Unit of Infectious Diseases, Microbiology and Preventive Medicine, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Seville, Spain.
Institute of Biomedicine of Seville (IBiS), Virgen del Rocío University Hospital/CSIC/University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
J Med Virol. 2023 Jan;95(1):e28317. doi: 10.1002/jmv.28317. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
The objectives of this work were to assess the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs for viral community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and the performance of pneumonia severity index (PSI) and CURB-65 severity scores in the viral CAP in adults. A prospective observational cohort study of consecutive 341 hospitalized adults with CAP was performed between January 2018 and March 2020. Demographics, comorbidities, symptoms/signs, analytical data, severity scores, antimicrobials, and outcomes were recorded. Blood, NP swabs, sputum, and urine samples were collected at admission and assayed by multiplex real time-PCR, bacterial cultures, and Streptococcus pneumoniae and Legionella pneumophila antigens detection, to determine the etiologies and quantify the viral load. The etiology was identified in 174 (51.0%) patients, and in 85 (24.9%) it was viral, the most frequent rhinovirus and influenza virus. The sensitivity of viral detection in sputum (50.7%) was higher than in NP swabs (20.9%). Compared with sputum, the positive predictive value and specificity of NP swabs for viral diagnosis were 95.8% and 96.9%, respectively. Performance of PSI and CURB-65 scores in all CAP with etiologic diagnosis were as expected, with mortality associated with higher values, but they were not associated with mortality in patients with viral pneumonia. NP swabs have lower sensitivity but high specificity for the diagnosis of viral CAP in adults compared with sputum, reinforcing the use NP swabs for the diagnostic etiology work-up. The PSI and CURB-65 scores did not predict mortality in the viral CAP, suggesting that they need to be updated scores based on the identification of the etiological agent.
本研究旨在评估鼻咽(NP)拭子在社区获得性病毒性肺炎(CAP)诊断中的敏感性和特异性,以及肺炎严重指数(PSI)和 CURB-65 严重程度评分在成人病毒性 CAP 中的表现。2018 年 1 月至 2020 年 3 月,对连续 341 例住院 CAP 成人患者进行了前瞻性观察队列研究。记录了人口统计学、合并症、症状/体征、分析数据、严重程度评分、抗生素和结局。入院时采集血、NP 拭子、痰和尿标本,采用多重实时 PCR、细菌培养和肺炎链球菌和嗜肺军团菌抗原检测进行检测,以确定病因并定量病毒载量。在 174 例(51.0%)患者中确定了病因,其中 85 例(24.9%)为病毒性病因,最常见的病原体为鼻病毒和流感病毒。痰标本中病毒检测的敏感性(50.7%)高于 NP 拭子(20.9%)。与痰相比,NP 拭子对病毒诊断的阳性预测值和特异性分别为 95.8%和 96.9%。在所有有病因诊断的 CAP 中,PSI 和 CURB-65 评分的表现与预期一致,死亡率与分值升高相关,但与病毒性肺炎患者的死亡率无关。NP 拭子在成人病毒性 CAP 的诊断中敏感性较低,但特异性较高,提示与痰相比,NP 拭子更适合用于病因诊断。PSI 和 CURB-65 评分不能预测病毒性 CAP 的死亡率,表明需要根据病因鉴定结果对其进行更新。