Department of Social Medicine, School of Public Health, Health Management College, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Department of Health Economy and Social Security, College of Humanities and Management, Guilin Medical University, Guilin, China.
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 26;10:988492. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.988492. eCollection 2022.
The huge loss of health insurance funds has been a topic of concern around the world. This study aims to explore the network of moral hazard activities and the attribution mechanisms that lead to the loss of medical insurance funds.
Data were derived from 314 typical cases of medical insurance moral hazards reported on Chinese government official websites. Social network analysis (SNA) was utilized to visualize the network structure of the moral hazard activities, and crisp-set qualitative comparative analysis (cs/QCA) was conducted to identify conditional configurations leading to funding loss in cases.
In the moral hazard activity network of medical insurance funds, more than 50% of immoral behaviors mainly occur in medical service institutions. Designated private hospitals (degree centrality = 33, closeness centrality = 0.851) and primary medical institutions (degree centrality = 30, closeness centrality = 0.857) are the main offenders that lead to the core problem of medical insurance fraud (degree centrality = 50, eigenvector centrality = 1). Designated public hospitals (degree centrality = 27, closeness centrality = 0.865) are main contributor to another important problem that illegal medical charges (degree centrality = 26, closeness centrality = 0.593). Non-medical insurance items swap medical insurance items (degree centrality = 28), forged medical records (degree centrality = 25), false hospitalization (degree centrality = 24), and overtreatment (degree centrality = 23) are important immoral nodes. According to the results of cs/QCA, low-economic pressure, low informatization, insufficient policy intervention, and organization such as public medical institutions, were the high-risk conditional configuration of opportunism; and high-economic pressure, insufficient policy intervention, and organizations, such as public medical institutions and high violation rates, were the high-risk conditional configuration of risky adventurism (solution coverage = 31.03%, solution consistency = 90%).
There are various types of moral hazard activities in medical insurance, which constitute a complex network of behaviors. Most moral hazard activities happen in medical institutions. Opportunism lack of regulatory technology and risky adventurism with economic pressure are two types causing high loss of funds, and the cases of high loss mainly occur before the government implemented intervention. The government should strengthen the regulatory intervention and improve the level of informatization for monitoring the moral hazard of medical insurance funds, especially in areas with low economic development and high incident rates, and focus on monitoring the behaviors of major medical services providers.
医疗保险基金的巨额损失一直是全球关注的话题。本研究旨在探讨医疗保险道德风险活动的网络以及导致医疗保险基金损失的归因机制。
数据来源于中国政府官方网站上报告的 314 例典型医疗保险道德风险案例。利用社会网络分析(SNA)可视化道德风险活动的网络结构,并采用明晰集定性比较分析(cs/QCA)识别导致案例资金损失的条件组态。
在医疗保险基金道德风险活动网络中,超过 50%的不道德行为主要发生在医疗机构。定点民营医院(度数中心度=33,接近中心度=0.851)和基层医疗机构(度数中心度=30,接近中心度=0.857)是导致医疗保险欺诈核心问题的主要责任人(度数中心度=50,特征向量中心度=1)。定点公立医院(度数中心度=27,接近中心度=0.865)是导致另一个重要问题——违规医疗收费的主要贡献者(度数中心度=26,接近中心度=0.593)。非医疗保险项目替代医疗保险项目(度数中心度=28)、伪造病历(度数中心度=25)、虚假住院(度数中心度=24)和过度治疗(度数中心度=23)是重要的不道德节点。根据 cs/QCA 的结果,低经济压力、低信息化程度、政策干预不足以及公立医疗机构等组织是机会主义的高风险条件配置;而高经济压力、政策干预不足以及公立医疗机构等组织和高违规率是冒险主义的高风险条件配置(解决方案覆盖率=31.03%,解决方案一致性=90%)。
医疗保险中存在多种类型的道德风险活动,构成了一个复杂的行为网络。大多数道德风险活动发生在医疗机构。缺乏监管技术的机会主义和有经济压力的冒险主义是导致资金大量流失的两种类型,高损失案例主要发生在政府实施干预之前。政府应加强监管干预,提高医疗保险道德风险监测的信息化水平,特别是在经济发展水平低、违规率高的地区,重点监测主要医疗服务提供者的行为。