Schroeder Arthritis Institute, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023 Nov 2;62(11):3610-3618. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac653.
To phenotype SLE based on symptom burden (disease damage, system involvement and patient reported outcomes), with a specific focus on objective and subjective cognitive function.
SLE patients ages 18-65 years underwent objective cognitive assessment using the ACR Neuropsychological Battery (ACR-NB) and data were collected on demographic and clinical variables, disease burden/activity, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), depression, anxiety, fatigue and perceived cognitive deficits. Similarity network fusion (SNF) was used to identify patient subtypes. Differences between the subtypes were evaluated using Kruskal-Wallis and χ2 tests.
Of the 238 patients, 90% were female, with a mean age of 41 years (s.d. 12) and a disease duration of 14 years (s.d. 10) at the study visit. The SNF analysis defined two subtypes (A and B) with distinct patterns in objective and subjective cognitive function, disease burden/damage, HRQoL, anxiety and depression. Subtype A performed worst on all significantly different tests of objective cognitive function (P < 0.03) compared with subtype B. Subtype A also had greater levels of subjective cognitive function (P < 0.001), disease burden/damage (P < 0.04), HRQoL (P < 0.001) and psychiatric measures (P < 0.001) compared with subtype B.
This study demonstrates the complexity of cognitive impairment (CI) in SLE and that individual, multifactorial phenotypes exist. Those with greater disease burden, from SLE-specific factors or other factors associated with chronic conditions, report poorer cognitive functioning and perform worse on objective cognitive measures. By exploring different ways of phenotyping SLE we may better define CI in SLE. Ultimately this will aid our understanding of personalized CI trajectories and identification of appropriate treatments.
根据症状负担(疾病损伤、系统受累和患者报告的结局)对系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)进行表型分析,特别关注客观和主观认知功能。
年龄在 18-65 岁之间的 SLE 患者接受 ACR 神经心理成套测验(ACR-NB)进行客观认知评估,并收集人口统计学和临床变量、疾病负担/活动、健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)、抑郁、焦虑、疲劳和感知认知缺陷的数据。相似性网络融合(SNF)用于识别患者亚型。使用 Kruskal-Wallis 和 χ2 检验评估亚型之间的差异。
在 238 名患者中,90%为女性,平均年龄为 41 岁(标准差 12 岁),在研究就诊时的疾病病程为 14 年(标准差 10 年)。SNF 分析定义了两个具有不同客观和主观认知功能、疾病负担/损伤、HRQoL、焦虑和抑郁模式的亚型。与亚型 B 相比,亚型 A 在所有客观认知功能差异显著的测试中表现最差(P<0.03)。与亚型 B 相比,亚型 A 的主观认知功能(P<0.001)、疾病负担/损伤(P<0.04)、HRQoL(P<0.001)和精神科指标(P<0.001)更高。
这项研究表明 SLE 认知障碍(CI)的复杂性,并且存在个体、多因素表型。那些具有更大疾病负担的患者,无论是来自 SLE 特异性因素还是与慢性疾病相关的其他因素,都报告认知功能更差,并且在客观认知测量中表现更差。通过探索 SLE 表型的不同方法,我们可以更好地定义 SLE 中的 CI。最终,这将有助于我们了解个性化 CI 轨迹和确定合适的治疗方法。