Suppr超能文献

多中心回顾性研究:内镜黏膜下隧道剥离术治疗大型胃小弯侧表浅肿瘤。

A multicenter retrospective study of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection for large lesser gastric curvature superficial neoplasms.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, China.

Department of Gastroenterology, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region People's Hospital, Yinchuan, 750021, China.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2019 Jun;33(6):1910-1919. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6471-y. Epub 2018 Sep 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection (ESTD) has been used for dissection of esophageal and gastric lesions. However, outcomes of ESTD for large lesions in the lesser gastric curvature had not been acknowledged because previous reports had the limitations of being single-center studies. We aimed to clarify the outcomes of ESTD for large lesser gastric curvature superficial neoplasms and provide our experience to accelerate its application.

METHODS

Between July 2014 and July 2016, 87 patients with early cancer in the lesser gastric curvature treated at six Chinese institutions were enrolled. Our primary outcome was dissection speed. Moreover, both efficacy and safety clinical data were collected and analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

All of the 87 patients were found to successfully undergo ESTD or ESD. Of these, 32 underwent ESTD and 55 underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The ESTD group had a higher dissection speed (18.0 mm/min vs. 7.8 mm/min, p < 0.01) and was associated with higher en bloc resection rate (100% vs. 87.3%, p = 0.035) and curative resection rate (100% vs. 85.5%, p = 0.024) compared with the ESD group. No perforation or muscular injury occurred in the ESTD group and its intraprocedural bleeding rate was lower (59.4% vs. 100%, p < 0.01) than that of the ESD group.

CONCLUSIONS

In this multicenter retrospective study, outcomes of ESTD were excellent with a higher dissection speed and radical curative rate compared with ESD.

摘要

背景与目的

内镜黏膜下隧道剥离术(ESTD)已用于食管和胃病变的剥离。然而,由于之前的报告存在单中心研究的局限性,因此尚未承认 ESTD 用于小弯侧大病变的结果。我们旨在阐明 ESTD 治疗小弯侧大浅表肿瘤的结果,并提供我们的经验以加速其应用。

方法

2014 年 7 月至 2016 年 7 月,我们纳入了六家中国机构治疗的小弯侧早期癌症的 87 例患者。我们的主要结局是剥离速度。此外,还回顾性地收集和分析了疗效和安全性的临床数据。

结果

87 例患者均成功接受 ESTD 或 ESD。其中 32 例行 ESTD,55 例行内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)。ESTD 组的剥离速度更高(18.0mm/min 比 7.8mm/min,p<0.01),整块切除率(100%比 87.3%,p=0.035)和治愈性切除率(100%比 85.5%,p=0.024)更高。ESTD 组无穿孔或肌肉损伤,术中出血率低于 ESD 组(59.4%比 100%,p<0.01)。

结论

在这项多中心回顾性研究中,ESTD 的结果非常出色,与 ESD 相比,其具有更高的剥离速度和根治性切除率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验