• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

沙特医疗保健系统中的欺诈与滥用:三角分析。

Fraud and Abuse in the Saudi Healthcare System: A Triangulation Analysis.

机构信息

Health Administration Department, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Inquiry. 2020 Jan-Dec;57:46958020954624. doi: 10.1177/0046958020954624.

DOI:10.1177/0046958020954624
PMID:32975465
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7522845/
Abstract

In the insurance industry, the majority of fraud and abuse cases fall into a limited number of patterns, yet false claims normally lead to negative national, local, and organizational effects. Through monitoring the exploitative and abusive behavior commonly found in healthcare services, this paper aims to analyze initiatives implemented by governmental and related healthcare insurance agencies in Saudi Arabia to reduce moral offenses. To accomplish this objective, major governmental health insurance policy documents were analyzed at the macro-level. At the meso-level, semi-structured interviews were conducted with five health insurance professionals on measures undertaken to prevent such incidents. At the micro-level, the critical factors of fraudulent behaviors were analyzed using a retrospective analysis. Data were retrieved from anti-fraud records of ten leading health insurance companies and the focus was mainly on individuals involved in unethical practices between 2014 and 2019. After a full audit was completed, the results concluded that the Saudi healthcare system is composed of twenty-six cooperative health insurance agencies and over 5,202 health services providers. The official documents contain the details of various moral hazard measures. On annual average, more than 196 fraudulent cases were reported with a claim rejection rate of approximately 15%. The majority of fraud cases were reported in dental services with invalid card usage, followed by obstetrics-gynecology services (47 and 113 cases, respectively). Females tended to make up most deceit cases in obstetrics-gynecology with a high level of abuse (95% confidence interval: -83.398 to -24.202;  < .003 and -28 > 638 to -7.362;  < .005, respectively). This study ultimately identifies basic measures employed at the macro-level to reduce moral hazards. However, such measures are not intended to be coherently implemented at the micro-level, especially by health insurance companies and healthcare providers.

