Röhm Alexander, Grengel Michelle, Möhring Michélle, Zensen-Möhring Johannes, Nellen Cosima, Hastall Matthias R
Qualitative Research Methods and Strategic Communication for Health, Inclusion, and Participation, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.
Intellectual Disabilities in Rehabilitation and Education, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 26;13:910702. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.910702. eCollection 2022.
Institutional and individual stigmatization represent major barriers that prevent children with disabilities from accessing education. It can be presumed that children with disabilities are labeled as such even in inclusive educational settings and that teachers' attitudes toward inclusive education and children with disabilities play a crucial role in this context. Against this background, the present study aims to (a) apply and conceptualize the mixed-blessings model in the context of stigma-related reactions to children's disability labels in inclusive education and (b) shed light on the causal attributions of teachers that underlie stigma-related attitudes toward children with various disabilities. A 3 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 online experiment examined the ways in which disability-specific causes and symptoms, the type of disability in question, the children's sex, and efficacy cues regarding educational efforts affect future teachers' attitudes toward and expectations of inclusive education as well as their social distance toward children with disabilities. The participants in this experiment were = 605 German student and trainee teachers representing different types of teaching professions. A multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) revealed that, in particular, the cause attributed to the disability, the depicted type of disability and the probability of learning success led to changes in attitudes. Respondents' teaching self-efficacy and their status as students or trainees emerged as moderators of the effect of pupils' type of disability. As a result, teacher education and training as well as communication regarding pupils with disabilities require a high degree of sensitivity to disability-specific and efficacy-related cues to prevent (accidental) professional or institutional stigmatization.
机构和个人的污名化是阻碍残疾儿童接受教育的主要障碍。可以推测,即使在全纳教育环境中,残疾儿童也会被贴上这样的标签,而且在这种情况下,教师对全纳教育和残疾儿童的态度起着至关重要的作用。在此背景下,本研究旨在:(a)在全纳教育中对与儿童残疾标签相关的污名化反应的背景下应用并概念化利弊共存模型;(b)阐明教师对各种残疾儿童的污名化相关态度背后的因果归因。一项3×2×2×2×2的在线实验研究了特定残疾原因和症状、所讨论的残疾类型、儿童性别以及教育努力的效能线索如何影响未来教师对全纳教育的态度和期望,以及他们与残疾儿童的社会距离。该实验的参与者为605名代表不同教学专业类型的德国学生和实习教师。多变量方差分析(MANOVA)表明,特别是归因于残疾的原因、所描述的残疾类型和学习成功的可能性导致了态度的变化。受访者的教学自我效能以及他们作为学生或实习生的身份成为学生残疾类型影响的调节因素。因此,教师教育和培训以及关于残疾学生的沟通需要对特定残疾和与效能相关的线索高度敏感,以防止(意外的)职业或机构污名化。