and differences in survival curves were compared by the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Among 25 patients with liver cirrhosis and 75 matched noncirrhotic patients, there were no significant differences in intraoperative bleeding = 0.234) 30-d post-ESTD bleeding ( 0.099 disease-specific survival ( = 0.075), or recurrence-free survival ( = 0.8196) The mean hospitalization time and costs were significantly longer ( = 0.007) and higher ( = 0.023) in the cirrhosis group than in the noncirrhosis group. The overall survival rate was significantly lower in the cirrhosis group ( = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

ESTD is technically feasible, safe, and effective for patients with EESCC and liver cirrhosis. EESCC patients with A disease seem to be good candidates for ESTD.

摘要

背景

尽管早期食管鳞状细胞癌(EESCC)合并肝硬化是一种相对罕见的临床现象,但肝硬化患者的EESCC治疗仍然是一项挑战。

目的

评估内镜黏膜下隧道剥离术(ESTD)治疗肝硬化患者EESCC的可行性、安全性、有效性和长期生存结果。

方法

这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究。我们检查了2014年7月14日至2021年5月26日期间在一家大型三级医院接受ESTD的590例EESCC患者。排除25例病变区域或病理结果不明确的患者后,其余565例患者采用倾向评分匹配法按1:3的比例进行匹配。最终共纳入25例合并肝硬化的EESCC患者和75例匹配的EESCC患者进行分析。采用参数和非参数统计方法比较两组之间的差异。采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存曲线,并通过对数秩检验比较生存曲线的差异。

结果

在25例肝硬化患者和75例匹配的非肝硬化患者中,术中出血(P = 0.234)、ESTD术后30天出血(P = 0.099)、疾病特异性生存(P = 0.075)或无复发生存(P = 0.8196)方面均无显著差异。肝硬化组的平均住院时间和费用显著长于(P = 0.007)和高于(P = 0.023)非肝硬化组。肝硬化组的总生存率显著较低(P = 0.001)。

结论

ESTD对EESCC合并肝硬化患者在技术上是可行、安全且有效的。患有A疾病的EESCC患者似乎是ESTD的良好候选者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13ff/9649544/37b8eee56f82/WJCC-10-11325-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验