Suppr超能文献

正视前方或侧视时的恐惧表情:独立于特质焦虑的早期神经元反应。

Fearful faces straight ahead or in the periphery: Early neuronal responses independently of trait anxiety.

机构信息

Institute of Medical Psychology and Systems Neuroscience, University of Muenster.

Otto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Muenster.

出版信息

Emotion. 2023 Sep;23(6):1687-1701. doi: 10.1037/emo0001184. Epub 2022 Nov 17.

Abstract

For humans, it is vitally important to rapidly detect potentially threatening stimuli such as fearful faces in the periphery. Trait anxiety has been related to biased responses to threatening faces, which might be more pronounced for peripheral stimuli. We examined the impact of spatial location and trait anxiety on event-related potentials to fearful faces (ERPs) in a large sample ( = 80). Using a face-unrelated oddball detection task and online eye-tracking, we ensured central fixation but sustained attention to the location of fearful and neutral faces at central or peripheral locations (12° left or right). Manipulation checks showed high task performance and successful shifts of visuospatial attention indexed by prestimulus alpha lateralization of the EEG spectra. Concerning ERPs, we observed increased P1 amplitudes for fearful compared to neutral faces, independent of the spatial location. In contrast, the N170 to fearful faces was only potentiated for centrally presented faces. Finally, fearful and neutral faces did not differ during the EPN window at any spatial location. Trait anxiety was unrelated to fearful-neutral ERP differences for each examined location. Our findings show that differential P1 responses are less constrained by the stimulus location, possibly due to coarse low-level stimulus information processing. However, the relative N170 increase for fearful faces depends on the central stimulus location. Furthermore, findings support the view that differential processing at the stage of the EPN depends on attentional conditions. Finally, our results question the hypothesis that trait anxiety differences correlate with mandatorily altered processing of threatening stimuli. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

对于人类来说,快速检测潜在的威胁性刺激物(如外周的恐惧面孔)至关重要。特质焦虑与对威胁面孔的偏向反应有关,这种偏向反应在外周刺激物中可能更为明显。我们在一个大样本(n=80)中检查了空间位置和特质焦虑对恐惧面孔(ERP)的影响。使用与面孔无关的Oddball 检测任务和在线眼动追踪,我们确保了中央注视,但持续关注中央或外周位置(12°左或右)的恐惧和中性面孔的位置。操纵检查表明,高任务表现和成功转移了视觉空间注意力,表现为 EEG 频谱的预刺激 alpha 侧化。关于 ERP,我们观察到与中性面孔相比,恐惧面孔的 P1 振幅增加,而与空间位置无关。相比之下,只有中央呈现的面孔会增强 N170 对恐惧面孔的反应。最后,在任何空间位置,EPN 窗口中恐惧和中性面孔都没有差异。特质焦虑与每个检查位置的恐惧-中性 ERP 差异无关。我们的发现表明,差异 P1 反应对外周刺激位置的限制较小,这可能是由于粗粒度的低水平刺激信息处理。然而,恐惧面孔的相对 N170 增加取决于中央刺激位置。此外,研究结果支持了这样一种观点,即 EPN 阶段的差异处理取决于注意力条件。最后,我们的结果质疑了特质焦虑差异与威胁刺激强制性改变处理相关的假设。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验