摘要

在保险行业,大多数欺诈和滥用案件都属于有限的几种模式,但虚假索赔通常会导致国家、地方和组织的负面后果。本文通过监测医疗服务中常见的剥削和滥用行为,旨在分析沙特阿拉伯政府和相关医疗保险机构为减少道德违规行为而实施的举措。为了实现这一目标,对宏观层面的主要政府医疗保险政策文件进行了分析。在中观层面,对五名医疗保险专业人员进行了半结构化访谈,了解他们为防止此类事件而采取的措施。在微观层面,使用回顾性分析方法分析了欺诈行为的关键因素。数据来自十家领先的医疗保险公司的反欺诈记录,重点是 2014 年至 2019 年期间涉及不道德行为的个人。完成全面审计后,结果表明沙特的医疗保健系统由 26 家合作医疗保险机构和 5202 多家医疗服务提供商组成。官方文件包含各种道德风险措施的详细信息。平均每年报告超过 196 起欺诈案件,拒付率约为 15%。大多数欺诈案件发生在牙科服务中,涉及无效卡使用,其次是妇产科服务(分别为 47 起和 113 起)。在妇产科中,女性往往构成大多数欺骗案例,滥用程度较高(95%置信区间:-83.398 至 -24.202;<0.003 和-28 > 638 至-7.362;<0.005)。本研究最终确定了在宏观层面减少道德风险的基本措施。然而,这些措施并非旨在微观层面上一致实施,尤其是在医疗保险公司和医疗服务提供者方面。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80fe/7522845/49c6b255791d/10.1177_0046958020954624-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80fe/7522845/49c6b255791d/10.1177_0046958020954624-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80fe/7522845/49c6b255791d/10.1177_0046958020954624-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Fraud and Abuse in the Saudi Healthcare System: A Triangulation Analysis.沙特医疗保健系统中的欺诈与滥用:三角分析。
Inquiry. 2020 Jan-Dec;57:46958020954624. doi: 10.1177/0046958020954624.
2
Physicians perception of health insurance in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯医生对医疗保险的看法。
Saudi Med J. 2006 May;27(5):693-9.
3
Multi-stage methodology to detect health insurance claim fraud.用于检测医疗保险索赔欺诈的多阶段方法。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2016 Sep;19(3):249-60. doi: 10.1007/s10729-015-9317-3. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
4
Research on the risk governance of fraudulent reimbursement of patient consultation fees.患者就诊费用欺诈性报销的风险治理研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 12;12:1339177. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1339177. eCollection 2024.
5
Detecting hospital fraud and claim abuse through diabetic outpatient services.通过糖尿病门诊服务检测医院欺诈和索赔滥用行为。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2008 Dec;11(4):353-8. doi: 10.1007/s10729-008-9054-y.
6
A study on the path of governance in health insurance fraud considering moral hazard.考虑道德风险的医疗保险欺诈治理路径研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 14;11:1199912. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1199912. eCollection 2023.
7
Healthcare insurance fraud detection using data mining.利用数据挖掘进行医疗保险欺诈检测。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Apr 26;24(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02512-4.
8
[Fraud in the health-care system from the perspective of the public health insurance companies. Empirical findings on the work of anti-fraud agencies].[从公共医疗保险机构视角看医疗保健系统中的欺诈行为。关于反欺诈机构工作的实证研究结果]
Gesundheitswesen. 2010 Jul;72(7):404-11. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1234097. Epub 2009 Nov 4.
9
The evaluation of trustworthiness to identify health insurance fraud in dentistry.评估可信度以识别牙科医疗保险欺诈行为。
Artif Intell Med. 2017 Jan;75:40-50. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2016.12.002. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
10
What influences the public's willingness to report health insurance fraud in familiar or unfamiliar healthcare settings? a cross-sectional study of the young and middle-aged people in China.什么因素影响公众在熟悉或不熟悉的医疗保健环境中举报医疗保险欺诈的意愿?一项对中国中青年人群的横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 2;24(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17581-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of the Cooperative Health Insurance System in Saudi Arabia on Universal Health Coverage-A Systematic Literature Review.沙特阿拉伯合作健康保险制度对全民健康覆盖的影响——一项系统文献综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jan 1;13(1):60. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13010060.
2
Healthcare Financing in Saudi Arabia: A Comprehensive Review.沙特阿拉伯的医疗保健融资:全面综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Dec 17;12(24):2544. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12242544.
3
Advantages and Challenges of Implementation and Strategies for Health Insurance in Saudi Arabia: A Systemic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
National Health Expenditure Projections, 2019-28: Expected Rebound In Prices Drives Rising Spending Growth.《2019 - 2028年国家卫生支出预测:价格预期反弹推动支出增长上升》
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Apr;39(4):704-714. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00094. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
2
The promise and peril of universal health care.全民医保的承诺与风险。
Science. 2018 Aug 24;361(6404). doi: 10.1126/science.aat9644.
3
Organizational Health Literacy: Review of Theories, Frameworks, Guides, and Implementation Issues.组织健康素养:理论、框架、指南及实施问题综述
沙特阿拉伯实施医疗保险的优势、挑战及策略:系统性综述。
Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241233447. doi: 10.1177/00469580241233447.
4
Incidence of moral hazards among health care providers in the implementation of social health insurance toward universal health coverage: evidence from rural province hospitals in Indonesia.社会医疗保险实施过程中医疗服务提供者道德风险的发生率:来自印度尼西亚农村省级医院的证据。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 17;11:1147709. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1147709. eCollection 2023.
5
How do moral hazard behaviors lead to the waste of medical insurance funds? An empirical study from China.道德风险行为如何导致医疗保险基金浪费?来自中国的实证研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 26;10:988492. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.988492. eCollection 2022.
6
Why Not Blow the Whistle on Health Care Insurance Fraud? Evidence from Jiangsu Province, China.为何不揭发医疗保险欺诈行为?来自中国江苏省的证据。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 Oct 12;15:1897-1915. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S379300. eCollection 2022.
7
The Shared Experience of Insured and Uninsured Patients: A Comparative Study.参保患者与未参保患者的共同体验:一项对比研究。
J Environ Public Health. 2022 May 31;2022:7712938. doi: 10.1155/2022/7712938. eCollection 2022.
8
Building learning organizational culture during COVID-19 outbreak: a national study.在 COVID-19 疫情期间构建学习型组织文化:一项全国性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 4;21(1):422. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06454-9.
9
Identifying Healthcare Professional Roles in Developing Palliative Care: A Mixed Method.确定姑息治疗中医疗保健专业人员的角色:混合方法。
Front Public Health. 2021 Mar 3;9:615111. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.615111. eCollection 2021.
Inquiry. 2018 Jan-Dec;55:46958018757848. doi: 10.1177/0046958018757848.
4
The link between UHC reforms and health system governance: lessons from Asia.全民健康覆盖改革与卫生系统治理之间的联系:亚洲的经验教训。
J Health Organ Manag. 2017 May 15;31(3):270-285. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-11-2016-0220.
5
Exploring shared risks through public-private partnerships in public health programs: a mixed method.通过公私伙伴关系在公共卫生项目中探索共同风险:一种混合方法。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jun 12;17(1):571. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4489-z.
6
Mandated Health Insurance and Provider Reimbursement via Private Insurance: Evidence From the Massachusetts Health Reform.强制医疗保险与通过私人保险进行的医疗服务提供者报销:来自马萨诸塞州医疗改革的证据
Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2017 Jan 13;4:2333392816687206. doi: 10.1177/2333392816687206. eCollection 2017 Jan-Dec.
7
Income-Related Inequalities in Access to Dental Care Services in Japan.日本牙科护理服务可及性方面与收入相关的不平等现象。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 May 12;14(5):524. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14050524.
8
Evidence for overuse of medical services around the world.世界各地医疗服务过度使用的证据。
Lancet. 2017 Jul 8;390(10090):156-168. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32585-5. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
9
Insurance companies' point of view toward moral hazard incentives.保险公司对道德风险激励措施的看法。
J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2016 Nov 5;9:12. eCollection 2016.
10
Which moral hazard? Health care reform under the Affordable Care Act of 2010.哪种道德风险?2010年《平价医疗法案》下的医疗保健改革。
J Health Organ Manag. 2016 Jun 20;30(4):510-29. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-03-2015-0054.